DUBAI-ITIES: hillary 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' clinton strikes again

AS the truly ego-maniacally-infantilistic male Cli'ton runs about the Earth hedonistically seeking and soaking up the public and private plaudits and plums provided him by his foreign owners operators and controllers, one is reminded that the Cli'tons collectively lack the mental capacity to operate as a team and that neither has either the intellectual or organizational ability to function alone.

Some glimpses have been provided from time to time of our first Billionaire-co-presidents' hugely-rewarding Rich/Soros/Moscow/Hammer/Li/Riady/Peking/bin-Laden-Family/Middle-East/Cocaine/Columbia connections and underpinnings but most often any would-be whistleblowers has been found face-down in a ditch.

So perhaps our best hope is that a repeat of Fort Macy Park will become a necessity as the male Clinton's infantile inability to quit his on-the-road punk rocker-like life of abandon tends to more and more run counter the the mad cow's ambitions and to risk exposing the real manifestations of evil whose product and empty glove puppet each of them is?

Let us pray .......

My criticism of the ports deal has nothing to do with hindsight. Just the opposite. The dangers for the country, the dangers for the GOP, the dangers for Bush, were self-evident.

To win this war, the Ds--and certainly the clintons--must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. (Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this.)

The ports deal uproar is really not about trade. Survival is the undeniable subtext, which means instinct and common sense rule.

Common sense tells us that there are so many layers, so many variables, no one can possibly define--much less control--all possible risks.

Common sense tells us that dubious (no pun intended) characters and countries involved in vital infrastructure increase risk by definition.

(If one listened closely to Rush Limbaugh yesterday, one would have heard him say that the ports deal doesn't increase risk appreciably. He did not say the ports deal is without increased risk.)

That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action--that they are circling the deal like vultures--should give us pause....

DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

I'm surprised I agree with... Hillary!--Captainpaintball

Don't
take
hillary's
opposition
to the
ports
deal
on
face
value.

We all
know
who the
bagman is
in
this
--uh--
relationship.

Sen. Hillary... has emerged as a leading voice in opposition to the deal, saying, "Our port security is too important to place in the hands of foreign governments."... This is more than a security problem, she says - it's "a larger problem" of ceding "some of our fiscal sovereignty."

... Hubby Bill, on the other hand, supports Dubai. Big time.

He not only supports it, he's even been advising the company on the sly on how to get around the opposition of senators like - well, Hillary.

Better still, he reportedly tried to get Dubai Ports World to hire his former mouthpiece, Joe Lockhart, as its new spokesman in Washington.

... Actually, Bill's been a big fan of Dubai for some time now.

It goes back to when that government - which actually owns Dubai Ports World - kicked in very big bucks indeed to his presidential library.

Since 2002, it's been paying him for speeches there - at $300,000 a pop.

Talk about having your cake and eating it, too: Despite his support for the company, the former prez says his wife and other critics have a legitimate beef.

This neat little arrangement keeps the Clintons covered on all sides of the issue. And it helps tuck a little boodle in the family piggy bank, too.

But then, that's the way the Clintons operate. One hand washes the other, and all that matters is advancing the Clinton self-interest.

Fiscally.

And politically.

The legendary Tammany Hall figure George Washington Plunkitt used to put it like this: "I seen my opportunities, and I took 'em."

Bill 'n Hill, too.

EXCERPT
'CLINTON VS. CLINTON' INC.
Editorial
March 4, 2006
New York Post

<< To win this war, the Ds -- and certainly the clintons -- must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. [Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this] >>

Absolutely. Agree wholeheartedly.

<< That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action -- that they are circling the deal like vultures -- should give us pause ....>>

It most certainly has me riveted.

That this one also has Michael Savage willingly shilling for such absolutely cynical and exclusively self-serving schemers as Schumer scares the Heck outta me too.

The "ports situation" has now become so Goebbels-ized and demagogued that Mr Bush's only option -- and a losing option at that, is to find a way to have "his" administration; a few hapless political appointees, that is -- and the for-generations-already anti-American and virulently anti-Republican activist-Democrat-owned permanent public-service -- find a way to reverse a commercial transaction so ordinary as to have, virtually without comment, [Except when Clinton gave Long Beach and our Panama Canal to his Peking partners] happened a hundred times previously.

I also fear that which ever way he cuts it this one may well be the issue that'll be looked back on as the Bush presidency's jumping of the shark. And will see Congressman King's and Susan Collins' et al's sacrifice of sufficient congressional seats to asher in as speaker one Nancy Pelosi.

And initiate our loss of the war for Civilization's survival.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.