Someone help me out here - back when I was taking college classes I was taught that nobody can sue the US Government unless the Government agrees to be sued - e.g. entering into a contract with the Government and therefore bound by contractual clauses. What grounds are these people suing on and how do they have standing? Is this "Islamic charity" going to claim the "unreasonable search" routine under the 4th Amendment, when for all we know the CIC had every right to believe this charity may have been tied to Al Quada terrorists and operating perfectly within his CIC duties? Where does this all end - we have the NYT and MSM to thank for this crap, and it certainly is diverting our attention from the real game - the WOT.
Al Haramain is in fact tied to Osama bin Laden. I keep track of them while I was there from 1999 to 2004. I have documents showing they were active in Kosovo and that they are blacklisted and Identified having ties to Al Qaeda. This is a fact...........
Tom
Sorry about the English...."I kept track of Al Haramain" which was my own interest as this was not part of my job description. They absolutely can be described as having direct ties to Al Qaeda. They have access to large bank accounts and are linked to radical teachings of Islam.