Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Catholic bishops launch website against 'Da Vinci Code' movie
AFP ^ | Fri Mar 10, 2006

Posted on 03/10/2006 8:55:37 AM PST by presidio9

US Catholic bishops launched a stinging Internet counter-attack on the best-selling novel "The Da Vinci Code," ahead of the release of Ron Howard's film version in May.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops launched a new website refuting key claims made in Dan Brown's novel that are likely to be brought to the big screen in Howard's movie, starring Tom Hanks.

"'The Da Vinci Code' is a mess, a riot of laughable errors and serious misstatements. Almost every page has at least one of each," the bishops wrote on the website Jesusdecoded.com.

"What this novel does (is) ... asks people to consider equivalent to the mainstream Christian tradition quite a few odd claims. Some are merely distortions of hypotheses advanced by serious scholars who do serious research. Others, however, are inaccurate or false," the site claims.

The bishops said the site was aimed at providing "accurate information on the life of Jesus and the origins of Christianity" prior to the release of the movie.

It offers articles written by theologians, media commentators, art experts and others that "provide background and also rebut speculation and inaccuracies about Christ and the origins of Christianity," the bishops said.

But Monsignor Francis Maniscalco of the Diocese of Rockville Centre in New York denied that the website was a knee-jerk defensive reaction.

"Reporters have asked whether even a bestselling novel can seriously damage a Church of one billion believers. No, in the long run, it cannot. But that is not the point. The pastoral concern of the Church is for each and every person.

"If only one person were to come away with a distorted impression of Jesus Christ or his Church, our concern is for that person as if he or she were the whole world," he wrote.

Brown's novel, which has sold nearly 40 million copies worldwide, hinges on the theory that Christ married Mary Magdalene and that they had children, a fact that the church allegedly hid for more than 2000 years.

The movie version of the film, heralded as one of the major cinematic events of 2006, will star Hanks, French actress Audrey Tautou, and British actors Sir Ian McKellen and Paul Bettany.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 40millionsuckers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 03/10/2006 8:55:40 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I hope this movie implodes...........


2 posted on 03/10/2006 8:58:43 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Doubtful, unless it makes a total mess of the plot, convoluted as it is already. Adapting intricate novels to the big screen is never easy, so it could be a disappointing mess that's hard to follow.

From what I understand, if you want to take the book out of the library in either Brooklyn or NYC, you'll have to put it on reserve and wait quite a while. before you get it.

3 posted on 03/10/2006 9:04:20 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
as long as the bishops use the written word of God to fight this movie, it will be shaper than any two edged sword...

I pray with them.

4 posted on 03/10/2006 9:07:24 AM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

"Reporters have asked whether even a bestselling novel can seriously damage a Church of one billion believers."

Its one and a half billion.


5 posted on 03/10/2006 9:09:12 AM PST by Integrityrocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Hymn of the Republic

sharper, not shaper... typing with my fist this morning.


6 posted on 03/10/2006 9:09:23 AM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I haven't read the book, but does the author of this book try to say that this is fact?

Isn't this book just a work of fiction?



7 posted on 03/10/2006 9:10:15 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Battle Hymn of the Republic

Jeesh....It's a novel for Christ sake.


8 posted on 03/10/2006 9:10:39 AM PST by Mr_Peter (Don't let the door hit ya in the a$$ on the way out Bushy...but don't let a Democrat in!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Everything that's in The Code was in Holy Blood, Holy Grail in the 80's. It was claptrap then, it's claptrap now..........


9 posted on 03/10/2006 9:11:05 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

Half a billion are Holiday Catholics.........


10 posted on 03/10/2006 9:12:10 AM PST by Red Badger (And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I understand one of their biggest complaints about the book is that the author asserts certainly things about the Roman Catholic Church and claims they are true while the Church says they are not.

They should document every item and use them as their talking points to show how the author committed slander.


11 posted on 03/10/2006 9:13:28 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican; Mr_Peter
Isn't this book just a work of fiction?

The author asserts in the preface that all the evidence used in the book is factual. This is unusual, and it is a lie. If it were "just a novel" why would he go out of his way to do this.

12 posted on 03/10/2006 9:16:55 AM PST by presidio9 ("Bird Flu" is the new Y2K Virus -Only without the inconvenient deadline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Integrityrocks

And yet reporters don't seem to ask whether a bunch of cartoons can seriously damage a faith of one billion believers.


13 posted on 03/10/2006 9:17:30 AM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mr_Peter
no, it's not a novel for the sake of Christ...

sake means purpose; motive; interest... :-)

14 posted on 03/10/2006 9:17:35 AM PST by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
They should document every item and use them as their talking points to show how the author committed slander.

You know, that brings up an interesting point.
You can't "slander" a dead person.
There isn't a legal precedent for "slander" against someone who rose from the dead. Then again, he did ascend afterward, so I guess that would technically make him dead again in Earthly terms. So "slander" wouldn't apply.

TS
It's Friday, it's lunch time. I'm blowing off steam.

15 posted on 03/10/2006 9:22:57 AM PST by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I have read the book. It is fiction but a good read. I sure wish the bishops would have had the moxie to start a website protesting the pedophiac priests...that was NOT fiction. Where are their priorities? They need to look within not without.


16 posted on 03/10/2006 9:27:47 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
You can't "slander" a dead person.

I don't believe the Roman Catholic Church qualifies as a "dead person."

Whatever you call it, if he misrepresented something and claims it to be true, they should be able to prove him a liar.

17 posted on 03/10/2006 9:28:53 AM PST by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It's a movie - fiction - entertainment.

This is silliness in it's grandest form. I would think that given the news of the last few years that Catholic Bishops would have more important matters to deal with ... I would think.


18 posted on 03/10/2006 9:30:28 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"If only one person were to come away with a distorted impression of Jesus Christ or his Church, our concern is for that person as if he or she were the whole world," he wrote.

Probably the best thing that anyone could have said in the circumstances.

19 posted on 03/10/2006 9:31:57 AM PST by HolgerDansk ("Oh Bother", said Pooh, as he worked the bolt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold

Hey...you and I think alike. Where were theses outraged bishops when the catholic hierarchy was shuffling child molesters from one parrish full of kids to another?

Get real...the book was fiction, the characters were fiction...the pedophiliacs were REAL.


20 posted on 03/10/2006 9:32:59 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson