Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dump the Deal (Editors of National Review Online)
National Review ^ | 3-3-2006 | Editors of National Review

Posted on 03/03/2006 9:36:59 AM PST by Stellar Dendrite

The 45-day delay for more investigation into the United Arab Emirates-owned Dubai Ports World looked last week like a port in a political storm. Now it looks more like a trap.

The 45-day review at best freezes the debate in place, preserving a status quo in which the White House is taking a political pounding. At worst, it allows the opponents of the deal, who have the offensive, to keep picking away at it, whether by airing (and distorting) past Coast Guard concerns about DP World or highlighting the company's participation in the Arab boycott of Israel. The White House, incredibly, is on the wrong side of a 70-20 national-security issue that has more resonance than the Patriot Act and the National Security Agency wiretapping program. This is simply a debacle, shaping up as a lose-lose for Bush. If he loses on the Hill, he will be humiliated and identified with the unpopular deal. If he wins, it’s hard to see how he won't be doing so against the grain of public opinion, harming himself on national security in a cause — having DP World manage the terminals — that is not of fundamental importance.

The deal is unpopular among Republicans — almost 60 percent of whom oppose it, according to polls. The ports controversy is actually wreaking the damage on Bush's political base that the Harriet Miers nomination only threatened to inflict. Congressional Republicans aren’t going to let Sen. Chuck Schumer, who will surely find a reason to oppose the deal no matter what, get to their right on port security, and many of them actively want to split with the president on a high-profile issue.

Although many of our friends have sincere doubts about the deal, we have yet to hear a compelling argument against it. So it is with regret that we say the deal should be jettisoned. That seems to be where the trajectory of this controversy is headed anyway, and the sooner it happens the less painful it will be for the administration. There are many more important issues on which Bush should, nay must, spend his dwindling political capital, the war in Iraq foremost among them. To realize this is to prioritize, not to panic.

Nixing the deal will be a blow to our relationship with the UAE, but Bush should get credit from them for fighting for the deal and sticking up for Dubai. Surely there will be some subtle way to compensate the UAE in another area. Bush's credibility with Congress — after his veto threat and saber rattling — will take a blow. But not as large a blow as he would suffer if he kept fighting and lost (or if the issue were to stay red hot and contribute to a GOP loss of Congress). Republican members of Congress will surely be relieved to put the controversy behind them.

The technicalities of how to do that will have to be worked out, but the 45-day delay itself shows that, in this case, the legalities can be massaged to suit the politics. Whatever the exit strategy ultimately is, it won't be pretty. But nothing about this episode has been edifying. Bush should get out as soon as he can.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ignornacecacus; neoisolationist; nro; pollsnotprincipals; port; ports; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: dirtboy
Dane's the one who pinged you in here as part of his exchange with RM. Take it up with Dane.

Uh dirt could you ping me when you mention me. It's called FReepiquette.

Something buchananites are woefully lacking in, IMO.

61 posted on 03/03/2006 12:39:16 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Oh, let's see: you replied to RM to a post he made to me, talking about

It's all about you, Howlin, eh?

I did not mention you by name, and instead gave RM general advice about how to deal with those trying to provoke flame wars. And he agreed with that advice. But I guess you'd rather just have a spat. But I'm really not willing to play any more.

62 posted on 03/03/2006 12:40:33 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Now if you'd only show as much concern about the FR rules regarding personal attacks

Anybody who reads this thread can see it was you and your pal RM who started throwing the crap.

I'm happy with that.

63 posted on 03/03/2006 12:40:40 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Are you having a hissy fit?


64 posted on 03/03/2006 12:41:17 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Uh dirt could you ping me when you mention me. It's called FReepiquette.

When you stop making personal attacks and goading flame wars, I'll consider you worth any consideration of ettiquete, Dane.

65 posted on 03/03/2006 12:41:43 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dane

Oh, when he said "Dane," he didn't mean YOU "Dane." It was another "Dane" he was talking about/to.


66 posted on 03/03/2006 12:42:10 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Anybody who reads this thread can see it was you and your pal RM who started throwing the crap.

You keep making my point for me, Howlin.

67 posted on 03/03/2006 12:42:24 PM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC
How much money does the UAE make everytime one of our ships pulls in?

Well gee if they(UAE) were true to their "priciples" they wouldn't let the infidels in.

But they do. Oh That's right they only do it for the money like your other buchannite bogeyman, the joooooosss.

68 posted on 03/03/2006 12:43:55 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

You only just noticed?

They are not the manliest of men.


69 posted on 03/03/2006 12:46:09 PM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; dirtboy
Oh, when he said "Dane," he didn't mean YOU "Dane." It was another "Dane" he was talking about/to.

Yep Dirt does get indignant when caught.

70 posted on 03/03/2006 12:46:17 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Tell the truth, you're Anderson Cooper, aren't you?


71 posted on 03/03/2006 12:46:20 PM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Reagan Man

some of the best advice i've seen yet, dirtboy


72 posted on 03/03/2006 1:11:00 PM PST by Stellar Dendrite (UAE-- Funds HAMAS and CAIR, check my homepage [UPDATED FREQUENTLY])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
Good article. Nullify the deal.

Surely there will be some subtle way to compensate the UAE in another area.

Or, better yet, wave at them. Cheerfully. With some number of your fingers extended, of course.

73 posted on 03/03/2006 1:16:49 PM PST by neutrino (Globalization is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.(173))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla
We may add the entire editorial staff of NR and Duncan Hunter as persona non grata amongst the Hamiltonians.

We may assume the entire editorial staff of NRO and Duncan Hunter, the man they were accusing of homosexuality during the Miers affair, are the newest Heroes of the Whine All The Time Choir. That will change. The only constant about the Choir is their knee jerk bitchiness about EVERYTHING. After all when their only political principal is to be perpetually pissed, they have NO loyalty, intellectual credibility nor moral resiliency.

74 posted on 03/03/2006 1:26:09 PM PST by MNJohnnie ("Good men don't wait for the polls. They stand on principle and fight."-Soul Seeker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
One thing is for sure, you're killing what little credibility you had left on FreeRepublic prior to this DPW/UAE ports issue.

As if you had any......

75 posted on 03/03/2006 1:35:48 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Dig your tagline.


76 posted on 03/03/2006 1:35:58 PM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: E-Mat

"Is there FReep poll for this?"

The second FR poll (available on the FR home page) has a 55-35 split (approx.) in favor of the deal. The first poll's results were the other way around.


77 posted on 03/03/2006 2:02:57 PM PST by indcons (The MSM - Mainstream Slime Merchants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
No kidding.

The deal is unpopular among Republicans — almost 60 percent of whom oppose it, according to polls.

78 posted on 03/03/2006 2:07:07 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie; Stellar Dendrite
We may assume the entire editorial staff of NRO and Duncan Hunter, the man they were accusing of homosexuality during the Miers affair, are the newest Heroes of the Whine All The Time Choir.

By "homosexuality", do you mean like the leader of the Hamiltonian Nat'l Committee, Ken Mehlman? Or the Cheney daughter?
Actually, I've never heard those rumors about Duncan Hunter. Too bad you choose to malign a distinguished veteran and happily married man with two sons.
I see you equate independent thinking with "whining". Standard operating practice amongst the Hamiltonian apparatchiks.

S.D. - I see Debbie Schlussel has made the list.
I'm beginning to realize how conservatives felt in 1976, when Ronald Reagan was voted down in favor of a real Republican, Gerald Ford.

79 posted on 03/03/2006 5:42:18 PM PST by jla (Urge Mike Pence to run for POTUS in '08: http://mikepence.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

You tell 'em, Johnnie. The Titanic is unsinkable.


80 posted on 03/03/2006 8:29:46 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson