Interesting
To: strategofr; neverdem; Army Air Corps
2 posted on
03/09/2006 7:28:19 PM PST by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: strategofr
Believe it when I see it.
3 posted on
03/09/2006 7:28:23 PM PST by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: strategofr
". An aircraft carrier must fight, and find the enemy, and do a lot of other stuff...."
Automation will be fine until something goes really wrong, like a big fire or bomb or missle hit.
To: strategofr
All three carriers are expected to be in service by the middle of the next decade.
Interesting article.
5 posted on
03/09/2006 7:32:26 PM PST by
andyk
(Go Matt Kenseth!)
To: strategofr
The thing about war is that you never can plan for all the contingencies. You need people who have the training and intelligence to respond to whatever happens, often something unexpected.
I'd be a bit worried about a carrier where the nearest person might be a couple of decks and a couple of hundred yards away from a sudden emergency. Maybe it could still be handled, but it's a concern.
Also, a certain amount of redundancy is important. What happens if all your key personnel in some area of expertise get killed? Fewer personnel, less redundancy, fewer backups to take the place of the killed and wounded.
8 posted on
03/09/2006 7:34:46 PM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: stevie_d_64
13 posted on
03/09/2006 7:42:06 PM PST by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer)
To: strategofr
Sounds like an excellent idea in peace time, (and we all know the French boat will never see action) but the Brits should know that you can't fight a damaged ship and save it at the same time. You can maybe do one or the other with a crew that small, but not both.
17 posted on
03/09/2006 7:54:00 PM PST by
adamsjas
To: strategofr
It's taking us years and hundreds of millions just to get robot pickers installed in our grocery warehouse. Good luck with the carriers...
To: strategofr
I thought a good part of the crew requirement was determined by damage control teams. A crew of 40 for a supertanker sized vessel (even armed, fully automate the weapons mounts and round handling) may be ok if it does not expect to see any ordnance heading its way - eventually something's gonna hit!
24 posted on
03/09/2006 8:14:21 PM PST by
Fred Hayek
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
To: xp38
Hey xp... I'll believe it when the Brits...
![](http://users3.ev1.net/~d_c_lee/sonofatpatcher2/fry6.jpg)
And the Frenchies (Gad! Am I reallly thinking this?) built these suckers, man them and make it through a few hundred or so combat sorties and then solve some combat damamge while surviving to fly more sorties!
And I'll believe it when Canada buys one and does the same...
25 posted on
03/09/2006 8:34:13 PM PST by
Bender2
(Redid my FR Homepage just for ya'll... Now, Vote Republican and vote often)
To: strategofr
> aggressive plans for automationBoy, those French will do anything to get out of an honest day's work.
27 posted on
03/09/2006 8:57:59 PM PST by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: strategofr
I wonder how well the robotic carrier will work after the first missile hits it.
Will there be robo-repairmen, too? Heaven forbid the power goes out...
29 posted on
03/09/2006 9:29:20 PM PST by
gogogodzilla
(Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
To: Jeff Head
30 posted on
03/09/2006 9:37:12 PM PST by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: strategofr; fallujah-nuker
Latest artist conception:
![](http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/images/SHIP_CVF_2005_Delta_Design_lg.jpg)
32 posted on
03/09/2006 10:00:50 PM PST by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: strategofr
Kind of reminds me of a line from Star Trek II, when Scotty remarks after his automated piloting system breaks down, "But Captain, it was never designed to go into combat."
To: strategofr
[ Britain and France Build Robocarrier ]
Hmmm a Frogohauler.. sounds like a Rube Goldberg Surrender device to me..
42 posted on
03/10/2006 11:31:52 AM PST by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson