Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

French special forces officer killed in Afghanistan
afp ^ | 3/4/06 | na

Posted on 03/04/2006 7:11:46 AM PST by Flavius

PARIS (AFP) - A French special forces officer was killed in clashes with Taliban forces in southern Afghanistan, the defence ministry and the military said in a joint statement. ADVERTISEMENT click here

The statement gave no details of the death of the officer of a marine commando unit, the second French soldier to be killed in action in Afghanistan.

Some 200 French special forces troops under US command are fighting guerrillas of the former Taliban regime in southeast Afghanistan, the statement said.

Defence Minister Michele Alliot-Marie had sent her condolences to the family of the dead officer, who was not identified.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: KeyLargo

"Was he shot in the back while fleeing?

What are the French doing there? Are they doing some cover-up work for their government?"


i dislike the french as much as the next guy, but this guy was fighting on our side and died. Their government might suck, but your post is in incredibly bad taste and you need to post an apology.


21 posted on 03/04/2006 8:09:26 AM PST by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: starfish923; KeyLargo
I've been reading threads on FR for the last three months or so about how NATO nations and others are taking over responsibility for the Kandahar region. I'm sure the so-called "MSM" has been the source for some of the threads.
22 posted on 03/04/2006 8:12:00 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

"I still am curious as to why the French have sent military to Afghanistan."

because it is a NATO operation and a ton of NATO countries have troops there.


23 posted on 03/04/2006 8:13:09 AM PST by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Will Chirac attend the funeral?


24 posted on 03/04/2006 8:13:42 AM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heatseeker

keep in mind that is pre-revolution france and they were just doing that to piss off the british. by that logic the british, or first enemies are not good friends. France really took a turn for the worse with the 3rd, 4th and 5th republics


25 posted on 03/04/2006 8:17:06 AM PST by minus_273
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
I still am curious as to why the French have sent military to Afghanistan.

Same reason every other country in Europe has troops there -- to defeat the Taliban and destroy the Bin Laden network.

26 posted on 03/04/2006 8:23:32 AM PST by Alter Kaker ("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
God be with his family...having said that (now where did I [ut the flame-proof suit? Ah, here it is!)

The statement gave no details of the death of the officer of a marine commando unit, the second French soldier to be killed in action in Afghanistan.

Is it time now for ze French to declare Afghanistan to be "ze quagmire?" In fact, does the French language have a word for "quagmire?"

Ok, flame away.

27 posted on 03/04/2006 8:24:07 AM PST by JRios1968 (A DUmmie troll's motto: "Non cogito, ergo zot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: leadpenny; KeyLargo
I've been reading threads on FR for the last three months or so about how NATO nations and others are taking over responsibility for the Kandahar region. I'm sure the so-called "MSM" has been the source for some of the threads.

Then I MISSED them. Good on the MSM and our freeper-posters.

It's always PART of the MSM agenda to put SOME stories front page, others 3rd page and other buried back in the obits. Also, how MUCH coverage, photos, background, etc., tells me how interested the news source really is in their coverage.

It's also part of life that some stories get buried naturally during bigger, more important events.

The MSM knows this and MIGHT put out those stories again, just so these stories get their due place in the sun, so to speak.
I think that it's EXTREMELY important for us, as a nation, to KNOW unequivocally who our allies are, that is, who the NATO nations--read that as European nations--are who are fighting and dying WITH our soldiers. They ought to be given due accolades for sending THEIR young soldiers to help. It would also be very good to know who the Asian countries might be as well.
It's ALWAYS and ALWAYS good to know who our allies are, even if the help is only in communtications or supplies, don't you agree? (Rhetorical)
Sorry, I's just so picky, picky, picky.

Thanks for the heads-up.

29 posted on 03/04/2006 8:28:40 AM PST by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968
In fact, does the French language have a word for "quagmire?"

Mais oui, sans doute!
I found two words...and I have only a paperback dictionary. I took French in college, decades ago.

quagmire = la fondriere (reverse accent on the first e) and le marecage (accent on the first e)

30 posted on 03/04/2006 8:33:36 AM PST by starfish923 (Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

"It's always PART of the MSM agenda"

It's always part of every news outlet agenda. They call them news editors. Until you take humans out of the process, it will be that way. I don't get the fixation on "the MSM." In fact, I don't know what "the MSM" is. I've asked others to define "the MSM" with examples and that's when it seems to get tough. I won't attempt to put you on the spot.


31 posted on 03/04/2006 8:37:00 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

Merci!


32 posted on 03/04/2006 8:52:33 AM PST by JRios1968 (A DUmmie troll's motto: "Non cogito, ergo zot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: archy

Absolutely.

My ex brother-in-law was a French Naval Captain, and his brother is a fighter pilot (currently stationed as NATO liaison in Norfolk).

Don't confuse the French military officer class (and they are a class with a tradition much like the Southern military tradition in the US) with the slimy politicians and head-in-the-sand civilian ostriches of the rest of France.


33 posted on 03/04/2006 8:58:10 AM PST by Philistone (Turning lead into gold...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

Look, doofus, the French have had hundreds of special forces troops and others with us in Afghanistan for years now. French air force and navy have also helped us in and out of the region doing counterterror stuff.


34 posted on 03/04/2006 9:03:04 AM PST by Disinterested Observer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: laconic
the French Army veterans of Indochina

Most of whom were not French. The bulk of the 'French' troops in Indochina were either colonial or German. The officers, such as those who thought up Dien Bien Phu were, of course, French.

35 posted on 03/04/2006 10:25:12 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
because it is a NATO operation and a ton of NATO countries have troops there.

France isn't a member of the NATO military alliance. (It does participate on the political side.)

36 posted on 03/04/2006 10:27:51 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: minus_273
You're right about that. Nevertheless "a friend in need is a friend indeed" and we were in need at that point; without the temporary services of the French fleet we could not have gained the victory at Yorktown.
37 posted on 03/04/2006 10:56:44 AM PST by Heatseeker (Never underestimate the left's tendency to underestimate us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

You do realise that French forces have been operating in Afghanistan since 2001? French Air Force and Naval aircraft were pounding Taleban and Al Q forces back in 2001. Only last year French Air Force strike aircraft were bombing anti-Coaliton forces.


38 posted on 03/04/2006 11:05:04 AM PST by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: laconic

Horrendous tactics (trying to fight Blitzkreig the same way WW1 was fought), slow command and control and in general sloppy leadership unfamiliar with mechanized warfare were the leading reasons the French really sucked in WW2. Many many died valiantly because the French failed to slap that Austrian Corporal when he waltzed into the Sudetenland. France had a treaty with the Checkoslovakia that they should have honored.


39 posted on 03/04/2006 12:31:56 PM PST by When do we get liberated? ((God save us from the whining, useless, irrelevent left...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: When do we get liberated?

Actually Colonel DeGaulle fought about as well as any French officer in WW2, as much as I dislike him as an anti-US ingrate. Had the French Army more officers like him, its doubtful that the blitzkrieg of France would have succeeded.


40 posted on 03/04/2006 12:43:56 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson