Posted on 02/27/2006 1:04:17 PM PST by Stoat
|
||||||||
|
Thanks...I might have some shipped to family in Montreal.
You're welcome...what a great gift idea!
Do you like Laphroaig?
Part of the Whiskey would vaporize as it went down the esophagus. If you, in turn, breathed in the vapors to the lungs, it might cause a spasm of the lungs.
My SweetiePalm also says that it would be absorbed into the bloodstream faster in the stomach.
'La bonne cuisine est la base du véritable bonheur.' - Auguste Escoffier
(Good food is the foundation of genuine happiness.)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Local restaurant stocks it for us...lots of return business.
Hey for all you Scotch Whisky afficionados. I’m currently “in the sandbox” and have been sober for 4 months now (oh the hugh manatee). Right before I left I found out by accident that I actually like some whiskies. I drank some Canadian Club Classic 12yr and realized that not every whisky reminds me of the very bad experience with a fifth of Jack Daniels when I was 17.
What do you guys think someone who doesn’t know anything about Scotch should try first? I’ve been reading a little bit online and I was thinking of Highland Park 12yr or just buying Famous Grouse since it’s cheap. I figure if I don’t like it i can always keep it on hand for my Father in law or my Wife’s Grandfather. I’ve always been mostly a microbrew beer guy but I do like my gin and tonics.
Thoughts?
By the way: did you see this story recently?
Bottle of scotch sells for $54,000 at 1st NY liquor auction since Prohibition
A good starting Scotch Whisky is a triple filtered lowland singlemalt:
Whisky Magazine Tasting Notes
Nose - Scenty. Definite linseed. Lemon grass. Vanilla.
Palate Light, soft, oily, mashmallow-like. Good flavour development. From lemony to cedary.
Finish - Rounded. Soothing, long.
Comment - At 10 years, Auchentoshan makes an expressive, eloquent claim to being the classic Lowlander.As tasted by Michael Jackson rated at 83
Begorrah !...... ceoil agus craic !!
Tell Molly !
We can cut this down with everclear for safety sake !
I believe that Michael Jackson's book as kindly mentioned by FReeper XeniaSt at post #187 in this thread is usually regarded as the "Bible" of Single Malt guides. Here's a link to a search results page for all of the books he's written including the Single Malt guide:
Amazon.com Michael Jackson Books
Hint: Some bars will have a copy of Mr. Jackson's book (or others) behind the counter and are delighted to loan it to customers to read at their table....it will help them sell more, after all :-)
A friendly warning....there's a huge variation of tastes available for Scotch as I'm sure you know, and it's helpful to be aware of regional differences....here's a fun excerpt from a page at the Bruichladdich site which reprints an article from The Spectator:
Of course, you may wonder why you would want Islay malts at all, since the usual complaint is that they taste as if they belong in a doctors surgery. Its really a matter of trying the lot. Islay as a whisky region has terrific variety eight distilleries and they can be as light as a summer daisy or big, fat, oily beasts standing stolidly in the rain. The hefty Ardbeg has its loyal fans, as does Bowmore. Personally, Im biased against the two most famous Islay malts Laphroaig and Lagavulin because their visitor centres are into all that spirit o the isles pixie heritage twaddle that the industry likes to wrap itself in.
(edit)
For some reason, all island whiskies pack lashings of character. Orkney has its delicious Scapa and Highland Park, Skye its Talisker, Mull its Tobermory, Jura its Isle of Jura; but with Islay youre spoilt for choice. At Bruichladdich they will be reviving two redundant Islay whiskies, Port Charlotte and Octomore. With the latter, the plan is to make the peatiest whisky ever distilled. For example, Bruichladdich has a phenol content (the measure of peat influence at the time of malting) ot about three to five parts per million. With Octomore they are going for no fewer than 60 parts. Itll be so peaty that youll be bedding out plants in it.
Crystal Clear
That's the stuff I chugged down one long-ago Saturday night. My 'friend' handed me the bottle and said, "Bet ya can't drink this!" I could not breathe after the last swallow!
Luckily I'd eaten three hits of blotter acid about an hour beforehand, otherwise I might have passed out...
I’ve had 180 proof, 12-year old kosher slivovitz from Poland. The tast evaporates on the tongue, before exploding in the gut. The answer is to simply cut w/ water.
Oh.
My first Single Malt was The Balvenie’s DoubleWood. It was pretty good.
Heard of it. I don't believe I've ever had it. However, I've imbibed more than my necessary share of "Kirsch".
All of my friends thought I was stupid for drinking it (none of whom ever drank anyting more stout than whiskey or whisky). Let me assure you that I got real stupid drinking that 105 proof liquor distilled from cherry pits. There's flavor there alright: its got to be an acquired taste (or one inherent in the genes). My excuse is that I seen my Dad doing it.
I rememger something a bit more stout than that from way back (and when I was a youngster), something distilled from fermented plum pits.
I fail to disrespect all of that, except for gross irresponsibility that those are prone while under the influence, but the overwhelming question distills down to: why do you need that (or any other sort of mood altering substance)?
What's wrong with feeling the way that you do?
This thread seems to be imbued with anecdotes of consuming to grimace proportions, and my question remains: why consume any mind altering substance for any reason?
What's it take to have a good time with slivotiz? If one is having a good time, is slivovitz even necessary? And if slivovitz can make the good time even better, then how is that?
How's it that a bad time needs to be experienced with slivovitz? What's wrong with going through a bad time without slivovitz?
FYI to ALL: I'm not singling slivovitz out in particular.
I believe the question is germane to our times, and relevant to those who are for and against.
Given what I know 'bout consumption: that philosophical construct is not directed to those against, nor sitting on the fence, but those who are entirely for.
I think a fitting end to this thread would be about a thousand posts of people carrying signs "those for 'against'" and "those agsinst 'for'" bashing each other over the head with their signs.
Certainly I must be in some different "world of slivovitz" right now to even come up with such idea, concept, or whatever.
AFAIC, the predication of "manliness" or "stoutness", or "maxculine", or whatever, is stupid if its essential premise is predicated upon how many ounces at one time of pure EtOH one has consumed in one sitting. That may be just me, but I doubt it...
Laphraoig! Seaweed and iodine! It’s great after being out in the cold/rain all day, sitting around the fire. Aargh.
have you come down yet?
Pretty much all the way, so far as I can remember :)
where does a feller get wormwood?
In a land far away and in a time long ago
I “knew a feller” whose job it was
to add 100 ml of phenolpthalein to the incoming
5 gallon cans of pure laboratory grade ethanol
that arrived at the analytical lab.
I, oops I mean he, often took home a few hundred
mls of the unadulterated alcohol.
He told me that it had absolutely no taste and that
it would immediately dewater all of the mucous memranes
in your mouth. I, I mean he, consumed quite a bit of it,
watered down with various mixers, but it was a novelty
item but it had no real “drinking” value on its own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.