Posted on 03/08/2006 8:00:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge
The American Civil Liberties Union claimed in a federal lawsuit Wednesday that California's lethal injection protocol violates the First Amendment rights of execution witnesses by not allowing them to see if the inmate is experiencing pain before death.
The suit, filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco, says the only reason San Quentin State Prison officials inject a paralyzing agent is to sanitize the execution and prevent witnesses from perhaps seeing convulsions.
The paralyzing drug, according to the lawsuit, "makes it impossible for witnesses to determine whether death row inmates in California are being subjected to substantial and unnecessary pain before dying."
The induced paralysis, the group argued, conceals significant information to which the public is entitled.
The ACLU, which filed the suit on behalf of San Francisco-based Pacific News Service, made a similar argument a year ago before the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on behalf of a condemned inmate. The court rejected it on procedural grounds, and did not reach the merits of the challenge.
In response to Wednesday's filing, Nathan Barankin, spokesman for Attorney General Bill Lockyer, said "The ACLU does not have a right to determine what method the state of California should use in carrying out the death penalty." He said the "paralyzing agent effectively stops inmate breathing."
Under California's injection protocol, a sedative, then a paralyzing agent and finally heart-stopping drugs are injected. The state is seeking court permission to drip a sedative continually to ensure unconsciousness.
At California executions, about two dozen members of the media, in addition to public officials and relatives of the slain are present. They are able to see prison officials strap the condemned man onto a gurney, see them wrap the inmate's fists into a ball of tape and watch as they poke him with needles.
Prison officials then move out of public site and the drugs begin pouring.
Wednesday's lawsuit comes two weeks after the execution of California prisoner Michael Morales was called off amid questions of whether inmates suffer too much pain during the execution in violation of the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Litigation is ongoing in the Morales case, with hearings on California's injection protocol set to begin May 2 in San Jose federal court. The Supreme Court has never addressed whether lethal injection amounts to cruel and unusual punishment, and 37 states use an injection protocol similar to California's.
The case is Pacific News Service v. Woodford, 06-1793
This may be the dumbest legal argument I've ever heard.
And it's a lot cheaper too!
I'd like to know one thing:
Is there ANYTHING the ACLU doesn't like, that doesn't fall under the First Amendment, somehow?????
I think the ACLU is right. Bring back the chair, so everybody knows for damn sure the bastard is suffering.
Make the rope out of hemp and libs will be lining up around the corner for a test ride.
Is this for real? scrappleface would be proud of this one. I'm speechless.
I'll bet the aclu wouldn't have any objections if it were used for euthanasia, though.
Well, the ACLU probably believes the U.S. Constitution violates the Constitution. Screw 'em.
Since when does the First Amendment say we have the right to know everything the government knows?
I have the First Amendment right to secret CIA files, too!!
Stab them to see if they jump.
A firing squad circumvents those problems nicely.
Leave it to the ACLU to invent the most baseless legal theories that only leaves one laughing.
By golly, you took the words right out of my mouth. A proper hanging has plenty of legal precedent in America. It stood the test of time. It's instructive to people who might be thinking about murdering someone. Why monkey around with injections?
We don't need to illustrate absurdity. The ACLU is doing it quite well all on its own..../insulting vulgarity inserted here
I would like to give the ACLU a lethal injection.
Maybe if the ACLU worried about murder and rape violating the first amendment....
Well, I guess the only way to handle this is to mike him up and have Oprah interview him.
"Any last words?"
"Ouch! That stung"
"Anything else?"
"JFK's killer was ...ugh" (beeeeeeeep)
"The ACLU does not have a right to determine what method the state of California should use in carrying out the death penalty." He said the
I don't believe that is the motive of the ACLU. They want to make all executions illegal, this is just one step for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.