Skip to comments.
Snorer in the court? Ruth Bader Ginsburg snoozes
WorldNetDaily.com ^
| March 1, 2006
Posted on 03/01/2006 10:54:55 PM PST by Tim Long
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
To: Tim Long
Why shouldn't she sleep?
She's already made up her mind.
I'll bet anyone here serious money that she'll vote AGAINST the redistricting.
After all, Tom Delay had a hand it it. Foregone conclusion.
41
posted on
03/02/2006 1:54:19 AM PST
by
Balding_Eagle
(Free Republic, the newspaper I can talk back to!)
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
To: Tim Long; PhilDragoo; potlatch; ntnychik; Liz; dixiechick2000; Victoria Delsoul; Grampa Dave; ...
43
posted on
03/02/2006 2:20:19 AM PST
by
devolve
(<-- (refresh-now-updated-graphix - accts Photobucket & Imagecave)
To: MJY1288
44
posted on
03/02/2006 2:22:38 AM PST
by
Westlander
(Unleash the Neutron Bomb)
To: Tim Long
I wonder if she will feel compelled to refund some of her paycheck back to the Treasury.
45
posted on
03/02/2006 2:42:08 AM PST
by
Mark was here
(How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
To: Tim Long
Some people can sleep anywhere, but me, I can't really sleep soundly till my head hits my desk on Monday morning.
I've heard that Ginsburg has bladder cancer. She may just be holding on, hoping that Hillary will appoint her successor in 2009. It may be really difficult for her to hang in there, so, even though I don't share her views and convictions, I have to admire her guts and determination.
46
posted on
03/02/2006 2:52:23 AM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(NYT Headline: 'Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake But Accurate, Experts Say.')
To: TChad; Howlin; neverdem
My thought as well.
Hypocrisy?
Sure.
Look at what they did VP Quayle for his spelling error. If any conservative did this, the late night jokes/media madness would make Cheney's shooting incident look trivial. (Which it was.)
47
posted on
03/02/2006 2:57:36 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Tim Long
Any judge on the SCOTUS who can't do without an afternoon nap should consider retiring. No wonder the press said it was "a rare afternoon session that lasted two-hours" with these old geezers involved. But then she already knew she'd be voting against the Texas Republicans, so why not nap? The rule ought to be that a judge who does not hear the testimony should not get to vote on the matter they were absent from or snoozed through.
To: A CA Guy
"She did have cancer before and could be weak."
This is when you use a medical leave of absence -- not stay on the job and sleep.
To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"It may be really difficult for her to hang in there, so, even though I don't share her views and convictions, I have to admire her guts and determination."
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>......................
Yep I guess you feel that not having your mental faculties
while deciding cases for SCOTUS is to be admired. . She is betraying all of us with her lack of ability to complete her duties..once again it is all about "her needs", not the function of the court.
Typical of the left.
50
posted on
03/02/2006 5:16:10 AM PST
by
ConsentofGoverned
(if a sucker is born every minute, what are the voters?)
To: Tim Long
I think her cancer is back and they're not yet ready to tell people. The fact that her colleagues allowed her to continue to sleep means that it wasn't merely a doze off.
51
posted on
03/02/2006 5:18:57 AM PST
by
McGavin999
(I suggest the UAE form a Joint Venture Partnership with Halliburton & Wal-Mart)
To: Tim Long
In all seriousness, I think she should have to recuse herself from this case. She obviously missed testimony. Alito was not involved in the abortion protester decision because he was not on the court when testimony was given. If you do not have the physical stamina for the job it is time to go.
If the redistricting case goes against the current map I see a great case for an appeal - if one can appeal a Supreme Court decision?
52
posted on
03/02/2006 5:24:48 AM PST
by
Republican Red
("How good is it? Al-Jazeera gave it 4 1/2 pipe bombs")
To: Tim Long
Where's the pic?
FOX should have it on their homepage.
To: Howlin
Fox News with Britt Hume showed the sketch...and indeed, Bader does have her head on the bench. Wouldn't this get the average J. Doe fired if this happened on their job?
To: Bubbatuck
I believe he was referring to a screen capture of the artist's sketch from Fox News.
55
posted on
03/02/2006 5:45:41 AM PST
by
MortMan
(Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
To: McGavin999
I think her cancer is back and they're not yet ready to tell people. The fact that her colleagues allowed her to continue to sleep means that it wasn't merely a doze off. I wondered how quickly someone would find a way to tie this to a potential retirement. :-)
Obviously, that would be exceptional news (the retirement of course... not the cancer).
I might dismiss it out of hand, but somebody certainly thinks one more judge is going to retire in the next couple years. States (SD/MS) wouldn't be pushing forward with total bans on abortion if they thought the current court would get the case... there are (at best) four votes against Roe today. Given that the cases will take at least two years (possibly longer) to reach the Supreme Court... there must at least be speculation that Ginsburg or Stevens won't make it through Bush's second term.
Replace either one of them with a real conservative, and the court moves solidly to the right for at least a couple decades.
56
posted on
03/02/2006 6:47:59 AM PST
by
IMRight
To: IMRight
I think Stevens is going to retire. If Ginsberg's cancer is flaring up again that could well be two seats. Ginsberg may happen before the elections.
57
posted on
03/02/2006 7:05:22 AM PST
by
McGavin999
(I suggest the UAE form a Joint Venture Partnership with Halliburton & Wal-Mart)
To: McGavin999
I think Stevens is going to retire. If Ginsberg's cancer is flaring up again that could well be two seats. Ginsberg may happen before the elections. The 4 (hopefully) conservatives judges do have a 15-year youth advantage over the 4 liberal justices. As long as we can keep the white house, it is only a matter of time. I really don't think any of them will retire. If one did, that would send shockwaves to the liberals. They would be in panic mode like we have never witnessed before in history.
To: Tim Long
There's really no reason for her to stay awake. Since she rarely writes any opinions, she only has to make a call to the ACLU near the end of each case so she will know which way to vote.
59
posted on
03/02/2006 7:14:42 AM PST
by
Hoodat
( Silly Dems, AYBABTU.)
To: Tim Long
60
posted on
03/02/2006 7:15:41 AM PST
by
Keli Kilohana
(Editor, ZARR CHASM CHRONICAL [sic], Sore, WV)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-156 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson