To: blam
Sandy spent the last 24 years pissing on the Constitution, negating the power of Congress and the States and now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch?
2 posted on
03/12/2006 6:51:15 PM PST by
msnimje
(SAMMY for SANDY --- THAT IS WHAT I CALL A GOOD TRADE!!!)
To: msnimje
Of course. Don't you know in THEIR warped little world unbridled power should rest solely in the hands of Unelected Judges. HOW dare anyone think to impinge on their unchecked powers!
9 posted on
03/12/2006 6:53:27 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
To: msnimje
Isn't she the lame brained judge that wanted to bring international law into our courts.
18 posted on
03/12/2006 6:56:38 PM PST by
OKIEDOC
(There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
To: msnimje
"Sandy spent the last 24 years pissing on the Constitution, negating the power of Congress and the States and now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch?"
That was so well stated that it needed to be posted yet again ;o)
42 posted on
03/12/2006 7:06:16 PM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: msnimje
now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch?Huh? Try reading the article.
93 posted on
03/12/2006 7:47:59 PM PST by
Sandy
To: msnimje
Her lasting imprint on the court will be her recent opinion where she favored affirmative action. She believed it would be necessary (Constitutional) for another 25 years. How something can stop being Constitutional in 25 years is reasonable only in the minds of those who believe the Consittution has no enduring meaning.
104 posted on
03/12/2006 9:00:00 PM PST by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: msnimje
I know! It had me ROTFLOL!
109 posted on
03/12/2006 9:35:27 PM PST by
CyberAnt
(Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
To: msnimje
Sandy spent the last 24 years pissing on the Constitution, negating the power of Congress and the States and now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch? Yup. 24 years of trying to create a dictatorship of the judiciary down the drain. Her bitter tears over a wasted life are sweet to me.
If you believe a SC Justice should have a consistent judicial philosophy, believe in the Constitution as written, believe that democracy is a good thing (as opposed to Rule By Court) and trust the people to make up their own minds without a political elite telling them what to do, then the only possible opinion of Ms. O'Connor is that she is a drooling idiot.
122 posted on
03/13/2006 12:57:18 PM PST by
Da Bilge Troll
(Defeatism is not a winning strategy!)
To: msnimje
Sandy spent the last 24 years pissing on the Constitution, negating the power of Congress and the States and now she wants to warn us about unbridled power in the Executive Branch? O'Conner's idea of judicial independence is judicial unaccountability...a dictatorship of the judicial. Incredible how warped some of these people are. This old bag should be placed in a corner somewhere muttering to herself and not on a judicial bench.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson