Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: 'Long war' is breaking down into tedium
Chicago Sun-Times ^
| 03/05/06
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 03/05/2006 6:44:19 AM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: daviddennis
Anyone know what having to take laptops and cameras out of their cases does to help homeland security? I think it does the same thing that forcing someone to walk barefoot through the metal detectors does.
41
posted on
03/05/2006 10:17:01 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Pokey78
42
posted on
03/05/2006 10:19:19 AM PST
by
hattend
(Keep Drinking Until Nagin Makes Sense)
To: caveat emptor
You missed Steyn's point. They use the Patriot Act as an excuse to request a finger print. If it their own policy to require a fingerprint to cash a check, then let them be up front and state so, but don't lie.
43
posted on
03/05/2006 10:19:49 AM PST
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: Pokey78
44
posted on
03/05/2006 10:22:00 AM PST
by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: ClaireSolt
He's writing it though, not cashing it.
45
posted on
03/05/2006 10:37:11 AM PST
by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: Pokey78
"Even the "friendliest" Arab regimes tend to be a bunch of duplicitous shysters: King Hussein sided with Saddam in the Gulf war, Mubarak and the House of Saud are the cause of much of our present woes."
Yes!!!! Down with ROP and up with ROJ!
Please put me on the Steyn Ping List. Thank you! :)
46
posted on
03/05/2006 10:40:49 AM PST
by
Chgogal
(The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
To: livius
We're in Los Angeles. I know what you mean. Some people, many people, just cannot stand to face Reality head-on. Nevertheless, it continues to exist. Look at the numbers of 9/11 Democrats who call Rush. I think people are starting to get it. Except in San Fran, where they believe the bad guys would never hurt THEM.
I see that Cindy Sheehan was in our neck of the woods last week. Too bad I didn't know ... I could be in jail today, celebrating having annoyed her.
47
posted on
03/05/2006 10:50:54 AM PST
by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: Pokey78
Most sentient beings have been aware that there is, to put it mildly, a large element of evasion about this basic narrative, but only now is it being explicitly rejected by all sides. William F. Buckley and George Will have more or less respectfully detached themselves from the insane idealism of shoving liberty and democracy down people's throats whether they want it or not. That's the most antiwar I've heard Steyn sound.
48
posted on
03/05/2006 11:06:43 AM PST
by
Huck
(space for rent)
To: bboop
LOL! It might almost be worth it...
49
posted on
03/05/2006 11:31:23 AM PST
by
livius
To: mylife
I imagine it helps when people say no. A lot of this stuff is unconscious. People make up forms and ask a lot of stuff they don't need. I think that is often very true of new patient forms at the doctor.
To: caveat emptor; Clock King
Steyn never mentions fingerprints for your bank. That was another Freeper.
51
posted on
03/05/2006 12:11:04 PM PST
by
SunTzuWu
To: aculeus
So what? There were millions of "moderate" Germans in the 1930s, and a fat lot of good they did us or them.
Apples & oranges,
52
posted on
03/05/2006 12:42:50 PM PST
by
Valin
(Purple Fingers Rule!)
To: Pokey78
Thanks Pokey.
The quagmire isn't in Iraq but at home.
'nuff said.
FMCDH(BITS)
53
posted on
03/05/2006 12:50:35 PM PST
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: Pokey78
businesses have been getting progressively more and more nosy over the last 15 years or so.
for cash transactions, it is now not uncommon for clerks to ask for personal information to add to the database.
screw that.
I used to argue about policy and law with them, but have instead started simply answering with "My name? Johnny Cash. My phone number? (areacode)382-5968." (look at the buttons, think rude, and figure it out)
54
posted on
03/05/2006 2:10:21 PM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Pokey78
To: King Prout
My phone number? (areacode)382-5968." (look at the buttons, think rude, and figure it out) What? R-I-N-G-O-F-F-I-R-E?
56
posted on
03/05/2006 2:27:03 PM PST
by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: Pokey78
I have shared the frustration with Bush's maddening locution "religion of peace" but let's remember a couple of facts - we have 160,000 servicepeople in a Moslem country and we don't need to have the terror war expanded into a war of religion with them in place. We all saw how some silly cartoons were ramped up by the unscrupulous to inflame a good part of the world. If we have to pretend in public that there are millions of moderate Moslems out there then so be it. George Will doesn't have responsibility for the troops' safety - but George Bush does.
To: Revolting cat!
naw... though if I felt like spoofing the area code as well as the number that'd work... but would not be satisfactorily rude.
58
posted on
03/05/2006 2:37:46 PM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: Clock King; SunTzuWu
You missed Steyn's point.
You both seemed to have missed my point. Bureaucrats are ubiquitous these days, as is their, ahh, abuse of power. Steyn took what are commonplace occurrences in dealing with just about any bureaucracy, and used them to argue against the Patriot Act.
Annoy a nurse when asking about the condition of a close relative in hospital and you may get stiff-armed with patient confidentiality yada yada yada. Rub a cop the wrong way while getting a simple traffic ticket and you never know where it may end up. Catch an examiner for a driver's license on a bad hair day and you may be back again the next day hoping to get a different examiner.
Check out these two guys if you still don't understand what I'm talking about.
To: Pokey78
This is a great article.
The Patriot Act is not alarming in and of itself, and not alarming from a law enforcement or governmental perspective. It is, however, alarming how much credence we give to people who manipulate breathless press reports and leftist shrills to further their own quest for information. What's worse, that we let them. That should be flat out illegal if it isn't already.
I think ALL of us need to be more vigilant in making sure that we don't allow people to do all sorts of things under the guise of "It's in the Patriot Act, don't you just hate it! Now, sign here."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson