To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Well it has entered its court of law and been accepted, so it's moot anyway. Still, no evolutionist to date can provide an intelligent rebuttal to years of scholarship on the matter, and so should refrain from making such remarks. Remember,We now say "frequently-repeated error," sometimes called (after the poster has received numerous corrections) a "compulsively repeated error" instead of the harsher term. Everyone be nice.
376 posted on
02/28/2006 12:54:25 PM PST by
zeeba neighba
(What I'm reading now: The Word of the Lord)
To: zeeba neighba
"Well it has entered its court of law and been accepted, so it's moot anyway."
Please provide the case citation where it was accepted as testimony in a court of law.
377 posted on
02/28/2006 12:57:16 PM PST by
BeHoldAPaleHorse
(Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson