Posted on 03/02/2006 11:19:11 AM PST by ExSoldier
m2 was first developed in 1919
The one who tackled the old gal wasn't. California, IIRC. At any rate a place where they aren't used to seeing law abiding old ladies with revolvers. The cops, one of whom was, IIRC, from LA, were there to try to get her to evacuate. She was trying to convince them she'd be ok, "See I have my own gun for protection". The CHIPie freaked and tackled the pluckly old lady. But they weren't there specifically to confiscate her gun, although I believe they did, at least temporarily.
IMHO, the CHIPie should have been horsewhipped and sent back to the land of fruits and nuts.
NRA Sues Mayor Ray Nagin
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Fairfax, VAThe National Rifle Association (NRA ) has filed a motion for contempt against the City of New Orleans, the mayor and the acting chief of police for failure to comply with a temporary restraining order, handed down September 12, 2005, ordering an end to all illegal gun confiscations.
With looters, rapists and other thugs running rampant in New Orleans, Ray Nagin issued an order to disarm all law-abiding citizens, declared Wayne LaPierre, NRA executive vice president. With no law enforcement and 911 available, he left the victims vulnerable by stripping away their only means of defending themselves and their loved ones. Now Ray Nagin thinks hes above the law, and thats just wrong.
Attorneys for NRA have exhausted all efforts to cooperate with the defendants, Mayor Nagin and Chief Riley, who repeatedly ignored the courts permanent restraining order against their illegal gun confiscations.
Ray Nagin is a colossal disappointment, said Chris W. Cox, NRA chief lobbyist. During a federally declared emergency, he abused his power and abandoned the very people he was sworn to protect. He took away the victims freedom and their basic means of self-defense during an ill-fated and perilous time.
The motion also includes an order that all seized firearms must be returned to their rightful owners.
Good! I'm very happy that the assailant was killed and not the victim.
If you take care of the problem yourself that means there is one less criminal on the street which results in less demand for police, judges, and lawyers. It is in the best interest of those three parties to have a decent crime rate in order to keep them employed. I call in conflict of interest.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.