Posted on 02/26/2006 6:42:20 PM PST by george76
Some ranchers say the wolves in the Madison Valley have grown increasingly brazen and are apparently unafraid of people.
State wildlife officials say such behavior is to be expected, given the federal protection the predators have had in the decade since being reintroduced in the Yellowstone National Park.
Jack Atcheson Jr. said he was spooked on a recent hunting trip, when three men and three mules got within 47 yards of a wolf that was staring right at them.
The Butte hunting outfitter, who books international trips, said he had never seen wolves in Alaska, Asia or other places act so boldly around people.
"It was approaching us with the wind right in its face — we were standing around the animals, but he was focused on us," Atcheson, 55, said. "He was not afraid at all."
The wolf finally stopped when one of Atcheson's hunting partners chambered a rifle, while Atcheson snapped a photo. Even then, the wolf merely lay down and stared at the hunters before eventually walking away.
Sunny Smith, manager of the CB Ranch near the Madison Range, said the wolves are "just like domestic dogs."
And with calving season just weeks away, that lack of fear has ranchers worried about the prospect of the wolves attacking livestock.
Barb Durham, a rancher whose herding dog was killed by wolves in 2004, said if ranchers had had more leeway to shoot wolves when they were hanging around ranches that year, federal officials might have needed to kill only a couple wolves instead of eliminating the whole pack.
Wolves have already wandered around their bulls this year, although none of them attacked, she said.
"They have no fear and that's been our contention all along," Durham said. "We don't hate wolves; we just want them to be a natural, wild predator and to be afraid of humans.
"If you don't let us educate them, then there's always going to be conflicts."
Wolves in Montana remain protected under the Endangered Species Act, but their recovery has led the federal government to turn management of the animals over to the state.
State officials said stories such as Atcheson's are a major concern.
"It's totally inappropriate for wolves to be that close," said Carolyn Sime, wolf coordinator for the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.
But she added that it's not that surprising. Wolves in Alaska have been hunted, trapped and harassed for years. And if they spot a human, they immediately run away.
Montana wolves, however, have been protected under federal law for years. Most of them have never been shot at or harassed, and none of them have been hunted.
Sime said elk in the valley pastures are also attracting wolves to the area, and thus closer to homes and livestock.
"If you look at where wolves are setting up, it's not in the backcountry, it's in the valley bottoms and foothills where people live and raise livestock and where ungulates spend winter," she said.
Sime reminds ranchers that with state oversight of the wolves, they have more flexibility to kill or harass wolves that are causing problems. It doesn't allow wolves to be killed on sight, but ranchers don't need a special permit to shoot a wolf that's about to attack livestock.
She said officials hope people take more aggressive action when a wolf is acting brazenly. In Atcheson's incident, he could have fired a rifle shot over the wolf's head to scare it.
"If wolves have uncomfortable experiences around people and livestock, that would be a good thing," she said. "By harassing them now, we may prevent problems later."
One of their goals is to keep people off the public lands. This roadless....Clinton program grabbed millions of acres of public land.
Roadless land means that old and disabled people have no right to access the public lands. Even if there have been county and state roads there for decades.
Having hunters, campers, bikers, hikers, skiiers, our military doing training... "in the wilderness" in bad in their view.
Our public lands were "The Lands of Many Uses." Now they are the lands of no use.
By preventing the removal of wind blown and/or beetle killed trees, the envirnomental community has set up a disaster. We will be having massive fire storms for decades to come.
We will have air pollution during the fires, water pollution from the ash after the fires, then the destruction of the soil and its organic life from the intense fires...
People will die; homes, farms, ranches, live stock, jobs...will be lost.
You are so right. A big problem is all of the money raised by environmental groups is used to file lawuits. They do buy some land, but they do absolutely nothing for the speices they are taking donations in the name of.
I have tried to find out a way to track their political donations. There is no way I can find any way to track msot of their money.
They get alot of money from Robert Kennedy, jr., his foundations, and his friends like Ted Turner, George Soros...
The Sierra Club makes big money when they settle their lawsuits. The settlement agreements often include legal fees for the Sierra Club.
They also have Nature Conservancy and the Federal Tax Code that allows older ranchers and farmers to gain financially.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.