[BeHoldAPaleHorse]

"Doesn't matter who copied it down. Oral history is just as good and authoratative as eyewitness, sorry Charlie"

Sorry, there is no independent evidence that this is unedited eyewitness testimony. It's hearsay. If you attempted to enter in a similar document as "testimony" in a court of law, it would not be classed as such. It's hearsay.

[zeeba neighba]

Well it has entered its court of law and been accepted, so it's moot anyway. Still, no evolutionist to date can provide an intelligent rebuttal to years of scholarship on the matter, and so should refrain from making such remarks. Remember,We now say "frequently-repeated error," sometimes called (after the poster has received numerous corrections) a "compulsively repeated error" instead of the harsher term. Everyone be nice.

[Elsie]

It's hearsay. If you attempted to enter in a similar document as "testimony" in a court of law, it would not be classed as such. It's hearsay.

Nope... that is called a deposition.