Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anna Nicole Smith's Legal War Continues (Bush Admin Weighs In)
Associated Press ^ | 2-25-06 | Juan A. Lozano

Posted on 02/25/2006 12:43:08 PM PST by Tall_Texan

It's been a long and colorful journey for a girl from a small Texas town.

Anna Nicole Smith went to work in a Houston strip club and wound up as the trophy wife of an aging multimillionaire, setting up an 11-year-long legal war over his estate that now has traveled all the way to the highest court in the land.

The fight over the fortune of oil entrepreneur J. Howard Marshall II between the one-time Playboy Playmate of the Year and Marshall's youngest son, 67-year-old E. Pierce Marshall, goes before the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday.

(snip)

Since then, the case has been through a succession of courtrooms, starting with a state probate court jury in Houston, which ruled in 2001 that Marshall did not leave any of his estate to Smith. A federal bankruptcy judge sided with Smith, another federal judge reduced the award and a federal appeals court ruled that federal courts should never have gotten involved.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday focused solely on the narrow question of whether federal courts can decide cases involving state probate proceedings. The Bush administration has filed briefs favoring federal court jurisdiction.

(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: annanicolesmith; bush; courts; golddigger; libertarians; probate; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Tall_Texan

If you're smart and want your money's worth, $1 at a time.


21 posted on 02/25/2006 2:15:43 PM PST by krb (ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Does it say if she wants the money in one lump-sum, or in two lumps?


22 posted on 02/25/2006 2:16:35 PM PST by krb (ad hominem arguments are for stupid people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeorgefromGeorgia
If this picture from 2004 is any indication, she's lost a great deal of weight.



While I still wouldn't touch her with a 10 foot pole, she's no longer a "blimp" as you can plainly see.
23 posted on 02/25/2006 2:20:18 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: krb
If you're smart and want your money's worth, $1 at a time.

LOL. That's what I was going to say.

24 posted on 02/25/2006 2:24:18 PM PST by NeoCaveman (The shark has been jumped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mount Athos
Anyone whoever saw the elderly man only had to take one look to know he was senile. She married him for the money, and she shouldn't prosper for being a sordid gold-digger.
25 posted on 02/25/2006 2:26:47 PM PST by PeskyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kjo

Anna Nicole doesn't look so good when she puts on 50 pounds, which happens frequently.


26 posted on 02/25/2006 2:51:08 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
And if the lawyers can string this out long enough, they'll be able to systematically transfer all the money into their accounts, eliminating the problem altogether.
27 posted on 02/25/2006 2:52:55 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne

She gave him the best year of her life.


28 posted on 02/25/2006 2:53:38 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
who knows what result here wiles might work on SCOTUS? LOL!

Are you suggesting Justice Ginsburg might try to hit on her? :P

29 posted on 02/25/2006 3:04:17 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Zoidberg

Who's the chick next to her? That's more my type.


30 posted on 02/25/2006 3:05:02 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

No clue, I just found the clip on some fans site.


31 posted on 02/25/2006 3:06:51 PM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (Mohammedism - Bringing you only the best of the 6th century for fourteen hundred years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
The reason there should be Federal courts over the state ones at times is exactly a case like this where the local courts were in the pockets of the son.

She did NOT go after him, he went after her and did things with her for years before she married him.

He made his choice to marry her and she deserves the consideration a spouse would normally get.

Problem is, you had a Boss Hog situation here where the courts were dirty, so if the Federal court at times can't overrule state injustice, then lots of people who can't buy a state judge will get screwed regularly.
32 posted on 02/25/2006 3:14:18 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

Thank you for calling our entire state's legal system corrupt.

You guys can't even hold an execution and you want to rip on *our* courts???


33 posted on 02/25/2006 3:19:12 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
The ones dealing with this case were absolutely dirty, no question.
In any similar other case where logic flys out the window in favor of the local boys, you bet those screwed deserve Federal overseeing.

The old guy went after her for a bunch of years, she did not continually go after him.

She does deserve millions.

If someone got ripped in court by a bias leaning judicial machine for some California person, I would hope they get a remedy as well.

We saw how Florida was corrupt in 2000, so if Texas is doing the same thing in favor of the old guys kids, then there does need to be Federal over-site.
34 posted on 02/25/2006 3:25:57 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan; Mount Athos
It is my understanding (perhaps incorrect) that California is involved as well. I believe that Smith did not like the ruling and filed in California and got a different settlement or the original filing was in California and the family then filed in Texas. or some such.

In essence, what is needed but has not been established by Congress, is what rules need to be followed as to deciding the preferred state for dealing with these type of probate and other civil issues.
35 posted on 02/25/2006 3:52:52 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I think she lived in California and that is where she got her 88 million dollar award (i could be wrong on that though).


36 posted on 02/25/2006 3:55:37 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan

"I don't really care for the classless, gold-digging tub of goo but what shocks me is how the Bush administration thinks there is a federal case here"

The Federalists never sleep.


37 posted on 02/25/2006 3:58:07 PM PST by dljordan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeskyOne
I agree with you. The man was senile, and she married him just to rip him off. I saw a portion of one of her court appearances, and she was revolting, crude, and vicious - the kind I could see committing murder.
38 posted on 02/25/2006 4:04:14 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
In the final analysis, it's not about personalities, relationships, or anything most of us find important.

It's about taxes.

The beast must be fed.

39 posted on 02/25/2006 4:48:23 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper
The beast must be fed.

Does that make Anna a beastfeeder? ;P

40 posted on 02/25/2006 4:53:33 PM PST by Tall_Texan (Hate means never having to say you're crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson