Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ratner's Anti-Globalization Rant: No Foreigners Should Own Ports
Fox & Friends Weekend/NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 02/25/2006 5:15:41 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last
To: aligncare
Because it seems to me that some on this thread are not making the same distinction that I see, between 'Jihadists' and 'Arabs or Muslims'.

And, some on this thread, and others, are lumping those opposed to this deal as something pretty negative, as well.

Muslims are just fellow Americans to me. Some good, some bad. As long as they love America, I'll stand with them - especially if they're conservatives ;-)

My sister married a Pakistani man. He's a great guy, although he had three marriages (my sister is #3). I agree with that.

My problem with this deal is the way it has been dealt with. Almost in secret. We have people on this site rabidly defending a deal they know nothing about. We also have people rabidly opposing this deal they know nothing about.

Why couldn't this have been handled in a more publice way? We have a govt. agency doing research on this sale and yet it was attempted to push this deal through under the table. Even the president and vice-president didn't know about it (they claim).

If it had been handled in an open and above-board way I am sure almost no one would have opposed it. The way it was handled provided the ammunition to oppose it.

161 posted on 02/25/2006 10:04:55 AM PST by raybbr (ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: LK44-40

I'll accept the thanks. Mark Finkelstein is me, governsleastgovernsbest!


162 posted on 02/25/2006 10:34:44 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Many thanks, as always, Lancey.


163 posted on 02/25/2006 11:00:05 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: LK44-40

By the way, I don't consider it xenophobic to oppose this deal. I can certainly see the argument against letting UAE take over. But when Ratner says she would also exclude the British and Canadians, then either she's xenphobic or, better yet, an extreme protectionist.


164 posted on 02/25/2006 11:03:26 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (Watching the Today Show Since 2002 So You Don't Have To.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

You're right it did appear secretive to me too when I first learned of the deal. But then I learned that that's the way the law (that set up this secret process) was written by congress. The law specifically left congress (and upper level administration) out of the process until the end after the decision has been made.


165 posted on 02/25/2006 3:21:25 PM PST by aligncare (Watergate killed journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
I've bolded exactly why we SHOULD fear them.

that goes for China as well.

166 posted on 02/25/2006 3:38:17 PM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat
I'm Catholic and I am aware of a certain anti Catholic bias in our culture. For years those Catholics seeking high political office were considered suspect - worry about divided loyalty to the Pope. Some in the Muslim world - the fundamentalist Jihadists - may indeed want to rekindle the crusades, but I suspect the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful and will simply adapt the teachings of the Quran to the modern world - much as some of the more archaic teachings of the Christian Bible have been read with a less literal interpretation.
167 posted on 02/25/2006 4:02:30 PM PST by aligncare (Watergate killed journalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Rat woman is as dumb as a stump.

I have no idea what qualifications she has to be on my TV.

But she ain't as bad as that ah, ah, ah, ah, ah, ah Julian.


168 posted on 02/25/2006 4:07:32 PM PST by Beckwith (The liberal press has picked sides ... and they have sided with the Islamofascists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aligncare

I hear ya. Even today, I think being Catholic has a certain stigma to it in politics. I was raised Catholic as well.

As to your points, I think we're on the same sheet. What you seem to be saying in essence is that the apostate muslims are more prone to simply living in peace with others. If so, then I agree. But you must remember, and the same stands for Christianity although one's a faith in God, the other is a faith in a made up god, that for either one, you can't simply deviate what it is from its foundational underpinnings.

Eg., Christ is the foundation of the Christian faith. Disprove either his existence, his resurrection, or his ascension, and you've successfully disproven Christianity. Far more brilliant men than us have tried, some animously, and have been turned towards the truth and light of the gospel. Regardless, it's been twisted and contorted today, and that displeases God. What society does with it can be independent from what God looks for in us.

Islam's book is the Koran. Unlike the Bible, in which Jesus Christ commands Christians to live in peace and do unto others as they would have done unto them, and love others, the Koran calls for the domination of non-islamic peoples and what essentially boils down to forced conversions "or else." While Christianity values women inherently, Islam and the Koran place women in a lower class than men essentially. It does the same for non-muslims.

So while it's easy to deal with apostate muslims, it is nearly impossible to deal with fundamentalist muslims as you say. The big problem is that you can't distinguish between the two outwardly reducing any such efforts to a guessing game. Yet, by allowing muslim fundamentalists to integrate into a society, unless one guesses with 100% accuracy, an extreme unlikelihood, troubles are bound to occur.

As well, the root of muslim issues, namely terror and general societal won't ever go away as long as they're in the source tome for Islam. Christianity is the opposite. If everyone Christian adhered to Biblical teaching, then the world would be a much better place.

So "deviant" Islam is good, fundamental Islam is bad. Deviant Christianity can be "good" in the same sense that it likely will not cause societal woes of the magnitude and breadth that fundamental Islam will. It may cause moral woes and issues, but those are not of the variety that necessarily threaten the lives of others. Either way, fundamental Christianity does no one harm, and in fact is good in spite of people that think morality is somehow bad.

The bottom line, it's futile to hold out expecting the entire Islamic community to become apostate to one degree or another. It'll never happen, and the risks are far too great for societies that desire to remain civil to allow Islam to spread to the extent that it already has in many nations.

Unfortunately, as has been the case throughout history, even on this issue, what isn't clear to many today, will become crystal clear "tomorrow."


169 posted on 02/25/2006 5:26:27 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
OK, read carefully -- this may be hard for you to follow.

Pointing out a hypocrisy does NOT mean you agree with the point made in the hypocritical statement.

Knee jerk conclusions based on no analytical thinking are definitely traits of a dumb@ss liberal.
170 posted on 02/26/2006 5:26:29 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
OK, read carefully -- this may be hard for you to follow.

Oooooh. Condescension. That certainsly bodes well for this post.

Pointing out a hypocrisy does NOT mean you agree with the point made in the hypocritical statement.

Then what's your point?

Knee jerk conclusions based on no analytical thinking are definitely traits of a dumb@ss liberal.

Maybe. But, sometimes it applies to posters on site, as well.

171 posted on 02/26/2006 6:09:26 AM PST by raybbr (ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
"Oooooh. Condescension. That certainsly bodes well for this post."

If that's not your cup of tea why did you start it? (That's a rhetorical question.)


"Then what's your point?"

Well, I did acknowledge it would be hard for you to understand. Thanks for proving me right.

"Maybe. But, sometimes it applies to posters on site, as well."

Ah,self admission is good for the soul.

Give it up, you're way out of you're league.
172 posted on 02/26/2006 6:45:32 AM PST by Lee'sGhost (Crom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
If that's not your cup of tea why did you start it? (That's a rhetorical question.)

No. It's not. It's a banal question. I did not start the condescension.

Well, I did acknowledge it would be hard for you to understand. Thanks for proving me right.

Not really. I guess I have to be less circumspect and more adroit. "What's your point?" referred to your pointing out someone's hypocrisy and then claiming you don't agree with the opposing viewpoint. Again, why post the hypocrisy if it's something you agree with.

Ah,self admission is good for the soul.

Again, I was referring to you. But, you knew that. I left it just ambiguous enough for you to expose yourself.

Give it up, you're way out of you're league.

I do not pretend to know everything and try to keep an open mind on any issue that does not include compromising one's morals. I hope to keep learning and expanding my knowledge until the day I die.

I guess that means you are finished having an open mind and learning?

173 posted on 02/26/2006 7:39:12 AM PST by raybbr (ANWR is a barren, frozen wasteland - like the mind of a democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-173 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson