To: ahayes
Pschaw, that's nothing. It's still a [insert species here].
You mean "It's still a [insert arbitrary declaration of 'kind' here]". I have observed on more than one occasion a creationist literally redefining the meaning of "species" as a means of denying observed speciation events.
152 posted on
02/28/2006 9:34:41 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Dimensio; ahayes
It's still a [insert arbitrary declaration of 'kind' here]". I have a 1970s-era textbook on vertebrate morphology. In the introductory chapter, "kind" is used synonymously with "taxon".
Seems to be the CRIDer usage as well.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson