Posted on 02/22/2006 4:34:50 PM PST by johnmecainrino
Bush didn't know because congress mandated for this foreign service group to keep the decisions secret. The group only informs the president if they go to an extended period of review and then reject it. No one on the top white house staff knew. It was done by middle level bueracracy mostly in these agencies. Congress mandated the process by non political and kept secret.
Congress didn't know because it is a federal crime to talk about the specifics of the deal. Again congress mandated it be secret and now they are screaming how bush didn't inform them.
Based on the law congress passed in 1988 Bush couldn't have reversed the deal after it was approved by this committee. The law states that after the deal was approved by the committee bush or the committee can only go back and review the deal if the company lied to them on the application.
On MSNBC right now we are hearing how bush was out of the loop again and all the bs. That was the law. And when I hear congress complaining about the secrecy, damn them they wrote the law that way to protect the propriety of the companies.
Scott McClellan has to be the worst press secretary ever. He didn't even know today that the american unions would still be involved and that homeland security got in the deal to do a background check before anyone can enter the facility that works for the company.
Bush needs to go on national TV primetime to stop the lies. Worst of all a lot of the lies are being spread by peter king who is clueless on the 1988 law that was written. If he is so upset change the law instead of blaming bush for a law congress mandated.
For crying out loud? Didn't I just say I am agreeing with it the more I learn about it? Sheesh. You flame people even when they agree with you?
I just watched Peter on O'Reilly. Why does he look different? Face lift? Contact lenses? Tinted hair for sure.
We should keep a running list of these lies, misconceptions, and outright fabrications.
You didn't number yours, so I'll start with mine:
Myth #1: This deal was hatched in secret in the last couple of weeks without any knowledge on the part of our highly-esteemed leaders in Congress like Chuck Schumer, Peter King, etc.
Fact: The acquisition of P&O Ports by Dubai Ports World was formally announced on November 29, 2005. The fact that people like Schumer, King, etc. waited until mid-February to express their "concerns" about a corporate acquisition that was made public in November of last year tells me they are either too ignorant and incompetent to dress themselves in the morning, or they are just opportunistic, self-aggrandizing @ssholes.
The above will keep someone active for a while.
Name me one other thing Bush has threatened to veto. Can you? He claims he only heard about it on Wednesday - and Thursday he's out making threats?
Oh yea and he has done such a marvelous job protecting our Southern and Northern borders.
I am sorry you resorted to name calling instead of facts. FWIW I don't give a rats a$$ what Hildebeast thinks.
Hmmm...
Made public last fall, and just now being amplified and contorted into something that inflames the masses...
Sounds familiar, can't quite put my finger...
man some of the most ill-informed people on this forum are having a field day with this...
thank you for your rational and well thought out post.
"They" will NOT be runing security!
So what will "they" be doing?
This may be a state-run business running the ports, but it is a business. For them, this is an investment, a means of making money...capitalism.
Last night, I posted a link indicating a California company is investing a quarter billion dollars in Dubai for a tourist space port. Dubai businessmen will be investing, too, to make a profit. More capitalism. (will repost the link after posting this)
I just do not believe that this is as sinister as it seems, but I will admit that with all the thermonuclear heat that this subject is generating, more light is being shed on the need for tougher port security in general. That is "our" job and will continue to be so.
She will regret it. Probably already does but thinks she has to stick to her guns or look foolish.
Port security is run by Americans. Write it on the black board a million times. Port security is run by Americans.
The company will do the business at the specific terminal at the port...that is, unloading stuff, directing it to where it needs to go, etc.
"US Company Plans $265M Spaceport in UAE"
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/396279/us_company_plans_265m_spaceport_in_uae/index.html
bttt
Bingo. Even if you're against this, it doesn't deserve the kvetching that it's received. A lot of red faces in blogland and some aren't willing to admit it.
so if i understand you correctly, they are in charge of unloading freight and the general upkeep of the port, but have nothing to do with any security operations (i.e. assisting with inspections or securing the site)?
If there is any whiff that it came through a UAE-run port, Dubai will be a former Emirate. It's much less likely for terrorism to go through the ports now than through ports run by the squishy multi-culti Brits.
Correct. Homeland Security, Coast Guard, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.