Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: TexasAg1996
Sure the SC can be criticized. We do it on FR all the time!
2 posted on
03/10/2006 9:44:49 AM PST by
mlc9852
To: TexasAg1996
O'Connor Decries Republican Attacks on Courts I herewith decry O'Conner, I've always wanted to decry something or someone.
3 posted on
03/10/2006 9:45:34 AM PST by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: TexasAg1996
"She was a moderate." Yeah; right.
4 posted on
03/10/2006 9:45:37 AM PST by
pabianice
(contact ebay??)
To: TexasAg1996
Now she can let her liberal colors show.
5 posted on
03/10/2006 9:46:05 AM PST by
RetiredArmy
(America is doomed to be socialist. Way too many people with palms pointed up!)
To: TexasAg1996
I am sure glad that old bitch is off the Court now!
6 posted on
03/10/2006 9:46:06 AM PST by
xrp
(Fox News Channel: MISSING WHITE GIRL NETWORK)
To: TexasAg1996
If the justices did what they were supposed to do instead of making up law out of thin air, there would be no criticism.
Go away, Sandra. You were a big disappointment.
7 posted on
03/10/2006 9:46:43 AM PST by
Semi Civil Servant
(The Main Stream Media: Al-Qaeda's most effective spy network.)
To: TexasAg1996
I think what dear Sandra meant to say is that republican attacks on the Court make it much less likely that liberals will be able to make it up as they go along.
8 posted on
03/10/2006 9:47:16 AM PST by
Reactionary
(The Moonbats Need an Enema)
To: TexasAg1996
Hey Sandy! You're useless and forgotten. Go fade away now.
11 posted on
03/10/2006 9:51:40 AM PST by
mikeus_maximus
(Islam is as Islam does.)
To: TexasAg1996
During a speech in Washington, she said Republican leaders' attacks on the courts threaten the constitutional freedoms of Americans.Before dismissing her opinion altogether, does this mean that she endorses the pracice of "penumbras" and other forms of legislation from the bench?
How is this reconciled with the concept of "Constitution Freedoms"?
12 posted on
03/10/2006 9:52:11 AM PST by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: TexasAg1996
Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor showed Thursday that she's not absent from judicial issues.Only absent her mind.
13 posted on
03/10/2006 9:52:47 AM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: TexasAg1996
Great, now we're going to have to listen to President Reagan's biggest mistake go around flapping her gums for media attention every other week.
Where's John Riggins when you really need him.
14 posted on
03/10/2006 9:53:09 AM PST by
jpl
("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
To: TexasAg1996
Dear Sandra,
You retired. Your opinion no longer matters.
16 posted on
03/10/2006 9:54:35 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: TexasAg1996
Oh God.. another Jimmy Carter. It would be nice if people understood when to disappear gracefully into the sunset. She had her chance, now let go please :)
19 posted on
03/10/2006 9:55:22 AM PST by
ElPatriota
(Let's not forget, we are all still friends despite our differences)
To: TexasAg1996
Daily Kos going (more) insane:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2006/3/10/82512/7603
20 posted on
03/10/2006 9:55:53 AM PST by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: TexasAg1996
Stop Whining!!!!!!!!!! Stupid liberal b*tch........
21 posted on
03/10/2006 9:56:25 AM PST by
joe fonebone
(Woodstock defined the current crop of libs, but who cleaned up the mess they left?)
To: TexasAg1996
During a speech in Washington, she said Republican leaders' attacks on the courts threaten the constitutional freedoms of Americans.Constitutional freedoms such as those threatened by Kelo? Loved your dissent in that, O'Connor, but it was the liberal block that sandbagged the Fifth on that one - so I'm not sure how Republican attacks factored into that one.
First Amendment? Weren't you one of the ones who voted to uphold McCain-Feingold, O'Connor?
Tenth Amendment - didn't you sandbag Texas on that one, Sandy baby, by voting down their power to regulate sodomy?
Sorry, but your lectures on the Constitution ring hollow - undermined by your very own voting record.
22 posted on
03/10/2006 9:56:37 AM PST by
dirtboy
(I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
To: TexasAg1996
She's 100% right. A lot of the accusations, rhetoric, and proposals directed against judges have been over-the-top.
23 posted on
03/10/2006 9:57:09 AM PST by
jude24
("Thy law is written on the hearts of men, which iniquity itself effaces not." - St. Augustine)
To: TexasAg1996
Republican leaders' attacks on the courts threaten the constitutional freedoms of Americans
Yes. How dare the people (directly or through their elected representatives) criticize the courts. Freedom can only be preserved through unquestioning deference and obedience to nine ex-lawyers.
I hope I don't need to mention the above is sarcasm
To: TexasAg1996
Stick with the United States Constitution and you won't have anything to worry about Sandra. Dig up some reference to European law and expect to be criticized.
To: TexasAg1996
We can criticize Congress, the IRS, the White House, the bureaucracy... but not the Supreme Court?
Does she think she is a god or what?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson