Skip to comments.
Freeper Investigation Project: Freeper Personality Types Update
First Results ^
| March 2, 2006
| Alamo-Girl and Nita Nupress
Posted on 03/01/2006 10:19:16 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
Below are the expanded results of the research project! Occupations have been listed in each code without reference to Freeper handles. Thank you all so very much for participating in this project! If you'd like to be listed in the next update, please take the test and let us know your code and scores:
Jung Personality Test Type Codes
Also, please note your occupation (along with your code) - and if you don't want others to know your occupation, please send either Nita Nupress or me a Freep mail with the information.
Previous Threads:
Orginal ThreadFirst Results Thread
For your information:
Percent of Population InformationCompatibility Charts
Soulmates
TOPICS: Free Republic; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: jungpersonalitytest; mmpi; personality; psychology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-193 next last
To: GopherIt
Thank you for the encouragements! Please do have your children take this test, I'll include their results in the table if you wish. The TypeLogic link has the code for many famous people, though I don't recall Hillary's off hand.
To: Alamo-Girl
Would you try to overcome your introverted personality and actually share what you think of my observation?
I am of the opinion that our personalities would be quite compatible because they are very similar, with me simply being more extroverted than you.
I did not check to see your duality type.
To: Billthedrill
Lotsa INTJ's there - we're 2-6% of the population according to your links. Verrrry interesting. BTT. Based on the expertise of of an ENFJ:
1. INTJ occupation list is far and away the longest.
2. Some of the personality types would be in stark contrast to those of most FReepers.
3. INTJs have no social life, so they don't have anything better to do than take this test. ;-)
4. INTJs overanalyze everything.
To: connectthedots
LOLOL! Actually the introvert/extrovert here has to do with "recharging" rather than the usual meaning.
I have no bias in any direction concerning theories of compatibility or finding one's soulmate. For me (INFJ BTW) - marriage is accomplished by God and not man so self-will is a moot point per se.
To: Alamo-Girl
Ping for later testing...
85
posted on
03/02/2006 12:04:13 AM PST
by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: Alamo-Girl
INTJ
Introverted-56
Intuitive-25
Thinking-62
Judging-1
Sinecure ;o)
To: Alamo-Girl; GopherIt
I saw Hillary's somewhere once. I think it was bITcH.
To: Alamo-Girl
thanks for all your work Alamo-Girl! very interesting! :)
88
posted on
03/02/2006 12:06:11 AM PST
by
ferri
(Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!)
To: Alamo-Girl
To: Alamo-Girl
Woo-hoo! I'm not listed!
This is a ch__ch. What's missing?
90
posted on
03/02/2006 12:09:47 AM PST
by
rdb3
(What it is is what it was.)
To: Alamo-Girl
I truely think I'm all the categories at different times and moments and with different personalitys to interact with..
Maybe we all are.. What the test misses is "cusps".. like in astrology.. People are so darn complicated.. For sure I'm all twelve of the astrological signs.. I wonder.... could this test display what type of a second reality a person is into?... Now thats a thought...
91
posted on
03/02/2006 12:14:12 AM PST
by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
To: rdb3
Oops, you are listed but she misspelled your screen name. You're number 14.
Now, can you believe I read and then re-read the whole list of INTJ's? I did because your name was one of those I saw when I saw who else was in the same category I was in.
(Maybe I need to get a life or something!)
92
posted on
03/02/2006 12:15:30 AM PST
by
Sally'sConcerns
(Native Texan now in SW Ok.)
To: Sally'sConcerns; rdb3
Now, can you believe I read and then re-read the whole list of INTJ's? I did because your name was one of those I saw when I saw who else was in the same category I was in. (Maybe I need to get a life or something!)
This is your life. ;-)
To: connectthedots
This is your life. ;-) whimper...
94
posted on
03/02/2006 12:22:16 AM PST
by
Sally'sConcerns
(Native Texan now in SW Ok.)
To: Alamo-Girl
Wowser, A_G! This has blossomed into quite a project!
ENTJ Here...
I work part time as a Mechanic (mainly trucks), Light Transport Truck Driver, and as a Webmaster. How's that for diversity?
95
posted on
03/02/2006 12:24:20 AM PST
by
AZ_Cowboy
("There they go again...")
To: Sally'sConcerns
Oops, you are listed but she misspelled your screen name. You're number 14.Really? There is a FReeper with the name of "r9etb".
Me being a "Mastermind?" LAWD have mercy! ;-)
This is a ch__ch. What's missing?
96
posted on
03/02/2006 12:25:31 AM PST
by
rdb3
(What it is is what it was.)
To: rdb3
You're right! I forgot about r9etb being a FReeper. I'll go sit in the corner now. It's probably the safest place for me to be this late at night anyway. :^}
97
posted on
03/02/2006 12:28:50 AM PST
by
Sally'sConcerns
(Native Texan now in SW Ok.)
To: Sally'sConcerns
This is your life. ;-) whimper... Aristotle would've killed for this opportunity!
To: Alamo-Girl
INTJ- Lab scientist, medical technologist.
99
posted on
03/02/2006 3:24:36 AM PST
by
momincombatboots
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: Alamo-Girl
Durn! Forgot my numbers INTJ 67,25,25,67
100
posted on
03/02/2006 3:26:23 AM PST
by
momincombatboots
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-193 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson