Posted on 02/24/2006 7:06:28 AM PST by Pharmboy
Kennewick Man was laid to rest alongside a river more than 9,000 years ago, buried by other people, a leading forensic scientist said Thursday.
The skeleton, one of the oldest and most complete ever found in North America, has been under close analysis since courts sided with researchers in a legal battle with Indian tribes in the Northwest who wanted the remains found near the Columbia River reburied without study.
Douglas Owsley, an anthropologist at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History, discussed his findings in remarks prepared for delivery Thursday evening at a meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in Seattle.
"We know very little about this time period," Owsley said in a telephone interview. "This is a rare opportunity to try and reconstruct the life story of this man. ... This is his opportunity to tell us what life was like during that time."
Researchers have disagreed over whether Kennewick Man was buried by other people or swept up in a flood and encased in sediment.
Owsley concluded the man was deliberately buried, between two and three feet deep, his body placed in the grave, head slightly higher than feet, hands placed at his sides.
The location was riverside, with the body parallel to the river and head pointing upstream.
Using an industrial CT scanner, Owsley was able to study the skeleton in fine sections and also get a better look at a spear or dart point imbedded in Kennewick Man's hip.
The point has previously been described as a Cascade point, typical of the region, but Owsley said that is not the case. Cascade points tend to have two pointed ends and are sometimes serrated, he said, while the point in Kennewick Man has a pointed end and a stem.
The spear or dart entered the man from the front, moving downward at a 77-degree angle, Owsley said. Previous analysis had indicated it might have hit from the back, he noted.
The point was not the cause of death, he said, saying, "This is a healed injury."
"There was no clear indication in the skeleton of cause of death," Owsley said. Kennewick Man had undergone "a lot of injuries, this guy was tough as nails."
There are three types of fractures in the bones, Owsley said, ones the man suffered in his lifetime and which had healed; fractures that occurred after burial from aging of the bones and the ground settling, and breaks that occurred when the skeleton was unearthed.
A team of 20 forensic scientists has been studying the skeleton, he said, and have concluded that the skull doesn't match those of Indian tribes living in the area.
"We know very little about this time period. Who the people were that were the earliest people that came to America," Owsley said. "We are finding out they were coming thousands of years earlier than we had thought," arriving not just over the Bering Strait but by boats and other means.
"This is a very rare discovery. You could count on your fingers the number of relatively complete skeletons from this time period," Owsley said.
Following discovery of the bones in 1996, the Umatilla, Yakama, Nez Perce and Colville tribes urged that the skeleton be reburied without scientific study. They argued that the bones were covered under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act.
Scientists sued for a chance to study the remains and a federal court ruled there was no link between the skeleton and the tribes.
___
On the Net:
Smithsonian Natural History Museum: http://www.mnh.si.edu
American Academy of Forensic Sciences: http://www.aafs.org
Pinging...
A very similar story was already posted--please pull this thread. Thanks...
Indeed.
Kinda wrecks the Indians' claims to "Native American" status as Kennewick Man predates them. That's why the Indians wanted to squash the scientific inquiry.
Yup. Some are more equal. They can have casinos.
He's dead Jim....
A very similar story may have been posted, but I didn't see it. Do you think every FReeper sits in front of their computer 24/7? I like reposts, because they allow those of us who have a separate life to catch articles that would otherwise have gone missed. Geez, what's with the repost police, anyway?
The indians did not want it know the remains were from a white man of european descent here 9,000 years before them.
"buried by other people, a leading forensic scientist said Thursday" so...he didnt bury himself?
previously been described as a Cascade point, typical of the region, but Owsley said that is not the case
The spear or dart entered the man from the front, moving downward at a 77-degree angle, Owsley said. Previous analysis had indicated it might have hit from the back, he noted.
thousands of years earlier than we had thought
Either this was a seriously thorough study or the earlier ones were seriously flawed, or there seems so revisionist history going on. I am not disputing any of it, but it just seems, to me, that so much is being revamped all at one time. Am I missing something here or is this typical or when a "study" is released? If so what were the other assumptions based off of? Study or theory?
Please not, this topic interests me very much and this post was not done as a disrupter or sarcasm post. Any serious feedback will be appreciated. Thanks
I had a similar thought -- the locals want him quickly buried, before any 'descendents' can show up and demand their own casino sites...
When I searched "Kennewick" I found this post, but I didn't read it since the headline did not match. When I read it, I realized it was a very similar story.
I did not mean to offend...
Well, whenever we try and read events that happened thousands of years ago, it's always frought with inconsistency and changes in interpretation. This is a very inexact science, no question...
They can't even agree on what happened to the body found in Fort Marcy Park a few years ago.
EXCELLENT point...
p.s. I like reposts too.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.