Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US House to vote on ports despite company promise
Reuters ^ | Friday 10 March 2006 | Steve Holland and Susan Cornwell

Posted on 03/10/2006 2:21:04 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite

The U.S. House of Representatives will forge ahead with a vote on blocking an Arab-owned company from managing U.S. ports, to ensure the firm sheds its U.S. holdings as promised, a leadership spokesman said on Friday.

The Republican-run House's refusal to back away from the showdown vote was another blow to President George W. Bush, who suffered a stinging defeat on Thursday when Dubai Ports World said it intended to back out of the deal his administration had approved.

Reverberations from the political earthquake continued on Friday. The United Arab Emirates broke off talks on a free trade pact with the United States, although a spokeswoman for the U.S. Trade Representative's office said delays are common.

Bush said he was concerned the opposition sent a worrying message to Middle East allies.

"In order to win the war on terror, we have got to strengthen our relationships and friendships with moderate Arab countries in the Middle East," Bush told newspaper editors.

State-owned Dubai Ports World surrendered to unrelenting criticism from both Republicans and Democrats in giving up the management of some terminals at six major U.S. ports.

The UAE company said it would transfer the ports to a U.S. entity at the behest of Dubai's ruler, to allay concerns the deal posed a threat to American national security. Details of the transfer were not outlined.

The White House had hoped the announcement would resolve the unprecedented crisis between Bush and a Congress run by his own party in open revolt.

But Ron Bonjean, spokesman for House Speaker Dennis Hastert, said the House vote on a provision to bar the deal would go ahead on Wednesday or Thursday anyway.

"It's a smart move to keep it (the legislation) in there, in case the Dubai thing doesn't work out," he told Reuters.

NATIONAL SECURITY

The outlook for a Senate vote was less clear. Senate Republican leaders have been trying to avoid one in the near future. Deal critic Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, wants more information from the White House.

"If things are as they appear, this is a great victory for national security. But make no mistake, we are going to scrutinize this deal with a fine-tooth comb to make sure the separation between American port operators and Dubai Ports World is complete and security is tight as a drum," he said.

Dubai Ports Chairman Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, asked if the firm would sell the U.S. port management rights, told Reuters: "All this is being worked out by our parties in the States."

But David Hamod, president of the National U.S.-Arab Chamber of Commerce, said it would be hard to find a U.S. company to step in.

"The advantage that the overseas company has is economies of scale. They're doing this on a global level and so it will be very difficult to find a U.S. company in this business large enough to take over the operations," Hamod said.

He also said his group was hearing calls for retribution, including keeping Americans out of Arab markets. "But it's a tiny minority of people who are arguing that," he said.

Bush, who had vowed to veto efforts to block the deal, praised the UAE as a committed ally in the war on terrorism.

"I'm concerned about a broader message this issue could send to our friends and allies around the world, particularly in the Middle East," Bush said.

Treasury Secretary John Snow said his department's lawyers were in contact with DP World about its intentions. He also said the political furor was an isolated case, as he tried to limit damage to the U.S. free-trade image.

Larry Sabato, a political science professor at the University of Virginia, said congressional Republicans are running away from Bush this election year.

"In a way, the port deal was a godsend to them," Sabato said. "It allowed them to put a lot of daylight between themselves and a very unpopular president."

A new poll Friday registered another low of 37 percent in Bush's approval rating.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro, Doug Palmer and Tim Ahmann)


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alwaysrighteverytime; cantstopwhining; elitism; everyonemustlisten; minorityopinionrant; nutheads; port; ports; uae; uaezot; wearealwaysright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-286 next last
To: Stellar Dendrite; Willie Green

"The United Arab Emirates broke off talks on a free trade pact with the United States"

Good news in my opinion.


141 posted on 03/10/2006 5:45:30 PM PST by NapkinUser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

LOL, the simple scumbags spent so much capital blustering about this fabricated "issue" that they're now going to cast meaningless votes about it, dammit, just to make sure that everybody understands that.... they....
whatever.


142 posted on 03/10/2006 5:46:30 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

LOL! I so disagree with you on this issue.. but you do make me laugh... a LOT!


143 posted on 03/10/2006 5:47:50 PM PST by eeevil conservative (I am not flirting......I am not flirting.......honest, I am not flirting......ok..I AM flirting.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

It's sure help us take names, though, won't it?


144 posted on 03/10/2006 5:48:01 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Yep, that it will.
All the cowards can stand up and proudly be counted as successfully wetting their fingers and holding them skyward....


145 posted on 03/10/2006 5:50:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
And just exactly what ports and airbases do you suggest our troops should use once the UAE stops us from using theirs?
146 posted on 03/10/2006 5:51:20 PM PST by AmeriBrit (AMERICA's WORST ENEMIES! http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/0519RNCNo-1.wmv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Fools, the lot of them.


147 posted on 03/10/2006 5:54:42 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

If you listened to Lou Dobbs and his panel this evening, it's already out of control. I couldn't believe the comments. Look for a transcript if you need to know.


148 posted on 03/10/2006 6:00:01 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Don't forget their enablers!"




If my SIL gets one little scratch on him, I will personally hold everyone of these bleeping traitors accountable.
149 posted on 03/10/2006 6:01:15 PM PST by AmeriBrit (AMERICA's WORST ENEMIES! http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/0519RNCNo-1.wmv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: mortal19440

The media and Dems think these clows are heroes.


150 posted on 03/10/2006 6:02:59 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Luke21
Most of these same folks wanted Miers on the Supreme Court.

To be fair, fewer supported Miers than have this DPW deal. Or at least that's my recollection.

151 posted on 03/10/2006 6:03:18 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

Your hysteria is amusing.


152 posted on 03/10/2006 6:04:07 PM PST by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

CNN/Lou Dobbs actually has a poll asking if it's finally time to call W a "lame Duck".


153 posted on 03/10/2006 6:14:37 PM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Post #131......Powerful and right on.


154 posted on 03/10/2006 6:16:15 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa

"Your hysteria is amusing."




Get lost!


155 posted on 03/10/2006 6:17:37 PM PST by AmeriBrit (AMERICA's WORST ENEMIES! http://media1.streamtoyou.com/rnc/0519RNCNo-1.wmv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

"I guess it's just a big joke for little kids to play around with Huh?"

So you're calling the American people "little kids" those people you so denigrate happen to belong to a REPUBLIC.

And you sir.....are no Conservative in any sense of the word.


156 posted on 03/10/2006 6:20:48 PM PST by Sweetjustusnow ("You're either with us or with the terrorists." Time to live up to that statement Mr. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNeocon

"In those cases, you are certainly making a 'race' judgment, but the downside is small, understandable, and so negligible."

Dinesh D'Sousa used the term "rational discrimination."

That is if you see a couple angry gangbangers walking down the same side of the sidewalk as you, a rational choice is to cross to the other side. You simply have no opportunity in a split-second to gather facts - just time to be self-protective.

It's the same with avoiding what looks like a seedy bar when the truth could be that it is seedy looking but the patrons inside are actully pretty "cool".


157 posted on 03/10/2006 6:23:21 PM PST by torchthemummy ("Reid...Kerry...Rockefeller. They were unable to attend due to a prior lack of commitment." - Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Did you see James Carafano on Fox News just now? He is virutally SNEERING at the stupidity of the people who are against this deal. He actually said that we are LESS SAFE now that the UAE has pulled out because the UAE had agreed to make changes and security implementations (at their OWN expense) that the U.S. companies will refuse to make! He also said that the "they'll have access to our security plans" was the dumbest argument of all because the ONLY thing that the company secures is it's OWN CRANES AND BUILDINGS.

Sounds like Carafano just called Frank Gaffney, dumb.

Carafano is right.

158 posted on 03/10/2006 6:24:14 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
I couldn't help to notice that the MSM is now showing the true facts behind the ports deal so that means their only agenda was to kill the deal regardless of surrounding facts. The RINO's once again falls hook, line and sinker.

Lucy pulled the football again.

There goes Peter King and Duncan Hunter flat on their *ss.

159 posted on 03/10/2006 6:25:39 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

Watch the rerun; I left out a LOT of what he said.


160 posted on 03/10/2006 6:26:19 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson