Republicans are going to win big in November, so drop the negativity!

Its right around this time when Republicans and Conservative start heading for the hills during an election year, sure as hell that our agenda and mission are doomed, doomed, doomed. The President isn’t fighting back, the Liberals have captured the agenda, the Media is out for blood, and there is nothing we can do but sit back and wait to lose big in November.

“What is the President thinking?” “How can we beat the Democrats with all this bad news happening around the world?” “The economy isn’t as good as we think!” And let’s not forget that old favorite: “We are bogged down!” Oh hell, people. Woe is us, right? We just suck right now, and we should just pack it all in and head for the damn hills, because the President has lost his mind (“he was never really a Conservative, you know?”) and is now the lamest of ducks, just waiting out the next three years until he can go back to Texas and build a library.

The port deal has killed us, Iraq aint working out like we want, and the Media-OH, the media! Its just bad out there, and it is time to start saving up our canned food, filling the tanks on our generators, getting batteries for the short-wave, and hunkering down for a nice, long period of Democratic rule.

Listen carefully, FReepers: If you believe any of the last two paragraphs, it only means that you are dumber than you look. Do you believe the polls? If you do, then you are not only dumber than you look, you are dumber than Juan Williams looks. The only people dumber, are those who think George W. Bush is done beating Democrats about the head and shoulders.

I’ve been sitting back, reading threads, looking at all the negativism, hoping that someone would say what needs to be said, but I haven’t seen it. It is like all the historical conditions surrounding recent elections have gone out the window and this time the Democrats are going to finally break through and whip our asses this time around.

If you are one of those people who believe that the Democrats are going to win on November, you probably also think I have an F-14 available to sell to you on E-Bay. Don’t be stupid. I have been saying to anyone willing to listen, that Republicans are going to PICK UP SEATS in the November elections. We are not going to lose the House, nor are we going to lose the Senate. In fact, in the Senate, we might actually gain a 60 seat majority.

The reasons that we are going to win in November are as follows: • The War on Terror • The Economy • A Nuclear Iran • The Dubai Port Deal • Hurricane Katrina • The NSA Wiretaps • Valerie Plame

Believe it or not, these are the reasons that we are actually going to win come November Some of you are thinking “But Pukin, how can that be?” Well baby, let me tell you how it ‘be’.

Each of the issues that I listed above is only a battle, an engagement or skirmish in the only real war we are fighting. It’s really very simple. We are in a serious and bloody war. Not against terrorists, not against Liberalism and the ‘progressive mindset’. It is not a war against Multi-Culturalism or against the Gay Agenda, the MSM, Hollywood or San Francisco.

When Good and Evil are at war, Evil ALWAYS appears to be winning, until it finally loses at the last moment. The only way that Evil wins, is when Good refuses to fight. I don’t mean fight, like give and take like a couple of palooka boxers either. I mean fight by not being stupid enough to fall for your enemy’s trap. Conservatives seem to always forget this once they take power. Evil appears to be winning by its mere presence in our lives. We wake up each day hoping to not run into Evil and it seems we always do, and can rarely, if ever avoid it.

As Evil grows more and more common, we get angry at Good for somehow not doing enough to protect us from it. We start thinking that Good maybe aint all that good, anyhow. Then we throw up our hands in disgust, and let Evil take over the agenda by giving up and doing nothing to stop it. Finally, as Evil gains momentum, we join it in attacking the Good, just so we don’t have to stand with the losers. This is the biggest problem we have, in that many Conservatives just don’t want to be wrong. As if I-Pukin never made a mistake? I’m sure I’m not done making them either.

In the past 40 years, whenever Democrats have won major elections they have done so by following one theme, which is the only theme that has worked, ever can work, and would work again this year, if not for the fact that a few Republicans that you have not heard from yet, actually understand this dynamic well enough to prevent it from happening again.

It is the only winning idea that has worked for Democrats since days of John F. Kennedy.

Notice all that polling going on out there? Notice how much press attention they are getting. The MSM is literally manufacturing news which they are using to depress and demoralize YOU. When the MSM takes a poll which does not result in news bad enough to worry you, what do they do? They bury it. The rule is to make sure that you don’t get any news that would cause you to have a reason for optimism.

Some have suggested that the all the negative polling is designed for the purpose of energizing liberals and helping Democratic fundraising. Nothing could be further from the truth. Democrat politicians are not as stupid as they appear on TV. They are well aware that no amount of energy or dollars from their base can defeat the Conservative agenda. They learned that hard lesson again from the defeats of Al Gore and John Kerry.

They had big money, enthusiastic supporters, the MSM on their side and what happened? They got whipped. Yeah, you can talk about Gore winning the popular vote, and all that, but that fool also lost his home state. In short, those who knew him best voted against his crazy ass.

Some of you are angry that these past elections were so close, but if someone could actually convince me that George Bush broke my bass boat so that I could not go fishing this weekend, and that it wont work again unless my taxes are raised, well………?

When Bill Clinton was elected it was due to primarily to the fact that Conservatives were angry with Bush senior. They thought they had good reason for their anger at the time, but I wonder how many Conservatives, had they known what the Clintons would do to our nation would have still voted against George H. Bush, or even worse, for the little General Perot?

Democrats win ONLY when they can divide Conservatives into separate camps of angry voters. Some of you will stay home; some will vote for a losing alternative if there is one, just so you can show your ‘dissatisfaction’. So, while you got eight years of Clintons, you sure SHOWED um’ they can’t mess with YOU, dammit!

Some of you say, “Well Pukin, we cant count on Bush any more, he spends like a drunken sailor, and he is for open borders, and he wont protect the ports, and he wont wash my dishes, and he doesn’t pay me enough, and my kids don’t like me, and ………..”

I have never seen so much anti-Bush sentiment on Free Republic like I have in the past couple of weeks, with the attacks on the so-called Bush-bots (a great tool to whip out when you have no argument or facts to share) and it makes me wonder why some of you EVER supported Bush in the first place.

I recall that when Bush was running against Al Gore, he made a few pledges on a few issues. None of which had to do with Terrorism. Correct me if I am wrong, but I think you were promised a Tax-cut, Social Security reform, originalist Judges, a better Economy and honor and dignity in the White House. Did I leave something out? Now, as far as I know, this is the best Economy the U.S has ever had, we got not one, but THREE Tax-cuts, Bush certainly attempted Social Security Reform and do I have to even mention Roberts and Alito? “But Pukin, what about Miers! Doesn’t that prove that Bush has abandoned us?”

As is well known, I sort of lost my mind over the Miers issue too. I was all over the place on that, but have come to understand that Miers was never going to be on the Supreme Court, and was only a ‘Stalking Horse’ to draw Liberal fire away from other issues and expose their opposition research against better candidates. I believe it. You don’t have to. We got Alito, and that is what matters.

On the last pledge, the one about honor and dignity? I seriously doubt that even with the most powerful of microscopes, anyone is going to find any of Dubya’s DNA on any of the sinks in the White House bathrooms, and Laura Bush is nothing like the shrill, shrieking shrew that ultimately lost out to the chunky Monica L. in the battle for the affections of Cheeseburger Willie.

Not to mention the fact that he managed to corral Saddam and prevent any domestic terrorism since 911. So which is it? Can you not count on Bush, or can he not count on you?

Did you enjoy the Sunday shows this week? Pretty dreary stuff huh? The sky is falling and all that? One thing that Bush understands that a lot of you do not, is that you folks are the only ones watching that garbage. The Bush Administration understands that 98% of the country is not going to be spending a beautiful Sunday morning planted in front of the tube catching every word that Timmah Russert throws against a wall to see what can stick.

This is the first Sunday of the month, which means that about 50 million or so people got more from their communion wafer than they got from Steffie about what they should be concerned about. If you were one of the 6 people who watched Bob Shieffer, you can take comfort in knowing that about as many people as ingested Botulism from canned food today, but are still better off from their poison than you are from yours.

Everything you see on your TV during this phase of the political cycle is aimed right at you, Mr. Conservative-Political-Junkie. It is meant to piss you off, make you depressed, make you help foment that wave of negativism that catches up others and brings them to that place where together you start actually believing that things are as bad at they appear. Don’t you ever wonder how all these pollsters manage to find all these angry Republicans who have abandoned Bush between the hours of 10am and 4pm (when 99% of polling calls are done)? Are you one of the few, proud and brave who think that everyone who calls C-Span is a former-Conservative-gone-liberal over the policies of George W. Bush too?

If I believed what I heard from C-Span callers, I might also be inclined to believe that George Bush is selling our ports to the A-Rabs so that he, Ken Lay and Haliburton can enrich themselves by selling a Gitmo-toilet-soaked Koran to each of the terrorists as they climb out of UAE-screened cargo crates on their way to stand with the other terrorists waiting outside your local Home Depot for an opportunity to sneak into your home and disconnect your cable so that you wont hear the CNN warning about the Global-Warming-generated Tsunami that is coming to kill you on behalf of Al Qaeda.

I don’t believe what I hear from C-Span callers. You shouldn’t either. I also don’t believe polls which do not reflect a 40-40-20 (Republican-Democrat-Independent) split among LIKELY voters who have a job. But you won’t see those polls coming from the Media, and you won’t even see them from Rasmussen until around September, because that is when the ratio of people who don’t hang up on pollsters reaches better than 10%. The only poll that I would be paying any attention to right now is the Battlefield Poll (Goeas and Lake) because it is the only poll that has any potential for an accurate assessment of what is going on in politics right now.

We are going to win in November because Democrats politicians are stupid enough to believe these polls even though they know they are bogus. They believe them, because they don’t have any other choice, accept to go out and raise money while putting forward a positive agenda for America. Democrats and Liberals by their very nature cannot have a positive plan and message for America. Every Democratic message you have seen for the past 40 years is as follows: “Vote for me, or you are doomed”.

In the same way that if the Democrats lose 10% of the black vote, they can’t win, the same is true in reverse if they can get 10% of Conservatives to just stay home. So ask yourself; are you doomed? If the UAE writes checks to American stevedores working on the terminals on OUR ports instead of the Brits that do now, are you doomed? If Valerie Plame can’t make a dime except on the cover of Vanity Fair, are you doomed? If Michael Brown lacks the balls to force Governor Blanc-stare to tell Mayor-in-the-hood Nagin that black people don’t mind riding in the back of the bus if they are otherwise about to DROWN, are you doomed?

When you have the media yelling “It’s Civil War!” every time some insurgent goes for his promised 72 pure ones; when so-called Conservatives on the Radio attack the administration for ratings dollars; when washed-up pundits looking for government jobs and media attention sell their opinions to the highest bidder to in a desperate bid to stay in the limelight and it is left to the afore-mentioned dopey Juan Williams to suggest that the attacks on the President are just a bit out of line, even then, are you doomed?

The Democrat Party is at this very moment committing political suicide once again, because they have decided that they will not put forward a positive plan for what THEY would do for America if they were to regain power. Back in early December, Howard Dean (their standard-bearer) promised Tim Russert that Democrats would put forward their plan for America in January 2006. Remember that? But then, John Murtha, looking to insulate himself from his own Defense Appropriations Illegalities Probe, proclaimed that the troops should come home now! Thinking that any attacks on his character would be seen as revenge against his (convenient) war stance, he only gave Democrats a spanking when they got clobbered in public reaction by their weakness on Security.

The “Plan” that Dean was to put forward was close enough to the Murtha position to make it impossible to use as the Democrat platform. Democrats have spent the last 3 months arguing among themselves on what kind of plan they could put forward that would not make them look weak on Security and Defense. They have decided that the best Democrat plan is NO DEMOCRAT PLAN. Their strategy is to use their friends in the MSM to bash Bush on a constant basis, until enough of YOU peel away from Republicans and allow Democrats to win some elections.

I repeat: The Democrats have decided that they can’t risk telling the country what they will do for America if they win, so their plan is to make sure that enough of you are pissed off enough at the President and Congress to stay home to insure that Republicans lose. The bad news is that a heck of a lot of you folks are playing right into their hands. The good news is that there are not enough of you to really affect things that way, and the people who will decide this election are not paying attention to all this noise and wont until around September and none of what you see and hear from the Media and the pundits and even the Conservatives-gone-soft on your radios is going to matter.

It amazes me that when Conservatism is one vote away from winning the 40 year battle over Roe-v-Wade, some you would risk that opportunity with a Democrat-controlled Congress because you don’t want some Mexican citizen to have the legal right to pick your Strawberries. Do you expect Senate confirmation hearings for Bush’s next nominee to be scheduled around those Impeachment proceedings? Sure. And you are just going to love the Democrat border protection plan: “We’ll give you a driver’s license Mr. Illegal Alien, if you just promise you will drive back to Mexico after work every night. Deal?”)

I repeat again that current events don’t matter, because we are going to win. We won’t lose the House or Senate; in fact we will gain seats. The Democrats will not be able to sustain a message that their lack of a plan is better than the Republican plan. When the 90% tunes into political news that they will avoid all through the summer, a majority of them will look in their wallets and vote Republican. They will note that they have not been attacked by terrorists in almost 5 years; that the UAE has not let in a single bad-guy, (because that deal is going through. Choke on it); that the U.S. will have either bombed Iran back into oil-dependency, or announced plans to do so; and/or innumerable other events that will shape the electorate prior to November.

The issues I listed above are what allow Democrats to be over-confident and willing to rely on the strategy of no-plan beats a plan. They have decided that they can sustain Media Bush-bashing all the way to the elections, and not have to risk turning off voters through an admission that they only intend to do what Liberals do in power, which is to steal and spend more hard-earned American money and give it to those who would punish you for ever daring to free yourself from government dependency.

Hell, I don’t agree with everything my Momma does, but if you want to call me a ‘Momma-bot’, I guess I’ll take the name proudly. Get it?

Had Bush campaigned on a promise to make me happy every damn day, agree with me or lose my respect, and agree that Michael Savage knows more about running the country than the President does, then I guess I would have to consider staying home on Election Day.

You are correct. A lot can happen between now and election day, but it won't shift on anything said in the original post.

I think the author makes a few assumptions that are questionable. One if the unspoken idea that naturally republicans are stronger on defense than democrats. That's not necessarily true. I think the dems are running 15-20 retired military types in House elections: it's difficult to characterize those guys as weak on defense, provided that they don't talk weak on defense.

Since the Dubai stumble, the democrats for the first time in as far back as anyone can remember poll better on national security issues. That dovetails with another assumption the article makes: that the polls are broadly rigged against the GOP. I think there is a slight liberal bias in polls, but how can it be that when the president was doing well, all the major polls showed him doing well, and when he is doing poorly, all the major polls show him doing poorly?

The polls, despite wholesale Freeper denial, are on balance accurate. There is an astonishing, and unhealthy, resistance to bad news on FR. During the impeachment of Clinton, polls consistently showed that the american public didn't support removal of the president. Freepdom projected its own disdain for the president onto the american public. When the results came in, it was clear that Freepdom wasn't just wrong: it was remarkably wrong.

The idea that Bush will poll better and the GOP will gain ground in 8 months based on some issues where they are polling terribly today isn't very reassuring. Talk of good and evil notwithstanding, there is no broad public perception of the dems as the agents of evil. Maybe misguided. Maybe befuddled. Maybe inept. Not evil, though. Banking on an overstated theme that isn't really accurate in the first place is very sloppy thinking that won't lead to success.

If the GOP does well in 2006 (and I think they could, but you'd never know it now), it won't be for any of the reasons listed in the essay.

"Well, I am a pragmatist, which by definition around here makes me a Bushbot.

Huh? I think your defintion is a little skewed. here is how dictionary.com defines it:

1. Philosophy. A movement consisting of varying but associated theories, originally developed by Charles S. Peirce and William James and distinguished by the doctrine that the meaning of an idea or a proposition lies in its observable practical consequences.

2. A practical, matter-of-fact way of approaching or assessing situations or of solving problems.

A pragmatist would be willing to question the President and do or support whats right even if they disagreed with the president rather then rubber stamp anything he does which is what a Bushbot would do.

Before Cheney was picked for VP, he lived in Dallas, TX for several years. He and Lynne only visited Wyoming. His official residence including his voting precinct was in Texas. When he agreed to run, he had to establish his Wyoming residence, as the President and VP cannot be official residents of the same state. It is very easy and quick to establish that legality, and so he did. Most likely they will live in TX once again when he retires.

Friends close, enemies closer

No, Newt.

Newt was spanked severely by the Clintons, '95 onward.

It's one thing to keep your enemies close. It's another thing to bend over and have your enemies slap -- it.

That of course is true. A pragmatist would be willing to questioning the president.

A pragmatist is also be willing to recognize when a president is being pragmatic.

2006 is just prep for 2008

I like your posts, so with all due respect, that is wrong.

It IS all about 06. Incremental changes and advance are how the socialist agenda has gained so much in the good old USA.

We need to look at one battle at a time. - and win those.

Now, who said this? - "we must achieve communism by non communist means?"

Don't need to. - What I will do is put it right in your face, and that is worth far more to me than an insignificant amount of money, given my current economic situation.

Well, that's not very considerate. It's not going to be worth much to me to rub your face in it after the election. Everybody on FR will be glum, and I-told-you-sos will be neither welcome nor therapeutic. On the other hand, in the highly unlikely event that I'm wrong I'll be only too happy to have my nose rubbed in it.

What amount of money would you consider significant? I've got a fair amount of sporting blood.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.