Posted on 02/27/2006 11:50:59 AM PST by sofaman
Come one, come all, to the Hannity Show. Constructive criticism welcome...bashing is not.
Happy Monday!
That's true, but they will now include a national security review, which they had not; Congress will now also conduct hearings, which they had denied themselves in the past.
Well, yes, but I work in software, and I sort of understand why you don't want to reveal your customer lists and contacts and methods which make you competitive. That's why secrecy is required. I can see making the information to an oversight committee, but NOT the entire Congress!
This was not a big deal until Schumer made it one, and we all know why he did it. (Unions)
The administration followed the rules the Congress laid down.
UAE has a history with Al-Queda, but so does every other Muslim nation on earth.
Peter King is beholding to the unions also...check his contributions for the last four years.
Honest conservatives that really care about security have been duped, and the ILA, Schumer, Hillary etc. are laughing their asses off.
This would explain why Hannity is still only number two in his own city...after Limbaugh who he savaged today.
You are a good man, and I enjoy reading your stuff when I can.
No, he's much more libertarian than conservative.
So true. This is all such a red herring by the Dems that hate the Prez and the far right ISLAM is the antichrist lets bomb Mecca crowd. I am comfatable with a review but I dont wont this thing to go on for months and months
I was using the White House to refer to the way it was done this last time...
I posted a question to Mark about this...hoping he would know if that new law would have to be written, in order for a new investigation be done a different way than the law, that was written in 1988, set out the process for.
If the contract is public -- not a contract like it, not a form application, etc., etc., -- then post it for all of us to see. I was just told by someone senior in the administration that it is not public.
Thanks. I have put one of my son's names in the lot. I'm waiting to talk to the son in Germany about it first before I stick him in there. Our troops in Germany need it more than anyone. The media over there really stinks.
Until the law is formally repealed, or another law is passed in lieu of it, it remains the law.
I hate when Insight is posted on here. Its has the reliabilty of DEBKA
See you tonight - have to go.
I don't mind a review, but it is just an opportunity for demagoguery.
See ya...looking forward to it!!
Good Afternoon Sir! Just walked in the door and decided to check in on Sean's thread! I guess Mark has been at it with our daily Hannity Thread crashers.
WTG Mark! We love ya!
I think that this review is a good idea, and it sounds like the WH thinks so also. In the end hopefully both sides will be satisfied that all bases were covered, and probably moreso because of this uprising of protest and the subsequent review that is taking place.
Yeah I want this thing over in the time period. Congressman running for reelection will use it for TV time and cheap shots. Too much tempatation to use it for reelection purposes and not for national security, foreign relations will not be at the top of their minds. We got to get this issue past us and quick
Exactly, it's the opportunity for some to try to make their "bones" on the back of this administration.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.