I wonder why they first said there was a device, and now it's a gas can. No one would ever call a gas can a "device". Were they lying when they first said device, or just changing the story? Do they want the possible other cell bombers to think they aren't discovered?
Just wondering.
bookmark
OPINION: A gas can is not a device, in my opinion.
A gas can connected to something or when lit with
a lighter and a reaction occurs; maybe in the broad
sense that total package might be considered a device.
Anyway, I hate to speculate out loud why the articles
vary to such a degree. I'm not an expert.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=device