Ann Coulter: Dishonest, dumb, or what? [Mickey Kaus defends Coulter Against Bob Wright)

bloggingheads.tv ^ | 2/27/06 | Mickey Kaus / Bob Wright

[BCrago66]

This is a "vlog," i.e., when you click the link, you'll get a Windows Media or RealVideo dialog between Bob Wright and Mickey Kaus, caused by Mr. Wright freakout over being accused by Ann Coulter of having "affection for terrorists."

I found Wright's meltdown pretty funny. And now I must go to work. Enjoy.

[cll]

Ann Coulter, Dishonest, Dumb?!....Jihaaaaad!

[7thson]

I watched this. The guy Kaus, I couldn't get what he was trying to say half the time because Wright kept interupting. The guy Wright seemed to feel that no one should infer anything from his pieces but he can infer whatever he wants. He also seems to protest too much as if he was caught with his hand in the jar.

[goldstategop]

LOL! Liberals get freaked out by Ann Coulter. Last I heard, Ted Rall b*tched - still waiting for word on his threatened lawsuit against the conservative diva.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

[Jaxter]

[moonman]

That was the longest video of nothing I ever wasted time on.

[muawiyah]

Not everything everybody says is meaningful.

Wake me up Scottie!

[lentulusgracchus]

Thanks for the AC post. The vacuum is appeased!!

[dropzone]

This Wright guy is a hyper-wuss.

[Stepan12]

LOL! Liberals get freaked out by Ann Coulter. Last I heard, Ted Rall b*tched - still waiting for word on his threatened lawsuit against the conservative diva.

[ConservaTexan]

"Dishonest, dumb, or what?"-Bob Wright

"The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard."-Stephen Wright

[UB355]

Yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnn .........

[Donald Rumsfeld Fan]

Great video. She's really getting to the liberals.

Ann says "this chicken has an affection for terrorists..."

Bob Wright..."Ann...why are you so mean?"

[an amused spectator]

So I read Booby Wright's original article, and I was wondering if he is stupid, or dishonest? Which one is it?

I'm voting for the dishonest option. His whole article is a disengenuous exercise in Islam apologia. While discussing the Muslim cartoon rage, he totally left out the salient point that Islamofascist agitators created the political equivalent of the The Protocols of The Elders of Zion to throw jellied gasoline on a controversy that THEY cooked up.

Then Booby had the nerve to put Islamofascist anti-Semitic cartoons AND the phony Mohammed cartoons in the same basket, ignoring the fact that the authors of the hateful cartoons live under the same Mid-east rock.

Wright is a facile Sophist, skilled in both print and verbally.

But he's still a Sophist.

[an amused spectator]

I must also point out that fag-hag Arianna is an expert at crack. ;-)

[an amused spectator]

That was the longest video of nothing I ever wasted time on.

Actually, you learned that Wright is a Sophist skilled in both print and oral argument. If you didn't read his article, it's right here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/17/opinion/17Wright.html?ei=5090&en=69beccf047800aa8&ex=1297832400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print

[EveningStar]

Did you see this? This Bob Wright character is really flaming! LOL!

[rcocean]

This is why I love Coulter. The liberals can dish it out, but they cant take it.

One Moment Wright is babbling on about how "unfair" Coulter is. And she's bad for reasoned discourse.

Then in the next breath, he's calling her a Nazi, ugly, too skinny, McCarthyite, etc.