Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W. Bush is about to fritter away his party's last advantage.
Washington Times ^ | February 24, 2006 | Wes Pruden

Posted on 02/24/2006 4:57:39 AM PST by When_Penguins_Attack

George W. Bush is about to fritter away his party's last advantage. What Republicans have had going for them is that they aren't Democrats. Over the past few days we've seen the men at the top of the Grumpy Old Party drifting toward something that looks suspiciously like an Old Boys' Party. When he hears applause only from Jimmy Carter, who gave away the Panama Canal (now controlled by the Chinese), and Bill Clinton, his newly adopted little brother, George W. should be looking for the panic button. Once they're no longer regarded as the toughest party on national security the Republicans will be burnt toast.

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bushbotattack; bushbots; ports; wespruden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-391 next last
To: Javelina
Ok. We're both on record. I think this only strengthens Bush, because the Dems cannot, inherently, be for a strong defense or national security. Every time this issue is mentioned, what it is doing is reminding people that (whatever your view on the ports is), ONLY Bush has been "out there" fighting for national security.

There is only, IMHO, one way that this issue could conceivably help the Dems, and that is if it's made into a UNION issue, but even then, people are intrinsically anti-union.

301 posted on 02/24/2006 9:02:08 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

Yet the Saudi national shipping company has run ports here since 1997.


302 posted on 02/24/2006 9:03:15 AM PST by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid

No, they bid on that contract from the company that already has the contracts. Singapore also bid, DP World won the bid.


303 posted on 02/24/2006 9:06:51 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: kaktuskid
DP is buying the company that already has the contracts.



^^^^^^

And the folks who are upset because President Bush did not know about this specific transaction, do not seem to care that local politicians are/were not aware of who are at present handling these contracts in the ports.

The amount of openly expressed ignorance has been very disturbing.
304 posted on 02/24/2006 9:07:34 AM PST by maica (We are fighting the War for the Free World. Democrats and the media are not on our side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

Comment #305 Removed by Moderator

To: CWOJackson

I've already told you that I didn't establish those procedures, so I'm not second-guessing them. I think it's my right and obligation to get the facts and to hold my elected officials accountable. I certainly don't think that's a waste of time.


306 posted on 02/24/2006 9:13:48 AM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: RealistCA
"After all we heard after 9/11 and the buildup to Iraq, it's now okay to hand over control to our most vulerable point of entry to an Arab country that doesn't recognize Isreal or allow democratic elections?"

You must mean the Arab country that we already rely upon for the port operations that provide logistics support to our troops fighting this war. That Arab country that maintains the largest port services for U.S. Navy ships of any nation outside of the U.S.

That Arab nation that General Tommy Franks considers our valued friend in the WoT. That Arab nation right?

307 posted on 02/24/2006 9:14:23 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: seanmerc

Yes, stopping every financial contract within the U.S. that involves foreign companies until everyone is totally happy wouldn't be a waste of time...it would be economic suicide.


308 posted on 02/24/2006 9:18:16 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

You keep citing Tommy Franks as the standard. I hold Tommy Franks in very high regard. His opinion carries a lot of weight with me. However, Tommy Franks' opinion (as knowledgeable and informed as it may be) is just that. Maybe I could be an honorary Missourian, because I want my President and representatives to SHOW ME.


309 posted on 02/24/2006 9:20:06 AM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

Comment #310 Removed by Moderator

To: maica
The amount of openly expressed ignorance has been very disturbing.

Yet, we are told ad nauseam by the same officials, that there are no security issues.

Which begs yet another question: Why did Congress make these proceeding secret in the first place? Even shareholders have a right to know what is going on, and how does a public presentation of these applications in any way endanger security?

Perhaps they simply do not want the public to know that they have sold off (ok they leased for 30 years) major chunks of the publically owned assests of our nation.
311 posted on 02/24/2006 9:24:01 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: RealistCA

It is the money...the whole fabricated non-crisis is being driven by the unions.


312 posted on 02/24/2006 9:24:50 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: RealistCA; Taxman; Gelato

I wish this administration had been willing to invest this much energy and political capital in fundamental tax reform.


313 posted on 02/24/2006 9:25:04 AM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
If they didn't have to waste some much time on nonsense like this they might. What was it last week, the gunslinger VP, this week union driven hysteria.
314 posted on 02/24/2006 9:27:00 AM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Your projection is just that ...projection. As for cults, enjoy worshipping with the Liberals.


315 posted on 02/24/2006 9:29:10 AM PST by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

I would disagree with you, the port deal has been water cooler conversation at my work off and on all week. About 2/3 against and most critical of GW.




that's a big ditto for me as well...


316 posted on 02/24/2006 9:29:24 AM PST by countreegurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
If they didn't have to waste some much time on nonsense like this they might.

It was a total loser from the very beginning. Hard to understand why no one in the White House could see that.

317 posted on 02/24/2006 9:30:47 AM PST by EternalVigilance (www.usbordersecurity.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Let's see what will be done to you when Democrats gain control and trust me they will. After the Left tested you guys with this Port story, they are patting each other on the back as I type.

Have fun when they are elected and take control but do not think they will give you credit for their win.


318 posted on 02/24/2006 9:31:32 AM PST by Paige ("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

You apparently don't understand what I have said or you're intentionally misrepresenting my position. Go back to the beginning of the thread, open your eyes and read what I have said.

I never advocated stopping every financial contract that involves foreign companies until everyone is totally happy with it. You are being absurd and misleading by suggesting that that is what I want.

I am simply trying to hold my leaders accountable. I will not stick my head in the sand and trust Big Government to know what's best for me. When I have questions, I will ask them. That is every citizen's right, duty and obligation.

The government exists to serve me and my fellow citizens. We do not exist to serve the government. We are all part owners of the government. The primary function of the federal government is to provide for national defense. That concerns every one of us. If the government is taking an action that we don't understand, we should ask our leaders for an explanation. That isn't a "waste of time", as you put it. That is democracy and it is NOT a spectator sport.


319 posted on 02/24/2006 9:31:49 AM PST by seanmerc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Of course, the way the media has been portraying it...like we are giving them control of our ports, which is not really the case.


320 posted on 02/24/2006 9:32:39 AM PST by rwfromkansas (http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 381-391 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson