Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ratner's Anti-Globalization Rant: No Foreigners Should Own Ports
Fox & Friends Weekend/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 02/25/2006 5:15:41 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last
To: Dane
Ooooh, Dane!!

Answer a question with a non-sequitor question. How diabolical of you.

21 posted on 02/25/2006 5:29:48 AM PST by raybbr (ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Continued the suddenly jingoistic Ratner: "Why don't we have American companies owning some ports in China or Dubai or anywhere else? Why has American business given up on this? We're a strong country. We ought to be owning ports."


Ratner has some valid questions, however, I wonder does she support closing down Gitmo, or the "no profiling" legislation getting penned in Congress. Does she support McCain's illegal invasion legislation?

These liberals were in a global love fest while Clintonism was reaping foreign monies to get reelected and those special transfers of security intel, or JFKerry singing his can't we all just get along prez campaign.

These liberals in one breath sound like terrorist moooolahs and in the next breath sound like the 60's hippies. Wait maybe there is no difference when all layers are peeled away.
22 posted on 02/25/2006 5:30:44 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Answer a question with a non-sequitor question. How diabolical of you

It's not a non-sequitor. Ratner who had no problem with hillary pushing deals with the chicomms is all of the sudden outraged and is obviously pandering to you like a woman in a fake fur working on a streetcorner and she has your tongue wagging.

23 posted on 02/25/2006 5:34:09 AM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts; All

If Pres. Bush had publicly announced that he had vetoed a proposed UAE port deal, I am absolutely convinced that Ratner would have been on there today denouncing Bush for anti-Arab bigotry and ethnic profiling.

Ratner has only one guiding principle: hatred of Republicans and opposition to anything proposed by the Bush administration.


24 posted on 02/25/2006 5:34:29 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Oh god here we're go again. Can I just point out, for the gazillionth time, that no foreigners are going to "own" our ports?

Ratner has lost it. Apparently we're supposed to conjure into existence an American company capable of and willing to manage these ports.

Or does she want the government to take control of them? Just what we need, bigger government running more stuff.


25 posted on 02/25/2006 5:35:16 AM PST by fragrant abuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Why do you guys seem so determined for America to offshore, outsource and capitulate to foreign govts?

1. In many cases, there are no U.S. companies or workers who will or can do the job?

2. It's reciprocal. Companies in the U.S. have holdings in other countries and they have holdings in ours. Cutting off that reciprocity would mean a huge number of U.S. employees would be out on the streets and many jobs there will be no one to do many of the jobs that need to be done here.

3. We're not capitulating to a foreign government. DWP is a private company.

Like it or not, we participate in a global economy and if we didn't, my husband and I, for sure, would not have jobs and would be living in our pop up somewhere growing our own fruits and vegetables.

26 posted on 02/25/2006 5:35:34 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Why don't we have American companies owning some ports in China or Dubai or anywhere else?"

Some people here would call that outsourcing, Ellen.

27 posted on 02/25/2006 5:35:42 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Only Americans running ports?

Would that be only the white Americans, who can trace their family tree to the Mayflower?

She can't mean the "other" Americans like Afro-Americans, Puerto Ricans, Italians, etc. etc. that have assimilated, or illegals, and other assorted Riff Raff, that have been given "rights" by the liberal establishment, can she?


And these "Americans"? Do they swear on the Holy Grail that they will be ever faithful to the United States, like John Effin Kerry, Turban Durbin, Chappaquiddick Kennedy? Or do they just have to have the intelligence of Hillary Clinton, Sheila Jackson Lee and Major Owens?


Someone turn on the bilge pumps. We're going down! ;)






28 posted on 02/25/2006 5:36:30 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Lots of division on the left and right on this topic. As I stated on JimRob's thread I haven't studied it in depth but I lean slightly for the deal.

Thanks for the ping. Interesting thread.


29 posted on 02/25/2006 5:37:15 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
Was that said with a lisp? Just asking cause I just looked at your picture on your profile page.

LOL. Careful.....you may be reported for "abuthe", you brute!

30 posted on 02/25/2006 5:38:04 AM PST by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Are there any American companies in this line of business or that bid for the operations? I heard that another bidder was a company in Hong Kong. I guess that would be better, having them run by a Chinese Communist company.

The solution from liberals is predictable, let the government take over running the operations. Now that's scary...

31 posted on 02/25/2006 5:38:18 AM PST by Russ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Thanks, PG. I haven't seen so much internecine warfare at FR since the Harriet Miers fiasco.


32 posted on 02/25/2006 5:38:26 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
He could care less about ports and whatever...In his mind....

IT'S ALL ABOUT BUSH!!

33 posted on 02/25/2006 5:39:22 AM PST by Dallas59 ((“You love life, while we love death"( Al-Qaeda & Democratic Party))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
3. We're not capitulating to a foreign government. DWP is a private company.

It is a company partly owned by the state of Dubai.

34 posted on 02/25/2006 5:40:57 AM PST by raybbr (ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Numb skull Ratner doesn't know that we DO OWN our ports. I haven't heard a word from her or other dems about Carter;s GIVING away the Panama Canal, which the Chinese now control.....or the Chinese operating the California ports.

Memo to Sen. Diane Feinstein: Did YOU object to the Chinese/Singapore operating in your state, or did you and your husband benefit financially from it?

35 posted on 02/25/2006 5:41:07 AM PST by Carolinamom (I don't believe in a government that protects us from ourselves. ---Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Continued the suddenly jingoistic Ratner: "Why don't we have American companies owning some ports in China or Dubai or anywhere else? Why has American business given up on this? We're a strong country. We ought to be owning ports."

I'd like to ask Ratner why don't we "operate" ports right here in America? No American Companies "lease" terminals in the US.

36 posted on 02/25/2006 5:41:40 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
"So....let me get this straight. In the 90's it was OK for the Chinese getting a quantum boost from Loral in their missile technology. It was also fine for Chinese owned Hutchinson Lampoa to have control over the ports at the Panama canal."

You failed to mention the millions that the Chi-coms pored into clinton's campaign coffers and the millions they paid for that presidential "whorehouse" in Little Rock!
37 posted on 02/25/2006 5:42:12 AM PST by JLGALT (Get ready - Lock and Load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: edpc

:D I hope that he doesn't take it personally. LOL just messin' around


38 posted on 02/25/2006 5:43:50 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Maybe we can convince the UAE to take over the Media rather than the Ports.

Mark, thank you for your wonderful reports here on FR. I read everything you write and really appreciate your dedication and efforts.

39 posted on 02/25/2006 5:44:39 AM PST by jigsaw (David Gregory, star of the Kindergarten media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ellen Ratner must want folks like these running our ports:

Image hosting by Photobucket

40 posted on 02/25/2006 5:45:17 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-173 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson