Posted on 02/28/2006 6:31:02 AM PST by Geronimo
Edited on 02/28/2006 10:44:02 AM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX FEB 28, 2006 09:00:01 ET XXXXX
BUSH CHEERS DECLINE OF MAINSTREAM MEDIA, RISE OF ALTERNATIVE PRESS
**Exclusive**
ROVE SLAMS DAN RATHER: NOT A 'SERIOUS' REPORTER
President Bush, for the first time, is hailing the rise of the alternative media and the decline of the mainstream media, which he now says conspired to harm him with forged documents.
I find it interesting that the old way of gathering the news is slowly but surely losing market share, Bush said in an exclusive interview for the new book STRATEGERY. Its interesting to watch these media conglomerates try to deal with the realities of a new kind of world.
[STRATEGERY was ranked #5 on AMAZON.COM's sales chart early Tuesday morning.]
For example, journalist Dan Rather left the anchor chair at CBS News after Internet reporters revealed he had used forged documents to criticize Bushs military record in September 2004. The forgeries, which Bush now calls a conspiracy, ended up helping his reelection campaign, he acknowledged in the Oval Office interview.
It looks like somebody conspired to float false documents, the president tells author Bill Sammon. And I was amazed about it. I just couldnt believe that would be happening [and] then it would become the basis of a fairly substantial series of news stories.
He added: Then there was a backlash to it. I mean, a lot of people were angry that this could have happened. A lot of Americans are fair people and they viewed this as patently unfair. So in a funny way, I guess it inured to our benefit, when it was all said and done.
The episode, known as Memogate, inoculated Bush against further scrutiny of his National Guard record for the duration of the presidential campaign.
It also, frankly, gave us an opportunity, frequently, when things came out in the media that we didnt believe or didnt like, to say, Its another CBS story, said Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman, who was the presidents campaign manager. I mean, it gave us a serious response to bad news.
Although Memogate was initially expected to harm the president, it ended up backfiring spectacularly on the press.
The guy that it hurt most was Dan Rather and the executives at CBS, White House strategist Karl Rove said in an interview for STRATEGERY. It further disgraced a network which is third in ratings and, if you look at the demographics of their consumers, its like 70 percent Democrat.
Rove said Rathers eagerness to broadcast obviously forged documents proves he is no serious reporter. As for Rathers insistence, to this day, that the documents are real, Rove said: Thats really bias.
Memogate has helped accelerate the decline of the mainstream media, generally defined as CBS, NBC, ABC, The New York Times and other establishment news outlets.
I think whats healthy is that theres no monopoly on the news, Bush said. Theres competition. Theres competition for the attention of, you know, 290 million people, or whatever it is.
And the amazing thing about this world we live in is that theres a kind of free-flowing, kind of bulletin board of ideas and thoughts out there in the ether space, sometimes landing on somebodys desk and sometimes not, but always available. Its a very interesting period.
Having long been pilloried by the mainstream media, Bush now finds the rise of the alternative media nothing less than revolutionary.
Its the beginning of the twenty-first century; it also happens to be the beginning ofor near the beginningof a revolution in newsgathering and dissemination, he said. Not in newsmakingthat tends to be pretty consistent.
Rove considers Memogate a watershed in the rise of the alternative media.
The whole incident in the fall of 2004 showed really the power of the 'blogosphere', he said in his West Wing office.
Because in essence you had now, an army of self-appointed experts looking over the shoulder of the mainstream media and bringing to bear enormously sophisticated skills, he added.
Still, Rove cautioned that the Internets political potential has a darker side.
There is so much ugliness and viciousness and fundamental untruths that the blogosphere transmits, he lamented. It also is a vehicle for ugly rumors, for scurrilous personal attacks, an avenue for the creation of urban legends which are deeply corrosive of the political system and of peoples faith in it.
Rove said Rather and his producer, Mary Mapes, were gunning for the president and trying to help his challenger, Sen. John Kerry, by broadcasting the forged documents in the heat of the presidential campaign.
From her body language and his body language, their enthusiasm for this story was in large measure fed by the belief that they were playing a constructive and perhaps determinative role in the presidential campaign, Rove said of Mapes and Rather.
They made a decision in this instance I think quite prematurely and quite unfairly to pursue a story that attacked the president, he added. And I thought it was, to me, one of the most incredible examples of how fundamentally unfair it was.
Rove expressed astonishment that CBS ignored the warnings of document experts hired by the network to authenticate the National Guard memos.
It goes back to the failure of the mainstream media, in this instance, to honor their own experts, he said.
Rove is not the only senior Bush adviser who considers the mainstream media biased against the conservative president. White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card was outraged that the TV networks refused to declare Bush the winner on Election Night, even after all the votes were counted in the pivotal state Ohio and it became obvious Kerry could not win.
Some of the talking heads, Card said, were rooting for a crisis in Ohio. It wasnt just that they were afraid to admit we had won.
Card became particularly incensed when Bushs Ohio lead reached 120,000 votes, which was mathematically insurmountable.
Nobody wanted to call it so that we had won, he said. It was like, cmon, are they just afraid to say it?
Developing...
The New Yorker, Atlantic, Harper's...
Where they always go. The internet.
At least a lurker, and I'm sure Rove is here everyday...
22 But the word of the true proverb has happened to them: The dog turning to his own vomit; and, The washed sow to wallowing in the mire.
LOL! Wouldn't that be a kick in the pants?
Now I 'gotta buy it!
I do too. In fact, I would cheer louder if main stream media organizations would go completely broke.
They can't do more "hit pieces". They are already doing "hit pieces" as fast as their presses can print.
I gotta get this book, I've loved all the excerpts. One of the bisggest stories over the last couple of years has been the absoluyte fall of the MSM. Their influence and reliability and their blatant bias has caused the rise of alternative sources like the internet, Fox News, & Talk Radio.
Nature abhors a vacuum.
Hey, upper right hand corner, the one with the tiny head - is that Buchanan?
This week in Orlando Florida is the big media advertising buyers convention...it should be interesting to see the numbers....afterall I think most of the circulation numbers the media uses are false...here in Denver the two papers give out free ones to up their numbers..and hence higher ad costs
If all else fails, the blogs can get the news the way it is done now, make it up. :-)
If there is a market for print media there will be print media. The problem with it is with the internet by the time you get your paper in the morning you have already read nearly everything in it. However, several new magazines appear each year and some stick around.
But many of the articles posted here come from large daily newspapers. By and large, bloggers don't go out and do reporting. The news stories have to come from somewhere initially, and this is something that I've wondered about many times while watching the decline of traditional news media.
I'm not saying I'll miss the liberal bias, and I won't miss editors attempting to set their own agendas. But I do wonder what will replace the Chicago Tribune or the Washington Post or the New York Times, for that matter.
Someone is going to have to put the news on the internet.
All these changes have devastated the MSM; people can now time shift their TV programming, watch movies at home only 4-5 months after theatrical release, and get information that the MSM can't cover or ignore for political reasons. The really scary part for newspapers is that the likes of eBay and Craigslist are starting to devestate classified ads, one of the few remaining moneymakers for the newspapers.
"GWB may be a freeper. LOL"
Thats not as far fetched as you may think.
I'm sure that the RNC reads FR often.
Do any of you subscribe to newspapers? If so, is it a community (small daily or weekly in your hometown) or is it a major daily newspaper?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.