Posted on 02/27/2006 11:50:59 AM PST by sofaman
Come one, come all, to the Hannity Show. Constructive criticism welcome...bashing is not.
Happy Monday!
Boy, that would give a whole new meaning to "A slow boat to (and from) China"
This must be in that piece of legislation he said he was going to introduce on the floor today.
See that's why Sean hasn't done enough due diligence. Tony made that point on Tuesday last week. Geeze!
The problem I have with closed session...is that the dems can come out and spin it anyway they want...
and WE won't know the truth...normally, the Republicans could come out and correct them...but, since every Republican other than Warner, that I have heard...is AGAINST this...
so, I don't know if we will ever know the truth..
Thanks sofaman for the thread. You are "good people" as we say here in the mountains of VA.
Why is "the Carpet Kitten" annoying to me?
Not just you.
My god that caller was nuts-- the arabs from UAE have a billion dollars invested in Chrysler the sky is falling. Cant these arabs just pump oil and learn their proper place. We can start them off in amway first and let them build their way to respectible people finance
thanks sage...it was work today!
Yep, all 9,000,000 of them.
Tony Snow is one of the good guys. He never shot from the hip in a rush to the microphone, the researched the issue and discovered that is was much ado about nothing. He didn't sell out.
See you at the Levin Lounge
Can't hear Mark, so I think I'll go upstaris and watch Brit -- if he is on today
He's bringing down the party because of his gut check stubbornness.
Sean is just not as researched and it's bring down the party.
Yep. I think Vannity is playing to the local crowd...unions and crocked NYC politicians.
For him to be right, Franks, Tony, Ridge, Warner all have to be wrong.
Our national security is far too serious for that.
I NEVER said they needed a facility here. I didn't even raise that issue. Don't put words in my mouth.
I said if a dirty bomb does come through one of those six ports on the watch of the UAE, the UAE will be perceived as traitors and it will be disastrous for the conservatives and the Republican Party.
You responded that the UAE has better equipment to prevent the above scenario.
I asked how you know the above, i.e. what is the source of your information?
I then stated ANY damaging security breach on the watch of the UAE would have severe repercussions. I do not believe such considerations are being overly cautious or worrisome. WE ARE AT WAR. We should apply extreme caution.
MY replies to you were civil, sincere and did not include smarmy or mocking remarks. I am genuinely attempting to get at the truth of this issue.
And in return I got from you:
"(are you aware they aready have one in a large city....I thought not)"
Smart a$$ responses do NOT help the case you are attempting to make.
2) The UAE has been working with us to bring that same technology on line in this nation.
3) When we bring it on line we will be able to check 100% of containers entering U.S. ports.
4) Signature radiation from a dirty weapon would already be detected before the container entered a U.S. port; any container sufficiently shielded to prevent such detection would in itself be obvious.
5) We are unnecessarily attacking one of our strongest and most persistent allies in the WoT.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.