[Mia T]

My criticism of the ports deal has nothing to do with hindsight. Just the opposite. The dangers for the country, the dangers for the GOP, the dangers for Bush, were self-evident.

To win this war, the Ds--and certainly the clintons--must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. (Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this.)

The ports deal uproar is really not about trade. Survival is the undeniable subtext, which means instinct and common sense rule.

Common sense tells us that there are so many layers, so many variables, no one can possibly define--much less control--all possible risks.

Common sense tells us that dubious (no pun intended) characters and countries involved in vital infrastructure increase risk by definition.

(If one listened closely to Rush Limbaugh yesterday, one would have heard him say that the ports deal doesn't increase risk appreciably. He did not say the ports deal is without increased risk.)

That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action--that they are circling the deal like vultures--should give us pause....

DUBAI-ITIES:
HILLARY 'KNOWNOTHING VICTIM' CLINTON STRIKES AGAIN

December 7, 1941+64

AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO

RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

Dear Concerned Americans,

Hillary Clinton's revisionist tome notwithstanding, 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. It is in that light that I make this not-so-modest proposal on this day, exactly 64 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

The context of our concern today--regardless of political affiliation--is Iraq and The War on Terror, but the larger fear is that our democracy may not survive.

We have the requisite machines, power and know-how to defeat the enemy in Iraq and elsewhere, but do we have the will?

In particular, do we have the will to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst?

Answerable to no one, heir apparent in her own mind, self-serving in the extreme, Hillary Clinton incarnates this insidious new threat to our survival.

What we decide to do about Missus Clinton will tell us much about what awaits us in these perilous new times.

COMPLETE LETTER

December 7, 1941+64
Mia T
AN OPEN LETTER TO TIM ROBBINS, DAVID GEFFEN, CHRIS MATTHEWS, MAUREEN DOWD + JEANINE PIRRO
RE: a not-so-modest proposal concerning hillary clinton

[Brian Allen]

<< To win this war, the Ds -- and certainly the clintons -- must not regain power. Bush must have the courage to identify and defeat the enemy in our midst. [Bush has little support today primarily because he failed to do this] >>

Absolutely. Agree wholeheartedly.

<< That the usual corrupt, self-serving clintonoid suspects (clinton, clinton, Albright, Bill Cohen, Vernon Jordan) are in on the action -- that they are circling the deal like vultures -- should give us pause ....>>

It most certainly has me riveted.

That this one also has Michael Savage willingly shilling for such absolutely cynical and exclusively self-serving schemers as Schumer scares the Heck outta me too.

The "ports situation" has now become so Goebbels-ized and demagogued that Mr Bush's only option -- and a losing option at that, is to find a way to have "his" administration; a few hapless political appointees, that is -- and the for-generations-already anti-American and virulently anti-Republican activist-Democrat-owned permanent public-service -- find a way to reverse a commercial transaction so ordinary as to have, virtually without comment, [Except when Clinton gave Long Beach and our Panama Canal to his Peking partners] happened a hundred times previously.

I also fear that which ever way he cuts it this one may well be the issue that'll be looked back on as the Bush presidency's jumping of the shark. And will see Congressman King's and Susan Collins' et al's sacrifice of sufficient congressional seats to asher in as speaker one Nancy Pelosi.

And initiate our loss of the war for Civilization's survival.