[demlosers]

The count is about 2 million Saddam documents, and at least 300 hrs of Saddam tapes.

[RAY]

It is simple, the MSM hates President Bush!

[capt. norm]

This really exposes the media as they try to hide information that proves all the "Bush Lied" crap from the left was bogus.

It would pain them to no end to have to admit this.

My guess is that they are trying to figure a way of discrediting the new info or (more likely) coming up with some really creative "spin" to save face.

It will be interesting to see how imaginative they will get with this story.

[seastay]

it doesn't help when the press tries to interpret history:

Saddam feared own army as US invaded:

Mar 11, 2006 — NEW YORK (Reuters) - Citing a classified U.S. military report as well other documents and interviews, the Times also said that top Iraqi commanders were shocked when Saddam told them three months before the war that he had no weapons of mass destruction.

[Cobra64]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1511842/posts

[Tzimisce]

more open mindedness from your friends on the left.

[pawdoggie]

Obviously President Bush and his "handlers" don't care that a large percentage of Americans think that he's a "liar" who "misled" us into an unnecessary war with Iraq. Apparently they have no vested interest in getting the truth out. Why should anyone here worry about it?

[Radix]

Selective coverage by biased media

 

Some other headlines of similar significance below.

 

 

The sun rises in the east.

 

Women think different than men.

 

One plus one equals two.

 

 

Densa Quiz.

[Bullish]

One would think that if Vice President Dick Cheney's hunting accident deserved more than one week of commentary in the media, that these noteworthy news stories would at least be mentioned once on the front page of our media.

If it doesn't fit the template that "Bush lied" then they will not print.

[Richard Axtell]

This "Cobra II" book is CYA for the MSM, revealing nothing we didn't know, and professing that Bush ignored good advice. NOTHING mentioned would have resulted in success. The authors engage in a great deal of assumption-making regarding micromanagement of everything from troop movements to PR, also with the assumption that no serious analysis or criticism of the book will be forth coming.

This is just more "Bush Lied" when all the growing body of evidence says is that "Saddam fooled the left" and continues to. The WMD issue is one that the NYT and its Democrat allies had best leave alone, as they have worn out that avenue of demagoguery,

Not one word on the considerable aid and comfort afforded by the leftist press and the Democrats, like Durbin, Rockefeller, Leahy, Kennedy, Pelosi an Murtha, and how the insurgency has been prolonged by the Cronkite-like effect their duplicity and fraud. I look forward to real analysis of how the Democrats and the left have undermined our national security, and now brazenly try to capitalize on it. That is what we need to know.