Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Bush Didn't Know About Port Deal
FNC ^ | February 22, 2006

Posted on 02/22/2006 8:31:23 AM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON — President Bush was unaware that a controversial deal to sell shipping operations at six major U.S. seaportsto a United Arab Emirates-owned firm was in the works until it was approved by his administration, the White House said Wednesday.

After Bush repeatedly

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: botscirclewagons; bush43; bushcantbewrongcanhe; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-316 next last
To: Coop
30+45=75<90

So therefore, the 45 day review needed to be within the 90 day timeframe. Failing to perform the review within the 90 days does not negate the requirement to perform it. You are putting the cart in front of the horse here (surprise).

261 posted on 02/22/2006 10:45:44 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

You're completely lost in your own spin. Try again. A 30-day review is mandated; an extended 45-day review (aka investigation) is not mandated unless two specific criteria are met.


262 posted on 02/22/2006 10:51:17 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Try again. A 30-day review is mandated; an extended 45-day review (aka investigation) is not mandated unless two specific criteria are met.

And those were met. You were trying to claim that, because the 45-day review was not done within 90 days, that obviated the need to do such.

So you're the one spinning here (surprise again).

263 posted on 02/22/2006 10:54:07 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

The heroin doesn't come from Dubai.

It comes through Dubai.

A simple web search will show you that.

They're famous for it.


264 posted on 02/22/2006 10:58:01 AM PST by voteconstitutionparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; jimbo123
You were trying to claim that, because the 45-day review was not done within 90 days, that obviated the need to do such.

Really? Then you should have no problem producing my post saying such a thing.

I was saying of the two bullets shown in the statute and provided up above by jimbo, only one of those had been met.

As I said earlier, you're having a great deal of difficulty keeping up with the most basic of things on this thread (like who posted what). But I admire your perseverance. You keep dragging yourself right back up after getting kicked to the ground.

Hey... dirtboy! Now I get it!!

265 posted on 02/22/2006 11:00:00 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Coop
A 30-day review is mandated; an extended 45-day review (aka investigation) is not mandated unless two specific criteria are met.

And the two criteria are:

o the acquirer is controlled by or acting on behalf of a foreign government; and

o the acquisition "could result in control of a person engaged in interstate commerce in the U.S. that could affect the national security of the U.S."

Sounds like the two criteria were clearly met to me.

266 posted on 02/22/2006 11:00:57 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
And it sounds like they weren't met to me. Tell you what, you, Harry Reid, and all your friends are right. Me, the Attorney General, his staff, DoD, SecTreas, Dubya and others are all wrong.

Now about that post of mine you were going to produce??

267 posted on 02/22/2006 11:02:35 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Then you should have no problem producing my post saying such a thing.

Your post #183:

The Exon-Florio statute established a 30-day review following receipt of a notification. For those transactions for which an extended 45-day review (or "investigation") is completed, a report must be provided to the President, who must by law announce the final decision within 15 days. In total, the process can not exceed 90 days.

Darn, that's inconvenient to your argument!

Which was in response to my post to wideawake that a 45-day review was required.

Of course, you'll spin that away like you've done throughout this thread.

268 posted on 02/22/2006 11:03:25 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Coop
As I said earlier, you're having a great deal of difficulty keeping up with the most basic of things on this thread (like who posted what).

I just did. You are a real piece of work, Coop. Not only was there that post, but you also further defended that "logic" in post #260.

Keep up the personal attacks, that's all you've got left.

269 posted on 02/22/2006 11:05:10 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I was saying of the two bullets shown in the statute and provided up above by jimbo, only one of those had been met.

Hardly. No sane person believes that.

270 posted on 02/22/2006 11:06:07 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: voteconstitutionparty
I know that Dubai is not the source for poppies or any other money crop.

You implied that the US regularly receives containers of smuggled heroin shipped via Dubai.

I haven't heard of such a link.

BTW - is there any major world port that the CIA believes not to be a drug transshipment point?

New York? Hamburg? Vancouver? London? Marseilles? Hong Kong? Sydney?

271 posted on 02/22/2006 11:11:49 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

What about one of the 95% of containers that don't go through any inspection and have something destructive inside which is unloaded at the destination point (not the port but the receiver).


272 posted on 02/22/2006 11:12:01 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

Your question is unclear. Please explain in more detail.


273 posted on 02/22/2006 11:13:51 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Which was in response to my post to wideawake that a 45-day review was required.

Which it's not. It's a 30-day requirement. The 90-day period was not brought up by me. You may call it spin if you like. Lord knows you need some kind of excuse for your rather abysmal performance on this thread.

274 posted on 02/22/2006 11:15:00 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
No sane person believes that.

Awwwww, is that a personal attack? Waaaaaagggghhhhhh!!!!! Oh moderators, dirtboy is being mean to me!!! [sob!]

275 posted on 02/22/2006 11:16:13 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Coop

"People like you will take care of that."

You j@rk. Have you glanced at the poll on the sidebar? MOST here on FR do not aprove of this sellout.


276 posted on 02/22/2006 11:18:09 AM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: babygene

No kidding. And most on FR haven't a frickin' clue about the details of this non-event.


277 posted on 02/22/2006 11:18:55 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: babygene

But it's President Bush's fault, don'tchaknow?!?


278 posted on 02/22/2006 11:19:17 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Coop
The 90-day period was not brought up by me.

Once again, you did just that on post #183.

279 posted on 02/22/2006 11:20:03 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

You explained that a body would not withstand the heat in a container even in a single day and I was responding to that in my post. I'm not concerned about a suicide bomber being inside a container, but materials in several containers that, combined, would product a deadly weapon.


280 posted on 02/22/2006 11:24:22 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson