Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Connor Decries Republican Attacks on Courts
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5255712 ^

Posted on 03/10/2006 9:43:20 AM PST by TexasAg1996

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor showed Thursday that she's not absent from judicial issues. During a speech in Washington, she said Republican leaders' attacks on the courts threaten the constitutional freedoms of Americans.

So now the Supreme Court can't be criticized. I hate judges...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hypocrite; idiot; oconnor; rino; sandradayoconnor; scotus; whinerbaby
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Vaquero

This stream could do without any more references to her as a b*tch please.

That is over the top and disrespectful!


81 posted on 03/10/2006 12:04:09 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jude24
She's 100% right. A lot of the accusations, rhetoric, and proposals directed against judges have been over-the-top.

What foreign court told you that?

82 posted on 03/10/2006 12:04:40 PM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Wrongo keebler!

The politically powerful have to change things...and developers have lots of money for both Dems and Repubs.

In Colorado, a 3rd generation landowner of 841 acres is preparing to fight off and ED attempt at grabbing 60 of her acres for a high school.

Right next door is King's Deer. I am unsure how many acres of 2.5 acre lots they have, but they are responsible for the need of a school...so why shouldn't the developer that built the homes SACRIFICE the land!!!


83 posted on 03/10/2006 12:08:32 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: jude24
You obviously haven't been following the courts very closely, if at all.

The courts ARE largely a pack of jack-in-the-box liberal activist clowns. (See: Kelo for a recent example.) And as they grab more and more power away from the other alleged "co-equal" branches of government, they may indeed be flirting with the risk of violent rebellion.

Wake up, dude.

84 posted on 03/10/2006 12:09:16 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Dear Jude24:

I disagree completely with your assertions as being good and proper activity for the public sector.

I don't give a rip if the Gov grabbed acreage back in 1777, I believe it is wrong...and means there is no true private property!


85 posted on 03/10/2006 12:10:03 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777
This stream could do without any more references to her as a b*tch please.

That is over the top and disrespectful!

You are right, no need to insult any dogs.

86 posted on 03/10/2006 12:10:27 PM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: TexasAg1996
What nonsense O'Connor is sprouting. It is the courts that are threatening our constitutional freedoms. Even two-bit judges are already making the most absurd rulings based on their own whims.

O'Connor herself slammed the Constitution in favor of "world opinion" as guiding her, thus violating her oath of office.

87 posted on 03/10/2006 12:12:16 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

Local and state governments have to invent ways of getting MORE TAX REVENUE...that is what drives Kelo!!

We need to drain the swamp and kill the government-growing, money-devouring alligators!!

Then Kelos won't happen.


88 posted on 03/10/2006 12:14:33 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: joyspring777

its not just tax revnues - the politicos personally profit from this. in long branch NJ, the politicos are sitting on the operating boards of the condo development companies, while at the same time using the government's apparatus to seize homes near the ocean.


89 posted on 03/10/2006 12:16:15 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

That is what it is...outright theft.

If you had not sold it, your son could sell it 20 years or so later for 100x as much. They are stealing your future value from you.


90 posted on 03/10/2006 12:16:35 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: jude24

When there are judges that give children rapists weeks in jail or when they use international law to decide American case laws, they are over the top and deserve criticism.


91 posted on 03/10/2006 12:17:15 PM PST by rep-always
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

O'Connor apparently said, "A dictatorship is better stopped at its beginning than at its end."
What a scumbag.


92 posted on 03/10/2006 12:17:18 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #93 Removed by Moderator

To: lugsoul

Perhaps you would have been better off to indicate you were being sarcastic.

There have been classless things said about OConnor on this thread today.

Criticize her actions and ideas, but not need for some to being using personal characterizations like b*tch with their added adjectives.

Were you sarcastic?


94 posted on 03/10/2006 12:34:35 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TexasAg1996

"she's not absent from judicial issues"

--just out of touch with common sense.


95 posted on 03/10/2006 12:37:46 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

I have total confidence that Nina Totenberg has distorted what Justice O'Connor said.

People on this thread can also be reminded that Justice O'Connor played a lead role in smacking down the Florida Supreme Court, thus making GWB president of the United States.


96 posted on 03/10/2006 12:41:40 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

As I recall, it was Justice O'Connor that wrote the scathing dissent in the property rights/eminent domain decision.

My point is, she wasn't all that bad as a justice and she was a lot more good than bad on most issues.


97 posted on 03/10/2006 12:44:17 PM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

See post #87 and try again.


98 posted on 03/10/2006 12:44:45 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

I don't think so....there would have been so much upheaval if they gave it away.

SCOTUS had no choice but to let the existing law of the time stand.

That is like folks saying certain Congressmen or women are instrumental in keeping bases in certain states. For the most part, anyone can fight those battles. It is certainly no reason to keep certain people around for 40 years or so.


99 posted on 03/10/2006 12:45:59 PM PST by joyspring777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: jude24

Notice I said one of the worst, not the worst.


100 posted on 03/10/2006 12:49:55 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson