Posted on 03/01/2006 4:21:10 PM PST by KayEyeDoubleDee
What do phrases like "control of ports" really mean? Consider this article which purports that in New Orleans 2000 feet out of 440 miles of port frontage would be owned by DPW.
I also heard Rush say the other day that something like 10 out of 3000 facilities (docks? slips?) would be under the control of DBP.
Similiarly, this article seems to indicate that the entire Port of Miami will not be sold, but rather "part of one of the operators at the port"
I'm sorry, but I don't.
They are purchasing the contracts that P&O have on a FEW terminals...........shipping terminals. No PORTS; NO SECURITY.
Out of about 300 terminals, I think they are going to have less than 10.
You've got it mostly right except for the owned part. DPW wouldn't own the 2000 feet. Included in the purchase are leases which lease the facilies. DPW will own the leases but they won't own the actual frontage.
Just a minor quibble. :^)
Sally, this would be a good place for you to post your Houston information.
Hmmmph! facilies = facilities~
Here ya go!
HOUSTON, Feb. 23, 2006 -- The recent announcement of plans by the Dubai Ports World (DP World) to purchase P&O Ports (P&O) will not have an impact on any of the facilities or operations of the Port of Houston Authority (PHA).
The PHA is a political subdivision chartered by the state of Texas. It owns and either operates or leases 12 public facilities. The PHA does not own or operate private facilities.
Specifically in Houston, P&O leases space at the PHA's Barbours Cut Container Terminal for container and chassis repair and container storage. At the PHA's Turning Basin Terminal, P&O maintains a freight handling assignment and is licensed to provide stevedore services. P&O does not own or operate public (PHA) facilities.
P&O, a private company headquartered in London, is involved in worldwide container terminal operations and stevedore services for the maritime industry.
The Port of Houston comprises more than 150 public (PHA) and private terminals along the 53-mile Houston Ship Channel. The port's private terminals include several U.S.-based, foreign-based and multi-national corporations. Approximately 85% of cargo that moves through Houston's port is handled at private facilities. A large portion of the port's private facilities are engaged in production, refining and transportation operations related to the global oil, gas and chemical industries.
PORT SECURITY
All port facilities in the U.S. that are engaged in commercial activities across interstate lines or international borders -- whether public or private, domestic or foreign -- are subject to state and federal security statutes as well as the rules and regulations of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies.
The federal government takes the lead in protecting America's ports. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, primarily through the activities of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and the U.S. Coast Guard, runs many programs to secure U.S. ports. The U.S. Coast Guard is responsible for maritime security and reviewing and approving security plans for vessels, port facilities and port areas which are required by the MTSA. Customs and Border Protection is responsible for cargo security, and screens and inspects cargo entering the U.S. through every U.S. port.
Other cargo security programs include:
-- Container Security Initiative (inspection of U.S. import cargo
by CBP prior to leaving the outbound foreign port)
-- Use of radiation detection equipment to screen for weapons of
mass destruction
-- Use of other non-intrusive inspection devices
-- Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT), which
encourages maritime stakeholders to verify their security
measures.
The Port Security Grant program and the pending implementation of the Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) are also important parts of America's port security portfolio to provide layered security.
While the federal government takes the lead on waterside and cargo security, overall security is a shared responsibility with port authorities, facility and vessel operators, and state and local law enforcement agencies providing additional security. The Maritime Transportation Security Act also establishes local security committees to evaluate and make improvements in each port.
In general, port infrastructure throughout the U.S. and around the world consists of diverse collections of docks, warehouses, and terminals. For the past two decades, it has been a common maritime industry practice for private port facilities in some countries to be operated by organizations that are based in other countries. This is widely regarded as the nature of trade and commerce in today's global economy.
For more information, please visit www.portofhouston.com .
The Port of Houston Authority logo can be found at: http://media.primezone.com/prs/single/?pkgid=720
CONTACTS: Port of Houston Authority
Argentina M. James, Director of Public Affairs
Office: (713) 670-2568 Cell: (713) 306-6822
ajames@poha.com
Felicia Griffin, Communications Manager
Office: (713) 670-2644 Cell: (713) 594-5620
fgriffin@poha.com
I think you apply the information in the article to what DP *would* operate in each of these ports, namely container traffic. If you look again at the article, I think you'll see what I mean.
That's it, in a nutshell. :-)
The "Arabs" ( since when is DPW owned by every single ARAB? )will NOT be in control of our ports.
DPW bought P&O, which is an English firm, which LEASES; NOT OWNS a few TERMINALS, which are something akin to a warehouse, in several different ports in America.
And it is one, ONLY ONE company, P&O, which is being bought; NOT, as you state, "companies"!
You are completely misrepresenting the facts.
Will the terminals still have a P&O logo?
NO!
Are you claiming that P&O has the trademark and/or a patent on port terminals that they use?
If so, then you are utterly and completely wrong!
bttt
They are not controlling the ports. They are controlling operations at terminals within the ports.
This is a huge difference.
Thanks. This confirms what I thought.
That's a lot of concrete to pour!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.