Posted on 03/01/2006 12:01:59 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Can I ask a naieve question. What is Free Republic. I see it is not a blog. What do we call it other then home?
Hmmmm.... Nice try, but "mow 'em down like terrorists" is just a bit harsh. You really need to learn to pick your battles; and for those you do pick, you really need to think up more convincing arguments.
thanks
Do you have a verifiable source for this fantastic claim?
One has to right and one has to be wrong...right?
It's because they don't list same sex abuse unless the perp identifies as homosexual which flies in the face of the definition of homosexual. i.e. same-sex attraction
As per usual for the homosexual agenda defenders, you're here to defend the "honor" of your friends who practice perversion. Your kind are a broken record around here.
Homosexuality is defined by the behavior. If they practice homosexual behavior they are homosexual regardless of their 'orientation'. If they do not practice homosexual behavior they are not homosexual regardless of their 'orientation'
This is why I seldom use the term homosexual to describe a person. There is no such thing as a homosexual person. There are people who suffer from the mental disease known as homosexuality but these people are simply mentally ill heterosexuals.
That fact remains that around or upwards of 35% of child molestation is same sex.
Covered in Leviticus 18 and 21. Of course being Christians we'd rather see them saved and changed but that still doesn't stop us from feeling badly about them sometimes.
Alright! Which one of you spilled the beans to the press!
They are talking about us - PING
;-)
Are you going to post those made up "FBI statistics"? A few posters have asked you for sources and you are conveniently ignoring their queries.
You're famous.....
Check this out!
Actually I suggest you learn to mind your own business if you cannot handle the facts. Don't remember anyone appointing you to any position of judgment or authority over Free Republic. If you object to the rhetoric sent your way, don't dish it out.
Then if you do choose to object, have the bare minimum of intellectual honesty to completely and factually quote it, not lie by omission by misquoting and misrepresenting the statements. A lie is still a lie even when dressed up in self righteous, holier then thou, pompous posturing.
This thread contains links to the offending thread, as well as several postings of the entire comment.
Call us back when you've done your homework.
I know it's not me... There are no typos in it!
Well, technically... uh... how... never mind.
It is a news forum. At least when I joined that was the name that everyone called it. A blog is much different, being a sort of chronological journal. I mean nothing negative toward FR, but there is a big difference. As Wikipedia says:
"An internet forum is not a blog (technically speaking), but a blog can function as an internet forum. Internet forums typically allow any user to post (into the discussion). Blogs typically limit posting to the blogger or to the blogger and approved others."
I love the story of Mad Mo on your FReeper home page. Was laughing out loud as I read certin passages. Nice work!!
I don't know of any of the threads I frequent that would allow talk like that. I think we would zot them as a troll.
I don't have the time to go through past posting looking for those type of comments.
I know full well I have read plenty of "I wish fags would just die and go away" and "fags will burn in hell" and the like. Some of it sounds like that maniac minister who is disrupting funerals with his "God hates fags" blather.
If you really have not seen anything like that on FR - then you haven't looked very hard.
Hmmmm.... This from a man who by his own admission does not even know the facts of the post in question.
Don't remember anyone appointing you to any position of judgment or authority over Free Republic.
Oh, I wouldn't want to intrude on your territory ... please, please forgive my transgression! LOL!
Then if you do choose to object, have the bare minimum of intellectual honesty to completely and factually quote it, not lie by omission by misquoting and misrepresenting the statements.
And yet again, I must remind you that you admit to not having seen the post in question.... What were you saying about intellectual honesty?
self righteous, holier then thou, pompous posturing.
Indeed....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.