Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House: Bush Didn't Know About Port Deal
FNC ^ | February 22, 2006

Posted on 02/22/2006 8:31:23 AM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON — President Bush was unaware that a controversial deal to sell shipping operations at six major U.S. seaportsto a United Arab Emirates-owned firm was in the works until it was approved by his administration, the White House said Wednesday.

After Bush repeatedly

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: botscirclewagons; bush43; bushcantbewrongcanhe; muchadoaboutnothing; newworldorder; uae
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-316 next last
To: dirtboy
The fact that you are pursuing this line of thought means you are more interested in finding the loopholes than in having the intent of the law followed.

Hey, we're kinda in agreement on something! I was thinking the same thing about folks screaming that a "25-day" review wasn't enough, didn't meet the law, or that the deal was never reviewed for security in the first place.

241 posted on 02/22/2006 10:15:52 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Coop

I called my congressman this morning and his staff have indicated that this deal triggers the 45-day extended rule. Have you called yours?


242 posted on 02/22/2006 10:15:56 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: bayourant
I agree with you but for different reasons.

I'm a Bushbot...according to the elitists here in FR.

I feel he has demonstrated that he would never place our country in jeopardy...that's the beginning and end of it.

If it's okay with President Bush, it's okay with me.

...although I am troubled by Carter and McCain's siding with him.

243 posted on 02/22/2006 10:17:27 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123
Would those be the same government bureaucracy staffers so many are saying are untrustworthy to review a complex deal like this?
244 posted on 02/22/2006 10:17:55 AM PST by brothers4thID (Being lectured by Ted Kennedy on ethics is not unlike being lectured on dating protocol by Ted Bundy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: jimbo123

Nope. And I don't intend to. If you haven't notice, the politicians are falling all over themselves to get in front of the cameras on this one (so what's new?). One can argue over whether or not criteria were met, but there's no mandate there.


245 posted on 02/22/2006 10:17:56 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

I have no opinion. ;-)


246 posted on 02/22/2006 10:18:45 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Hey, we're kinda in agreement on something! I was thinking the same thing about folks screaming that a "25-day" review wasn't enough, didn't meet the law, or that the deal was never reviewed for security in the first place.

Care to translate that as to whether you think the 45-day review is not a legal requirement?

247 posted on 02/22/2006 10:19:41 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: brothers4thID
Erhlich is already backtracking, IMO.

When asked if he would change his position, he said, "Anything is possible".

248 posted on 02/22/2006 10:24:57 AM PST by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Coop

"It was. As for the White House, it delegated the responsibility. As it so often does (and should!), and can legally do."

Yes, and the WH is fixing to delegate the leadership in the House and Senate to the damn Dem's...


249 posted on 02/22/2006 10:27:51 AM PST by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

"Dubai is listed by the CIA as a place that does that.
Really. Please provide a link, since I'm unaware of any heroin shipments from Dubai intercepted at a US port."

CIA - The World Factbook -- United Arab Emiratesconsulate(s) general: Dubai. Flag description: ... the UAE is a drug transshipment point for traffickers given its proximity to Southwest Asian drug ...
www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ae.html - 121k - Cached - Similar pages

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ae.html


250 posted on 02/22/2006 10:28:48 AM PST by voteconstitutionparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
If he didn't know about it, the last thing he should be doing is issue a veto threat to stop legislation to kill this odious deal. He will lose his credibility if Congress overrides his veto and I think the votes are there to do it. No Congresscritter wants to go home to explain to their constituents they turned our ports over to a Middle Eastern country.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

251 posted on 02/22/2006 10:31:09 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voteconstitutionparty
So, no known heroin shipments from Dubai into the US - just information that Dubai itself is the site of transshipments.

I would expect that most heroin that makes its way from Dubai to the US gets here overland via a Mexican or Venezuelan port.

252 posted on 02/22/2006 10:31:15 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Again, we're not "turning our ports over" - that's propaganda, not fact.


253 posted on 02/22/2006 10:34:14 AM PST by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I've already answered that. Perhaps you were too busy filing abuse reports to have noticed.


254 posted on 02/22/2006 10:35:41 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Coop
I've already answered that

Your answer was not correct.

255 posted on 02/22/2006 10:36:22 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: babygene
Yes, and the WH is fixing to delegate the leadership in the House and Senate to the damn Dem's...

Nope. People like you will take care of that. But of course that won't stop you from blaming your lack of knowledge on the White House not being omniscient and psychic.

256 posted on 02/22/2006 10:36:47 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: babygene
Yes, and the WH is fixing to delegate the leadership in the House and Senate to the damn Dem's...

Nope. People like you will take care of that. But of course that won't stop you from blaming your lack of knowledge on the White House not being omniscient and psychic.

257 posted on 02/22/2006 10:37:50 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Your answer was not correct.

Gosh, you're right.

 

 

Just kidding! :-D Yes, my answer was correct and source cited, thank you very much.

258 posted on 02/22/2006 10:40:12 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Yes, my answer was correct and source cited, thank you very much.

Please reconcile your claim that it has to be done within 90 days with the requirement that the 45 day review must be done in this case. Hint: the 90 day requirement is to ensure the review is done in a timely manner. It is not a means to avoid doing the 45 day review entirely as you are insinuating.

259 posted on 02/22/2006 10:42:59 AM PST by dirtboy (I'm fat, I sleep most of the winter and I saw my shadow yesterday. Does that make me a groundhog?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

30+45=75<90


260 posted on 02/22/2006 10:44:14 AM PST by Coop (FR = a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 301-316 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson