Posted on 03/03/2006 9:36:59 AM PST by Stellar Dendrite
The 45-day delay for more investigation into the United Arab Emirates-owned Dubai Ports World looked last week like a port in a political storm. Now it looks more like a trap.
The 45-day review at best freezes the debate in place, preserving a status quo in which the White House is taking a political pounding. At worst, it allows the opponents of the deal, who have the offensive, to keep picking away at it, whether by airing (and distorting) past Coast Guard concerns about DP World or highlighting the company's participation in the Arab boycott of Israel. The White House, incredibly, is on the wrong side of a 70-20 national-security issue that has more resonance than the Patriot Act and the National Security Agency wiretapping program. This is simply a debacle, shaping up as a lose-lose for Bush. If he loses on the Hill, he will be humiliated and identified with the unpopular deal. If he wins, its hard to see how he won't be doing so against the grain of public opinion, harming himself on national security in a cause having DP World manage the terminals that is not of fundamental importance.
The deal is unpopular among Republicans almost 60 percent of whom oppose it, according to polls. The ports controversy is actually wreaking the damage on Bush's political base that the Harriet Miers nomination only threatened to inflict. Congressional Republicans arent going to let Sen. Chuck Schumer, who will surely find a reason to oppose the deal no matter what, get to their right on port security, and many of them actively want to split with the president on a high-profile issue.
Although many of our friends have sincere doubts about the deal, we have yet to hear a compelling argument against it. So it is with regret that we say the deal should be jettisoned. That seems to be where the trajectory of this controversy is headed anyway, and the sooner it happens the less painful it will be for the administration. There are many more important issues on which Bush should, nay must, spend his dwindling political capital, the war in Iraq foremost among them. To realize this is to prioritize, not to panic.
Nixing the deal will be a blow to our relationship with the UAE, but Bush should get credit from them for fighting for the deal and sticking up for Dubai. Surely there will be some subtle way to compensate the UAE in another area. Bush's credibility with Congress after his veto threat and saber rattling will take a blow. But not as large a blow as he would suffer if he kept fighting and lost (or if the issue were to stay red hot and contribute to a GOP loss of Congress). Republican members of Congress will surely be relieved to put the controversy behind them.
The technicalities of how to do that will have to be worked out, but the 45-day delay itself shows that, in this case, the legalities can be massaged to suit the politics. Whatever the exit strategy ultimately is, it won't be pretty. But nothing about this episode has been edifying. Bush should get out as soon as he can.
Uh dirt could you ping me when you mention me. It's called FReepiquette.
Something buchananites are woefully lacking in, IMO.
It's all about you, Howlin, eh?
I did not mention you by name, and instead gave RM general advice about how to deal with those trying to provoke flame wars. And he agreed with that advice. But I guess you'd rather just have a spat. But I'm really not willing to play any more.
Anybody who reads this thread can see it was you and your pal RM who started throwing the crap.
I'm happy with that.
Are you having a hissy fit?
When you stop making personal attacks and goading flame wars, I'll consider you worth any consideration of ettiquete, Dane.
Oh, when he said "Dane," he didn't mean YOU "Dane." It was another "Dane" he was talking about/to.
You keep making my point for me, Howlin.
Well gee if they(UAE) were true to their "priciples" they wouldn't let the infidels in.
But they do. Oh That's right they only do it for the money like your other buchannite bogeyman, the joooooosss.
You only just noticed?
They are not the manliest of men.
Yep Dirt does get indignant when caught.
Tell the truth, you're Anderson Cooper, aren't you?
some of the best advice i've seen yet, dirtboy
Surely there will be some subtle way to compensate the UAE in another area.
Or, better yet, wave at them. Cheerfully. With some number of your fingers extended, of course.
We may assume the entire editorial staff of NRO and Duncan Hunter, the man they were accusing of homosexuality during the Miers affair, are the newest Heroes of the Whine All The Time Choir. That will change. The only constant about the Choir is their knee jerk bitchiness about EVERYTHING. After all when their only political principal is to be perpetually pissed, they have NO loyalty, intellectual credibility nor moral resiliency.
As if you had any......
Dig your tagline.
"Is there FReep poll for this?"
The second FR poll (available on the FR home page) has a 55-35 split (approx.) in favor of the deal. The first poll's results were the other way around.
The deal is unpopular among Republicans almost 60 percent of whom oppose it, according to polls.
By "homosexuality", do you mean like the leader of the Hamiltonian Nat'l Committee, Ken Mehlman? Or the Cheney daughter?
Actually, I've never heard those rumors about Duncan Hunter. Too bad you choose to malign a distinguished veteran and happily married man with two sons.
I see you equate independent thinking with "whining". Standard operating practice amongst the Hamiltonian apparatchiks.
S.D. - I see Debbie Schlussel has made the list.
I'm beginning to realize how conservatives felt in 1976, when Ronald Reagan was voted down in favor of a real Republican, Gerald Ford.
You tell 'em, Johnnie. The Titanic is unsinkable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.