To: Aussie Dasher
it's easy to be objective when YOU'RE NOT THE ONE CARRYING THE CHILD IN YOUR BODY.
126 posted on
02/28/2006 7:05:45 PM PST by
Hildy
(The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
To: Hildy
What has the CHILD done to deserve being dismembered?
133 posted on
02/28/2006 7:07:00 PM PST by
Aussie Dasher
(The Great Ronald Reagan & John Paul II - Heaven's Dream Team!)
To: Hildy; Aussie Dasher
If your argument is down to "you can't possibly understand (abortion) because you're a man", well... FReepers are better debaters than that, don't you agree?
148 posted on
02/28/2006 7:08:58 PM PST by
cgk
(I don't see myself as a conservative. I see myself as a religious, right-wing, wacko extremist.)
To: Hildy
Tough call, but I think I am going to have to side with you and Bush on this one (for the most part). I cannot accept forcing a raped woman to carry a pregnancy to term. If the abortion takes place, the rapist should be charged with not only rape, but murder of the child. Would make things interesting.
274 posted on
02/28/2006 7:28:03 PM PST by
M203M4
To: Hildy
"it's easy to be objective when YOU'RE NOT THE ONE CARRYING THE CHILD IN YOUR BODY."
I agree with you Hildy. As a Christian, I know Christ would say that killing the child resulting from rape is wrong, but I also know him well enough to say that he would understand the horrible torment of the woman and forgive her for doing so.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson