To: zeeba neighba
"Doesn't matter who copied it down. Oral history is just as good and authoratative as eyewitness, sorry Charlie"
Sorry, there is no independent evidence that this is unedited eyewitness testimony. It's hearsay. If you attempted to enter in a similar document as "testimony" in a court of law, it would not be classed as such. It's hearsay.
375 posted on
02/28/2006 12:50:24 PM PST by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Well it has entered its court of law and been accepted, so it's moot anyway. Still, no evolutionist to date can provide an intelligent rebuttal to years of scholarship on the matter, and so should refrain from making such remarks. Remember,We now say "frequently-repeated error," sometimes called (after the poster has received numerous corrections) a "compulsively repeated error" instead of the harsher term. Everyone be nice.
376 posted on
02/28/2006 12:54:25 PM PST by
zeeba neighba
(What I'm reading now: The Word of the Lord)
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
It's hearsay. If you attempted to enter in a similar document as "testimony" in a court of law, it would not be classed as such. It's hearsay. Nope... that is called a deposition.
448 posted on
02/28/2006 1:57:52 PM PST by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson