Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rodguy911

Dubai was not exactly on our side earlier, but I think the sheiks probably want to keep the gold bathroom fixtures and "top model" call girls headed their way. They have probably decided this is how they achieve the above, and it would seem to me that it would have been safe enough to deal with them.

However, I don't see why anybody who expresses concern about this - since the UAE is a Muslim country and therefore part of an ideology that hates the West and has often expressed its desire to exterminate us - should be labeled a xenophobe nutcase. There are serious issues here; the unfortunate thing is that the actions of Congress may have prevented a thorough discussion of this.

On the positive side, it may be a message to Islamic countries that they have got to prove their bona fides. Why they should act like the aggrieved parties when they are the ones who have been attacking us, over many years, is a little beyond me. It's fine to let bygones be bygones, but I would like a little more proof.

Also, the fact that they were also making a bid for a US military supply offering did not strike me as random, but more as part of a strategy. I'd be perfectly willing to be convinced that I'm a paranoid nutball, but I'd like to have someone actually come out and give me the facts to convince me of that.


52 posted on 03/10/2006 2:58:54 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: livius
However, I don't see why anybody who expresses concern about this - since the UAE is a Muslim country and therefore part of an ideology that hates the West and has often expressed its desire to exterminate us - should be labeled a xenophobe nutcase.

/BOGGLE

You sound like the guy who called Rush today...

Rush: "I understand, you don't want arabs running the ports, but it doesn't have to do them being arabs"
Caller: "Right"
55 posted on 03/10/2006 3:03:31 PM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: livius

Very well said.


67 posted on 03/10/2006 3:17:12 PM PST by unfortunately a bluestater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: livius
My pint is that it appears, by what little info we have been privy to, that UAE offered up lots of valued intel. To toy with that over some leases of ports that threaten us very little in the scope of things, is ridiculous.
The bottom line is that we will probably lose what intel they were providing and that endangers the troops.
That is my main beef although there are certainly other aspects of the deal that are extremely bizarre..
73 posted on 03/10/2006 3:23:56 PM PST by rodguy911 (Support the New Media and F.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson