Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
Locked on 03/13/2006 10:44:43 PM PST by Jim Robinson, reason:

Enough already!!



Skip to comments.

BDS [Bush Derangement Syndrome] On the Right (Paleocons, and the like)
To The Point ^ | March 9, 2005 | Dr. Jack Wheeler

Posted on 03/11/2006 4:08:48 PM PST by quidnunc

Ever since George W. Bush won the presidency by preventing Al Gore's hanging-chad attempt to steal it, liberal Democrats have become progressively infected with BDS — Bush Derangement Syndrome.

Here's how I think that the contagion of BDS is now infecting a number of conservative Republicans.

If you're a guy, perhaps you have endured this unpleasant and bewildering experience. You're in a relationship and you and the lady have had some disagreements but nothing major. From your perspective things are pretty ok. Then one day you and she disagree on some minor trivial issue — and suddenly, inexplicably, it escalates as she unloads on you.

It seems like the love of your life has had a personality transplant, you're facing a virago disgorging a torrent of anger, and all you can think is, "Where did this come from?"

If you're a guy, you're nodding your head in understanding. If you're a gal, you're muttering, "Men are so clueless. We give them all these hints for so long that things are bugging us, they never get the message, then when we finally can't take it any more and snap, they're mystified."

I think you get the analogy.

A relationship that suffers this trauma can survive only if both parties calm down afterwards, focus on their mutual interests and commitment, and work together to solve their grievances.

-snip-

But it's another thing entirely when Duncan Hunter (R-CA), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, goes around the bend and offers a bill to make all foreign ownership or leasing of any cargo terminal in any US port illegal. Duncan, my buddy whom I've gone quail hunting with, how could he get so nuts?

There are some 3,200 terminals in US ports. 80% of them are foreign owned or leased. Unions and government regulations have made it impossible for US shipping companies to stay in business, making them bit players in the international shipping business. (See this story in the New York Times, US Companies Weighed Anchor on Ports Long Ago.)

Duncan's bill would cause astronomical damage to the US economy, but he doesn't care because he's on a BDS rant.

-snip-


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antiwarright; bds; brownshirt; fortheloveofpete; getoverit; ignorant; metrosexual; nextissue; paleozenophobicons; sexist; soreloserism; toetheline
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-474 next last
To: Gelato

That's so true. He needs some new staff before any more damage is done.

I'll never forget how angry I was when during the last election, he sided with John Kerry over the Swiftboat vets. That was such a stupid thing to do. It now appears that Mehlman was behind that. I cannot believe that men that are supposed to be so intelligent have such little common sense.


261 posted on 03/11/2006 10:37:30 PM PST by Proud Conservative2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Actually, most wanted Janice R. Brown.
Everyone was thinking "female."

I was pleasantly surprised by Alito's selection. I never thought I'd see 5 Roman Catholics sitting on the bench of SCOTUS. (I am RC).


262 posted on 03/11/2006 10:39:03 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I like JRB also for SCOTUS, but happy she stayed on our CA court. We needed her here.


263 posted on 03/11/2006 10:42:08 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: onyx

"I was pleasantly surprised by Alito's selection. I never thought I'd see 5 Roman Catholics sitting on the bench of SCOTUS. (I am RC)."

But we still can't get 5 to overturn Roe V Wade, its a shame.


264 posted on 03/11/2006 10:43:57 PM PST by RHINO369
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Maybe she'll be next, provided we maintain the senate majority and Stevens keeps his word and retires under a GOP president.


265 posted on 03/11/2006 10:44:01 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: RHINO369


Kennedy (Catholic) will have to be persuaded.


266 posted on 03/11/2006 10:45:00 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep
Did you also tell to pick Alito? Get over yourself!

Alito was well known as someone on the conservatives' shortlist. He was a logical choice when the president decided to please his base.

Bush showed leadership by listening to his base and correcting a bad decision before it was too late. He's human, he made a mistake, and then made it right.

That's how true leadership works.

267 posted on 03/11/2006 10:47:14 PM PST by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I would like to see it, knowing that GWB will also choose her replacement. It would be a win win situation.


268 posted on 03/11/2006 10:47:55 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep

Have a good night.


269 posted on 03/11/2006 10:48:55 PM PST by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: 1035rep


Me too. You're right -- a WIN, WIN.


270 posted on 03/11/2006 10:48:57 PM PST by onyx (IF ONLY 10% of Muslims are radical, that's still 120 MILLION who want to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: Gelato

You too!


271 posted on 03/11/2006 10:51:19 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
portgate

brainstemgate

272 posted on 03/11/2006 11:21:32 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Dang! I was just getting ready to blast that troll on post #11, but he's been banned already! LOL

It works if you reply to post 11. It worked for me.

273 posted on 03/11/2006 11:30:19 PM PST by higgmeister (In the Shadow of The Big Chicken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Hill of Tara
I'm just curious, who did all these "Real Conservatives", opposite us fake ones, vote for in the last election if it wasn't Bush? If any of these "Real Conservatives", opposite us fake ones, did vote for Bush why the problem all the sudden after a bit over a year since reelection? If it's immigration, what bill has the President single handily made into law, signed it and then vetoed it? It's fine to criticize an elected official but it's not fair to Bash the person who, in all reality, has only a small part in the overall complaint. As for the Ports Deal, I don't think Congress has gotten their fair share of the beating in relation to what Bush did. Congress created the CIFIUS process and they've had the same criteria on it for at least 12 years. Congress should have been working on it right after 911 but we know they didn't because after all the President has never vetoed a bill. The last time I remember a viable, as in the running, 3rd party option we ended up with 8 years of Clinton and I don't think that's what any Real Conservative or us fake one want.
274 posted on 03/12/2006 12:42:13 AM PST by Wasanother (Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
It's getting pretty bad when our own leadership and the hacks in our own party start sounding like La Raza and Jesse Jackson.

I thought you didn't belong to a party.

275 posted on 03/12/2006 2:49:55 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: brainstem223
Congress responds to the 83%-17% poll where the public gives overwhelming thumbs down to the port deal. They are there to represent the people, this is our country and we get represented there by our Representatives. That is the American way, and you should be proud.

Leaders are supposed to lead, not follow polls.

The poll just demonstrated that 83% of the people in this country don't want to be bothered by the facts, even if none exist.

276 posted on 03/12/2006 2:55:30 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
If you notice, whenever Harry Reid has a presser to discuss anything, he gives the whole litany of what they consider "Bush's sins"...one after another...relevant to the topic of the presser or not.

That's all Dirty Harry does. He offers NO alternatives of his own.

277 posted on 03/12/2006 2:57:57 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
After regurgitating all the paleo-con talking points, he was asked by Rush "So you're saying that no port facilities should be sold to Arabs, but not because they're Arabs, is that it?"

Another caller got the same question from Rush and hung up.

278 posted on 03/12/2006 3:01:57 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
President Bush and the WH staff completely bungled this issue.

Then what pray tell was the 45-day review for? Everyone found common ground over that issue. It wasn't until facts started seeping to the surface, Congress flinched and killed the deal.

If my synopsis is generally accurate, then the WH staff needs to resign now.

By complying with the law?

279 posted on 03/12/2006 3:05:18 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
And posting this opinion piece is further divisive. How far is this going to go before people here just drop it?

If you think Congress is just going to "drop the issue", you're not paying much attention. Congress' actions on Thursday laid out the template for future foreign investments in this country. If they only scrutinize Arab countries, and 83% of the public gets their panties in a twist, it will be seen as being xenophobic. If they allow China or Pakistan or India or Great Britain to do business here without scrutinization or 83% of the public is ok with it, then it will be seen as being racist toward Arabs.

280 posted on 03/12/2006 3:09:24 AM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 461-474 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson