Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I am sure there will be more lawsuits filed by outraged groups that know they were spied on. Heck, I figure that at least one third of Portlanders think they were "spyed" on also.
1 posted on 03/04/2006 9:07:15 AM PST by crazyhorse691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: crazyhorse691
Sounds to me they are trying to look for an out, to cover the Times' derriere in the leak investigation


2 posted on 03/04/2006 9:16:25 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crazyhorse691
The Oregon suit was filed on behalf of the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, an Oregon nonprofit, and Wendell Belew and Asim Ghafoor, both U.S. citizens and attorneys for the group.

So what do they hope to accomplish? If they were "spied" upon its already happened and cant be undone. And lets face it, any Islamic Charity is suspect anymore. The friggin Moonfollowers have more charities than anyone else, yet 90% of its adherents are dirt poor. Where is the money going?

3 posted on 03/04/2006 9:17:24 AM PST by cardinal4 (The 9-11 Commission, America's National Shame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crazyhorse691
"Heck, I figure that at least one third of Portlanders think they were "spyed" on also."

I'm surprised it's only a third. About half think President Bush conspired to make 9/11 happen to justify invading Iraq. /Sarc
4 posted on 03/04/2006 9:19:05 AM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crazyhorse691
I am sure there will be more lawsuits filed by outraged groups that know they were spied on.

Someone help me out here - back when I was taking college classes I was taught that nobody can sue the US Government unless the Government agrees to be sued - e.g. entering into a contract with the Government and therefore bound by contractual clauses. What grounds are these people suing on and how do they have standing? Is this "Islamic charity" going to claim the "unreasonable search" routine under the 4th Amendment, when for all we know the CIC had every right to believe this charity may have been tied to Al Quada terrorists and operating perfectly within his CIC duties? Where does this all end - we have the NYT and MSM to thank for this crap, and it certainly is diverting our attention from the real game - the WOT.

6 posted on 03/04/2006 9:48:22 AM PST by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crazyhorse691; oregon; abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; ...

Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

10 posted on 03/08/2006 10:33:26 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: crazyhorse691
My opinion of why the Bush administration avoids getting warrants is because they know the system is full of sympathizers, spies, and leakers. These lawsuits are fishing expeditions by terrorist sympathizers.
12 posted on 03/09/2006 6:58:12 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson