Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond
I simply interpret the physical evidence differently than you do.

Nope. As has been pointed out before, you would have to interpret the evidence IN ISOLATION to come to the conclusion there was a universal flood. The evidence TAKEN IN TOTAL converges on there never having been a worldwide flood.

1,248 posted on 03/02/2006 12:53:18 PM PST by Junior (Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1214 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
As has been pointed out before, you would have to interpret the evidence IN ISOLATION to come to the conclusion there was a universal flood.

Eighty percent of the earth's crust is sedimentary rock. 95 percent of all fossils are marine invertrebrates, with no clear evidence of any evolutionary precursors in the fossil record. I don't know how to interpret that 95% in an isolated manner.

Cordially,

1,254 posted on 03/02/2006 1:04:13 PM PST by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1248 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson