Posted on 02/23/2006 8:50:48 AM PST by edcoil
Quantum computer works best switched off
Even for the crazy world of quantum mechanics, this one is twisted. A quantum computer program has produced an answer without actually running.
The idea behind the feat, first proposed in 1998, is to put a quantum computer into a superposition, a state in which it is both running and not running. It is as if you asked Schrödinger's cat to hit "Run".
With the right set-up, the theory suggested, the computer would sometimes get an answer out of the computer even though the program did not run. And now researchers from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign have improved on the original design and built a non-running quantum computer that really works.
The Haves.
I guess it depends on what the meaning of "running" is.
I think anyone who does claim to fully get quantum mechanics is lying.
That's the best way to describe quantum mechanics I've heard so far. Thanks.
I may have to rethink my tag line...
What is the explanation for this statement?
I haven't thought about this too hard, but why doesn't a good bomb act like an observation, and collapse the wavefuntion prior to points C or D?
Guess the H.A.L. program didn't pan out...
HAL became operational on January 12, 1997 (1992 in the movie) [1] at the H.A.L. Laboratory in Urbana, Illinois, and was created by Dr. Chandra
It does...and that's precisely why this scheme works!
In the "dud" case, there's no measurement, so there's a superposition of paths: the single photon takes both the clockwise (or upper) path AND the counter-clockwise (or lower) path. The two superposed wavefunctions cancel at C and constructively interfere at D.
In the "good bomb" case, there is a measurement, as you point out: either the bomb goes off, telling you it took the counter-clockwise (lower) path, or it doesn't, telling you it took the clockwise (upper) path. Those two possibilities are not superposed, so they can't interfere. The photon is forced by the measurement to take either one path or the other, but not both. But if it takes the pure clockwise (upper) path, it still has a 50% chance of being reflected to C by the half-silvered mirror in the C-D corner. So in 25% of the "good bomb" cases, you see no explosion, but measure the photon at detector C, which can never happen in the "dud" case. (50% of the time, the bomb goes off, and 25% of the time the photon ends up at detector D, which looks just like 100% of the "dud" cases).
Just a guess--I haven't read beyond this excerpt--but if the errors in quantum computation are caused by decoherence within the system, then perhaps that is obviated by the system not actually performing the calculation. What counts here is the potential for the system to have performed the calculation. Again, just a guess.
I had someone from Diebold tell me that the results of an election can be ascertained with 100% accuracy even before the election takes place.
So did the carpet match the drapes?
Actually, all the bombs explode - that is, in other worlds. According to the MWI, you kind of cheat the universe splitting, and you get to keep some good bombs that DID explode in another universe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.