Skip to comments.
Colo. Teacher Defends Bush-Hitler Remarks
NewsMax ^
| 8 March 2006
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 03/07/2006 2:43:02 PM PST by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
To: Aussie Dasher
I happened to notice that this topic is 2 above another one entitled "Teacher beheaded by militants." Of course, the militants are Muslims.
Someone needs to remind our Colorado teacher that he's in no danger of being beheaded under the Bush Administration.
81
posted on
03/07/2006 5:00:55 PM PST
by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: Fizzie
Matt was too busy setting the ball back on the T-ball stand for the little commie.
82
posted on
03/07/2006 5:01:15 PM PST
by
digger48
To: American Quilter
Funny...
But I have yet to find "Hate-Bush" or Hate-Capitalism" any where in the Colorado State Teaching Standards Cirriculum for Stalinist Geography....
83
posted on
03/07/2006 5:02:57 PM PST
by
tcrlaf
To: mware
Wow, no bias there . . . just move along, folks, nothing to see . . .
I'd write my own questions too.
84
posted on
03/07/2006 5:07:31 PM PST
by
AnAmericanMother
(Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
To: Aussie Dasher
When you find yourself standing in a hole, stop digging!
85
posted on
03/07/2006 5:09:10 PM PST
by
Bean Counter
("Stout Hearts!")
To: binkdeville
Hey.... What the helll...
We already have Stalinist Geography- The Study of why Maps hate Bush...
Why Not Maoist Home Ec?? (Kill Your Mother)
Marxist Basketball? (Everybody loses)
Chomskiite Math? (2+2 Equals whatever the hell I say it is!!!"
86
posted on
03/07/2006 5:09:53 PM PST
by
tcrlaf
To: RushLake
i went to a private school, and i remember my American history teacher saying that the difference between liberals and conservatives was that liberals put the rights of people above property rights, but conservatives put property rights above people, or something like that!
on the other hand, he was against gun control and also told us about union featherbedding.
87
posted on
03/07/2006 5:12:54 PM PST
by
drhogan
To: Fizzie
He said that several students had said that Bennish bragged about being a Rastafarian...So, he's a stoner, too. Why doesn't that surprise me?
88
posted on
03/07/2006 5:20:27 PM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: California Patriot
Thomas Sowell's "Inside American Education" documents numerous ways teachers attack parental authority.
Teachers have asked third-graders, "How many of you ever wanted to beat up your parents?"
In a high school health class, students were asked, "How many of you hate your parents?"
89
posted on
03/07/2006 5:20:52 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Aussie Dasher
I thought I read somewhere he was on unpaid leave? Was I mistaken?
90
posted on
03/07/2006 5:22:26 PM PST
by
marajade
(Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
To: geezerwheezer
"You sure this guy is a teacher? Seems to me he is a complete idiot and they should check his credentials a little closer.Too many of these a$$es are allowed to teach our children, and the schools don't, or won't, do anything about it."
I believe the job title would, in fact, be "teacher." Although, you seem to have answered your own question. Indeed, way too many public school teachers...albeit, many to a lesser extent...use their classroom as a propaganda center.
An earlier post mentioned the fact that the real problem is the fact that the government is in the business of providing "education services." In truth, since the federal government got involved in public education the system, on a national level, has gone down the toilet.
The quality of overall education in American public schools is a disaster. As bad as this particular case is, it unfortunately doesn't really speak to the point of how incredibly bad the system is.
But the underlying reality is that the fundamental responsibility for educating American children belongs to the parents. When kids end up in a school and a classroom like that, the real problem is one of parental failure. Hopefully this story will help awaken a generation of lazy and uninvolved parents to the reality of what they've done to their own offspring.
91
posted on
03/07/2006 5:32:59 PM PST
by
RavenATB
(Patton was right...)
To: marajade
I thought that it was paid leave.
Then he can a book deal and meet again with that perky ...
92
posted on
03/07/2006 5:33:23 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Aussie Dasher
I listened to and read the transcript, and the guy comes across as a huge anti-semite. He kept bringing up Israel, saying that Palestinians are justified in calling Israelis terrorists.
He has a problem.
93
posted on
03/07/2006 5:59:27 PM PST
by
Reddy
To: drhogan
...that the difference between liberals and conservatives was that liberals put the rights of people above property rights, but conservatives put property rights above people, or something like that! President Taft confronted the issue of so-called Human Rights in 1912 recoginizing them for what they were, a construct meant to trump Property Rights. I have stolen a find from nicolo as follows. Taft stated:
It has been said, and it is a common platform expression, that it is well to prefer the man above the dollar, as if the preservation of property rights has some other purpose than the assistance to and the uplifting of human rights. Private property was not established in order to gratify love of some material wealth or capital. It was established as an instrumentality in the progress of civilization and the uplifting of man, and it is equality of opportunity that private property promotes by assuring to man the result of his own labor, thrift, and self-restraint. When, therefore, the demagogue mounts the platform and announces that he prefers the man above the dollar, he ought to be interrogated as to what he means thereby -- whether he is in favor of abolishing the right of the institution of private property and of taking away from the poor man the opportunity to become wealthy by the use of the abilities that God has given him, the cultivation of the virtues with which practice of self-restraint and the exercise of moral courage will fortify him.
94
posted on
03/07/2006 7:00:54 PM PST
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
To: All
I brought up the issue of his entire course's political slant as constructed by his course outline and comments of his on the John Gibson show this evening, early.
Pluggged FR while I was at it. LOL.
95
posted on
03/07/2006 7:03:46 PM PST
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
To: Aussie Dasher
Stupid leftist.
If Bush was Hitler, that goofball would have already been whisked off to the concentration camp after a 4 AM raid by the secret police, never to be seen again.
Idiot.
96
posted on
03/07/2006 7:13:06 PM PST
by
FierceDraka
("Sure as I know anything, I know this: I aim to misbehave." - Capt. Mal Reynolds)
To: Reddy
I listened to and read the transcript, and the guy comes across as a huge anti-semite. He kept bringing up Israel, saying that Palestinians are justified in calling Israelis terrorists."
That seems to be at the root of his problems.
97
posted on
03/07/2006 7:25:58 PM PST
by
Canedawg
(And then?)
To: isrul
Someone posted his syllabus on another thread. I read it over twice and can't seem to find the portion where he states he will declare the President is similar to Hitler, the people in the WTC weren't really victims and China would be justified in bombing North Carolina.
98
posted on
03/07/2006 10:14:10 PM PST
by
jess35
To: xcamel
To: KC Burke
Tsft seems to have got it exactly right!
the people who are against property rights seem to believe (or pretend to believe) that property rights mean the property (as opposed humans) has rights. we should probably refer to these rights as "rights of individuals to own property". (we don't talk about "gun rights", but the "right to own guns".) property rights are really a subset of individual rights.
opposing property rights to human rights is as silly as opposing voting rights to human rights.
100
posted on
03/08/2006 4:39:17 PM PST
by
drhogan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson