Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gipper08; Seattle Conservative
The President agreed to the review but apparently not the HOLD.

According to whom?  That's totally unsourced information.  Interesting, if true, but if not... 

Exactly who are you getting your information from and why aren't you sourcing it here?  Without sourcing it's kaka.  With sourcing it's valuable to this entire community. And who said the President had to agree to a hold? Where, exactly did that requirement come from? Sounds bogus to me.

Learn from Seattle Conservative.  Posts are valuable in proportion to the links in the posts and the value of the links.

(to Seattle Conservative - my apologies for brining you into something you haven't been involved with, but I can't think of a better example for someone who does this the right way)

1,169 posted on 03/12/2006 5:07:25 PM PST by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 798 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
OH FOR PETE'S SAKE!!!!!

30 US Reps for Bush Impeachment Inquiry

1,170 posted on 03/12/2006 5:12:23 PM PST by eeevil conservative (beware of MR GRIM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson