[ahayes]

Pschaw, that's nothing. It's still a [insert species here]. Unless you can show a lizard evolving into a mammal right before my eyes, it means nothing.

*removes anti-evolutionist hat* Just getting the typical objections out of the way.

[ClearCase_guy]

"It's still a ..."

Please point me to the single best instance in that long comment above, where you see an animal species generate a different animal species. I don't see a single one. In every case, the species is still what it started out to be, but a scientist "sees a possibility".

Section 5.1.2 is where I would expect the meat to be and it's pitifully short and devoid of content. Later in the document are quite a few "examples" which are not actual examples of anything.

I find it quite unconvincing.

[Dimensio]

Pschaw, that's nothing. It's still a [insert species here].

You mean "It's still a [insert arbitrary declaration of 'kind' here]". I have observed on more than one occasion a creationist literally redefining the meaning of "species" as a means of denying observed speciation events.