[Diamond]

If your faith requires actual geological evidence for a universal flood, your faith is in deep trouble. Christian geologists gave up on this around 1830.

Correction; SOME Christian geologists gave up on the idea around 1830. I am not a geologist, but I think there is a lot of physical evidence for a global flood. I simply interpret the physical evidence differently than you do.

Cordially,

[js1138]

And if your private interpretation is correct you will no doubt be worthy of a Nobel Prize. You and Amish Dude should get together an do the math.

[Elsie]

I simply interpret the physical evidence differently than you do.

How DARE you!!!

--EvoDude

[Junior]

I simply interpret the physical evidence differently than you do.

Nope. As has been pointed out before, you would have to interpret the evidence IN ISOLATION to come to the conclusion there was a universal flood. The evidence TAKEN IN TOTAL converges on there never having been a worldwide flood.

[ml1954]

I simply interpret the physical evidence differently than you do.

Rejection is not really interpretation. There's a difference between 'interpret' and 'reject'. You are apparently confusing acceptance of evidence with interpretation.