Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China hits back at US criticism [Barf Alert]
BBC ^ | Thursday, 9 March 2006 | BBC

Posted on 03/09/2006 12:06:08 AM PST by indcons

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
From the article: "American 'democracy' is always one for the wealthy and a 'game for the rich'" (Chinese report)

Funny to see this criticism coming from a country that has NO democracy, conducts forced abortions, kills its own citizens, occupies Tibet and Inner Mongolia, and....(think I'll stop here).

1 posted on 03/09/2006 12:06:11 AM PST by indcons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: indcons

Crime is a product of human nature and in a free country there are more opportunites to practice those lower values. Our rates are higher than they should be because the Communist, like the people who run China, are working hard to lower our moral standards and interfer in our ability to fight crime.


2 posted on 03/09/2006 12:23:39 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

These statistic games are meaningless. Who is to say that everyone involved here is going to honestly report their crime statistics in the first place?


3 posted on 03/09/2006 12:28:31 AM PST by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: indcons
occupies Tibet and Inner Mongolia

Oh come on... There is NO controversy over whether Inner Mongolia is Chinese or not. The creation of Inner and Outer Mongolia administrations was made under the Qing dynasty by Manchurian officials. China's capital Beijing (founded by Mongolians and proto-Manchurians) is 50 miles away from Inner Mongolia. During WWII, Inner Mongolia was briefly occupied by the Japanese, but so was Beijing and 1/3 of China. If Inner Mongolia is not Chinese, then Beijing is not Chinese. And that's ridiculous.

Chinese history is very complex, a superficial understanding like yours can be very misleading.
4 posted on 03/09/2006 12:30:49 AM PST by gogoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
The China Daily version is up and on FR too, for those wanting a further chuckle.

Report exposes human rights abuses in US

5 posted on 03/09/2006 12:34:02 AM PST by Lonely Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogoman; monkeywrench; Paul_Denton; Gengis Khan

I was just waiting for the ChiComs on FR to show up...looks lke it didn't take you too long to get here.

Stop discussing my superficial understanding, n00b. You have been here for less than a week (on your second avatar after the first one was banned).


6 posted on 03/09/2006 12:34:05 AM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: old republic
Who is to say that everyone involved here is going to honestly report their crime statistics in the first place?

Very good observation, especially when the reporting government is committing most of the crime. :-)

7 posted on 03/09/2006 12:34:39 AM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MARKUSPRIME

Look who's here :)


8 posted on 03/09/2006 12:36:04 AM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: indcons

There is no "Inner Mongolian" nation as you think, nor was it linked to Outer Mongolia, it's merely an administration division of the old Qing Empire and had some Mongols in it, which lasted 300 years, with most of the conquering done by Manchurians.

During the 1920s, China had an opportunity to become a federation of independent states, not unlike today's EU. It would have divided China into 15-16 states, each with an average population of nearly 40 million, similar to modern Europe then. Tibet would be split in two: Tibet and Chamdo, "China Proper" (this is a modern concept, didn't exist then) would be split around 8 states, Manchuria split into 3 states, Mongolia into 2 (Inner and Outer). This idea was later scrapped and the Republic of China ended up inheriting the entire Qing Empire by 1928. Outer Mongolia declared independence with Soviet help in the 1930s to serve as a buffer state. And here we are. Modern China's territory was INHERITED, not conquered.

The English term "Chinese" is not limited to "China proper" (the concept of which again did not even exist until recently) but encompasses the population of the entire Qing Empire.


9 posted on 03/09/2006 12:51:47 AM PST by gogoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
Stop discussing my superficial understanding, n00b. You have been here for less than a week

What does my being here for just a week have to do with your superficial (rather, lack of) understanding of Chinese history? You made an erroneous claim that the Chinese are "occupying" Inner Mongolia, and I challenged it. There is no need to ping a dozen other people.
10 posted on 03/09/2006 12:54:43 AM PST by gogoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Chi-com trolls like pganini? I am surprised they have not shown up yet.


11 posted on 03/09/2006 1:04:11 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gogoman

Mongolia is a soveriegn nation and China has no business in it, or Taiwan, or Tibet.


12 posted on 03/09/2006 1:06:25 AM PST by Paul_Denton (The U.N. Building. What a joke! They turned it into low rent housing. It's a dump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

Not Inner Mongolia. Inner Mongolia is not Mongolia, never was the same thing.


13 posted on 03/09/2006 1:10:05 AM PST by gogoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gogoman

"Modern China's territory was INHERITED, not conquered.
"

Tibet was inherited? HUH say what?? You are implying that Chinese history is full of peace and love for their neighbors. Is that the party line in China these days?


14 posted on 03/09/2006 3:09:54 AM PST by driftdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gogoman; indcons

And what about the occupation of Tibet, Askai Chin and Uighuristan?


15 posted on 03/09/2006 3:20:24 AM PST by Gengis Khan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: indcons
China is right of course, there are human rights abuses in the U.S.

For example, workers are forced to pay up to 42 percent of their earnings to government.

Affirmative Action forces some people to be denied their rights over others.

American citizens are forced to feed, clothes and shelter citizens of other countries who come to the U.S. illegally.

American citizens are stopped and strip-searched at airports without probabal cause.

Property is seized from private owners to be given to other private individuals under cover of "emanate domain."

American citizens are forced to pay for the abortion of people they don't even know.

Wealthy people are not always treated the same under the laws that poor people receive.
17 posted on 03/09/2006 5:23:07 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons
China is right of course, there are human rights abuses in the U.S.

For example, workers are forced to pay up to 42 percent of their earnings to government.

Affirmative Action forces some people to be denied their rights over others.

American citizens are forced to feed, clothes and shelter citizens of other countries who come to the U.S. illegally.

American citizens are stopped and strip-searched at airports without probabal cause.

Property is seized from private owners to be given to other private individuals under cover of "emanate domain."

American citizens are forced to pay for the abortion of people they don't even know.

Wealthy people are not always treated the same under the laws that poor people receive.
18 posted on 03/09/2006 5:23:30 AM PST by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Sounds like a list of Democrat talking points. Nice that our domestic politicians can give such aid and comfort to foreign competitors.


19 posted on 03/09/2006 7:04:05 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton; gogoman; Gengis Khan; monkeywrench

Gogoman (AKA ckwilliams) is here though :)

The thread diversionary tactics and the attacks by the week-old sign-up are "interesting."


20 posted on 03/09/2006 8:08:24 AM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson